| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#1
March 10th 04, 02:36 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Radio New Zealand International
Nice to heard RNZI again ot 17657 KHz (~S9 @ 2:30 UTC). They have been a
tough catch on this frequency for some weeks. -- Brian Denley http://home.comcast.net/~b.denley/index.html |
|
#2
March 10th 04, 02:40 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
17675 Khz
Pretty clear signal here in NYC.. & agree, been a Long time since they've been so clear Dan In article Jav3c.530730$na.1298634@attbi_s04, "Brian Denley" writes: Nice to heard RNZI again ot 17657 KHz (~S9 @ 2:30 UTC). They have been a tough catch on this frequency for some weeks. -- Brian Denley http://home.comcast.net/~b.denley/index.html |
|
#3
March 10th 04, 02:45 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Brian Denley wrote: Nice to heard RNZI again ot 17657 KHz (~S9 @ 2:30 UTC). They have been a tough catch on this frequency for some weeks. Surely you must mean 17675? And yes, they are indeed coming in well. -- Brian Denley http://home.comcast.net/~b.denley/index.html |
|
#4
March 10th 04, 02:59 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
N8KDV wrote:
Surely you must mean 17675? And yes, they are indeed coming in well. Steve: Sorry for the typo - of course it's 17675 KHz. -- Brian Denley http://home.comcast.net/~b.denley/index.html |
|
#5
March 10th 04, 03:11 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Brian Denley wrote:
Nice to heard RNZI again ot 17657 KHz (~S9 @ 2:30 UTC). They have been a tough catch on this frequency for some weeks. Thanks for the heads up, Brian, on 17675. It's not moving the S-meter here in Toronto but provided an interesting comparison of my single vs cascaded DX-394 radios using AM or ECSS on the second, AM on the first. The fading on ECSS is much less than on the AM from either radio. The second radio takes the 455kHz output of the first. Tom |
|
#6
March 10th 04, 03:24 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Brian, that is a FINE radio collection.
-- Stinger "Brian Denley" wrote in message news:Jav3c.530730$na.1298634@attbi_s04... Nice to heard RNZI again ot 17657 KHz (~S9 @ 2:30 UTC). They have been a tough catch on this frequency for some weeks. -- Brian Denley http://home.comcast.net/~b.denley/index.html |
|
#7
March 10th 04, 03:30 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Stinger:
Thanks! One more and the wife promises to have me committed  )-- Brian Denley http://home.comcast.net/~b.denley/index.html "Stinger" wrote in message ... Brian, that is a FINE radio collection. -- Stinger "Brian Denley" wrote in message news:Jav3c.530730$na.1298634@attbi_s04... Nice to heard RNZI again ot 17657 KHz (~S9 @ 2:30 UTC). They have been a tough catch on this frequency for some weeks. -- Brian Denley http://home.comcast.net/~b.denley/index.html |
|
#8
March 10th 04, 12:06 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Brian Denley wrote:
Nice to heard RNZI again ot 17657 KHz (~S9 @ 2:30 UTC). They have been a tough catch on this frequency for some weeks. A sure sign of spring. More reliable than seeing the first robin. -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
|
#9
March 11th 04, 08:03 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
17675 Khz
Pretty clear signal here in NYC.. & agree, been a Long time since they've been so clear Brian & Dan, I hear them here at my QTH in Cincinnnati,Ohio on my Hammarlund 140X and on my DX398 often, just about whenever I fish then for them. It's always a solid copy. What states are you guys monitoring from, may I ask? |
|
#10
March 11th 04, 08:11 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Surely you must mean 17675? And yes, they are indeed coming in well.
It *IS* 17675 'all the time.' |
| Reply |
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Linear Mode
