Billionaires for Bush
 

And how will the SUV driving soccer mom react to rising gas prices? Say, $3.00
a gallon?

- When their husbands job has been offshored to India, and he's desperatly
looking for ANYTHING that pays a salary ??

Stay tuned, Rich White Man...
- stay tuned..

Harvey

Actually, there is nothing to think about here at all. Anyone but an
idiot could see that for all or this century, and especially for the
last 20 years, big business has only consulted what good for IT, not
what's good for the country.

Try not to be too ignorant.

Leonard


In article ,
(RHF) wrote:

HARVEY,

Here Is Something To Think About . . .


IF as Clamed by the Democrats and the Media that George W. Bush
is tied to Big Business and is The President for Corporate America.
- - - Then, why is Big Business / Corporate America NOT Hiring and
Reducing Un-Employment to HELP Re-Elect George W. Bush ?

Therefore, We Must Conclude Big Business is for the Election of
John F. Kerry; by keeping Un-Employment High.


IF as Clamed by the Democrats and the Media that George W. Bush
is tied to Big Oil and is The President for the Oil Companies.
- - - Then, why is Big Oil / Oil Companies NOT Lowering the Price
of Gas and Oil to HELP Re-Elect George W. Bush ?

Therefore, We Must Conclude Big Oil is FOR the Election of
John F. Kerry; by keeping Gas and Oil Prices High.


stta ~ RHF
= = = Something To Think About !
.
.
= = = (Soames123) wrote in message
= = = ...

And how will the SUV driving soccer mom react to rising gas prices ?
Say, $3.00 a gallon ?

- When their husbands job has been offshored to India,
and he's desperatly looking for ANYTHING that pays a salary ? ?

Stay tuned, Rich White Man...
- stay tuned..

Harvey

.

--
"Everything that rises must converge"
--Flannery O'Connor

"Leonard Martin" wrote in message
...
Actually, there is nothing to think about here at all. Anyone but an
idiot could see that for all or this century, and especially for the
last 20 years, big business has only consulted what good for IT, not
what's good for the country.

Try not to be too ignorant.


You seem to be assuming the two alternatives you pose are mutually
inconsistent--not a particularly nuanced position for someone so
concerned with ignorance.