Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Michael Black wrote:
I'm not sure why they moved from WWV to WWVB, but clearly there is more penetration of WWWV-based clocks than WWV-based clocks. Reception of WWV on shortwave is not reliable enough. WWVB uses a very low frequency (VLF) which is not affected by propagation conditions like shortwave. -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
WWVB decoder circuit | Homebrew | |||
WWVB decoder circuit | Broadcasting | |||
WWVB decoder circuit | Homebrew | |||
WWVB decoder circuit | Homebrew | |||
WWVB decoder circuit | Homebrew |