I own a Royal 7000-1 Trans Oceanic----I remember the days when if you
were a SWL, you didn't *admit* to owning one!

Does anyone know if any of the radio magazines published an article on
Trans-Oceanic radios? And which one?

On and off I've subscribe to MT, CQ & Popular Communication never seen one
on Trans-Oceanic radios!

73



"S R" wrote in message
...
I did a search and I saw great pictures of some of these radios. They are
just incredible. I notice that they often came with a panel on the back
side that came up. I wonder what that was for?

Not too long ago I was at J&R's (electronic store), and I did see replicas
of vintage radios. And I did see a Trans-Oceanic style radio. It looked
like the radio that was use in the Spirit of St. Luis. But this one did
not
have SW, (dam)! I forgot the name of the brand!


And I think that The Shaper Image makes one too.

73!

In article , (NDeveau) writes:

Is anyone familiar with Loewe Opta Radios? We have a Meteor model that my
wife's father bought new in Germany around 1960.
It's an awesome looking radio with MW SW LW And FM bands.
Huge (by todays standards) with a finely crafted wood cabinet.
I've never heard it working and was wondering what kind of performance to
expect when I get it fixed.

I have what must be a Loewe Opta of about the same vintage,
but smaller and in a plastic case (I'll have to look up the
name). It's transistorized, but they're in metal cases and
plug in. It's difficult to judge sound quality, as the speaker
had been replaced by the time I got it and it's not an exact
replacement. But as far as I can tell, the radio itself performs
reasonably well. Not as good as my TransOceanic Royal (I think
a 7000) of nearly the same vintage, but quite well for a small
table radio of the era. I'd like to know more about the Loewe
Opta myself.

--
B. Z. Lederman Personal Opinions Only

Posting to a News group does NOT give anyone permission
to send me advertising by E-mail or put me on a mailing
list of any kind.

Please remove the "DISABLE-JUNK-EMAIL" if you have a
legitimate reason to E-mail a response to this post.

(ROBMURR) wrote in message ...
I did a search and I saw great pictures of some of these radios. They are
just incredible. I notice that they often came with a panel on the back
side that came up. I wonder what that was for?


If you are talking about the tube type from the 1950s that panel
lifted up from the front and was a cover for the radio dial to protect
it as well as a holder for the wavemagnet antenna...
I have an H500 from 1952? or so that I should restore one day....

I had one of those. 1950-52??. Think it was a H500. Had the square
dial in the middle like a clock...I sold that one long ago, and still
regret it. Thing was great for MW.
I have a 1958 model now. The radio itself is about the same,
"different dial layout", but I preferred the bigger loop in the H500
vs the slimmer loop in the 58 model. I forgot the model of mine...A600
maybe? But I don't use mine much any more. I used to use it all the
time, but the caps started drying out, and it would drop out once it
got warmed up. Also, the tubes are getting harder to find and more $$,
and I didn't want to fry em, if I have others radios to burn. It just
sits under my table now collecting dust...I'll fix it up some day when
I get overly bored.
I've got a 1948 RCA console I'd rather mess with than it right now. I
consider that console probably the peak of late 40's MW listening
pleasure, even though as a console, it's pretty boring looking
compared to many of the tombstones, etc. Mine is one of the first RCA
models to use the hideaway drawer on the right for the tuner. The
turntable is on the top left. What makes it semi special is it's audio
amp. It's got a semi high quality dual 6v6 audio amp. Lots of power
and good audio for the average 40's RCA console. Most used smaller
single tube audio outputs. It uses a 12 inch speaker, and has a loop
much bigger than a TO. The loop is rotatable within the rear of the
cabinet.It does cover some lower SW bands also I think up to maybe
19m?? ...
I consider it actually more desirable of an old radio to listen to
than the TO.
It sounds BIG. And it's old enuff to be different...I wasn't born yet,
when it was built... I was only 2 when my 58 TO was built...


If your talking about the later solid state ones, I have no clue.

I've never had any interest in the solid state TO's....Only the tube
jobs. The TO was a high quality radio for it's day. One of the
highest priced you could buy of it's type. MK

I bought my Royal 7000-1 for $250 in 1971, that was a LOT of money to a
kid who's only income was babysitting $$$. I've had offers to sell it
and it ain't going nowhere!



Trans-Oceanic Radios

Group: rec.radio.shortwave Date: Tue, Mar 23, 2004, 9:17pm (EST-3) From:
(Mark=A0Keith)
(ROBMURR) wrote in message
...
I did a search and I saw great pictures of some of these radios. They
are just incredible. I notice that they often came with a panel on the
back side that came up. I wonder what that was for?
If you are talking about the tube type from the 1950s that panel lifted
up from the front and was a cover for the radio dial to protect it as
well as a holder for the wavemagnet antenna... I have an H500 from 1952?
or so that I should restore one day....
I had one of those. 1950-52??. Think it was a H500. Had the square dial
in the middle like a clock...I sold that one long ago, and still regret
it. Thing was great for MW.
I have a 1958 model now. The radio itself is about the same, "different
dial layout", but I preferred the bigger loop in the H500 vs the slimmer
loop in the 58 model. I forgot the model of mine...A600 maybe? But I
don't use mine much any more. I used to use it all the time, but the
caps started drying out, and it would drop out once it got warmed up.
Also, the tubes are getting harder to find and more $$, and I didn't
want to fry em, if I have others radios to burn. It just sits under my
table now collecting dust...I'll fix it up some day when I get overly
bored.
I've got a 1948 RCA console I'd rather mess with than it right now. I
consider that console probably the peak of late 40's MW listening
pleasure, even though as a console, it's pretty boring looking compared
to many of the tombstones, etc. Mine is one of the first RCA models to
use the hideaway drawer on the right for the tuner. The turntable is on
the top left. What makes it semi special is it's audio amp. It's got a
semi high quality dual 6v6 audio amp. Lots of power and good audio for
the average 40's RCA console. Most used smaller single tube audio
outputs. It uses a 12 inch speaker, and has a loop much bigger than a
TO. The loop is rotatable within the rear of the cabinet.It does cover
some lower SW bands also I think up to maybe 19m?? ...
I consider it actually more desirable of an old radio to listen to than
the TO.
It sounds BIG. And it's old enuff to be different...I wasn't born yet,
when it was built... I was only 2 when my 58 TO was built...
If your talking about the later solid state ones, I have no clue.
I've never had any interest in the solid state TO's....Only the tube
jobs. The TO was a high quality radio for it's day. One of the highest
priced you could buy of it's type. MK