Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I injected the signal straight into the antenna input..................the
same way I test all of my receivers. As an example, the AOR7030, Icom R75, Palstar R30, Yaesu FRG100, and the Racal 6790/GM all will clearly detect a signal well below .1uV. This sample of the SW8 loses the signal at the .3uV range. It sounds like about 10dB of RF gain is missing. The soft measurement method was used, with a Boonton Model 103D RF generator connected straight into the antenna input vs running it through a 50 Ohm thru load. The soft method yields around a 6dB better sensitivity figure. When I first purchased the receiver, I did purchase the schematic set. Not a bad deal for around 30 dollars. I hope that they can figure out what's going on with this unit. Work has kept me so busy that I just haven't had the time to get to this one. My latest project has been an AD9851 based RF Generator. I just finished the board layout, and if this thing works properly, I will make the design available to interested parties, free of charge. Pete "starman" wrote in message ... Pete KE9OA wrote: I picked up one of these units last October.................anyway, I noticed that the sensitivity wasn't as good as my other units, so I decided to make some measurements. Across the whole tuning range, the MDS is ..3uV, while with all of my other receivers (7 of them), the MDS is below .1uV. Is there any failure mechanism that occurs with this receiver? I do have the schematic set. Hi Pete, I have the schematic sets for both the early and later SW8. The early models were reported to have a poor impedance match for the whip antenna. The later schematics show some changes in the componants of the double diode circuit which protects for static electricity on the whip. This circuit is also connected differently to the following circuits in the later model. There's a change in value for the series resistor on the gate of Q1 (2SK152), the whip amp'. Some of the capacitor values in this gate circuit are also changed. Q1 might be running at a higher gain in the later models but this would only affect the whip sensitivity because the other HF antenna inputs bypass Q1 through the antenna selection switch (SW2) on the back of the receiver. I think these changes (above) were made in 1994. The biggest change occurred in 1996 when the selectable sideband sync' detector was added. The first digit in the serial number denotes the year of manufacture. How did you inject the test signal? Maybe your SW8 is out of alignment. -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FA Lots of Nice Drake Gear | Equipment | |||
FA Lots of Nice Drake Gear | Equipment | |||
FA Lots of Nice Drake Gear | Equipment | |||
FA Lots of Nice Drake Gear | Boatanchors | |||
Drake TR-3 transceiver synthesizer upgrade | Homebrew |