Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
starman wrote in message ...
Mark Zenier wrote: (And I wonder if the Christian Scientists are going to hire the Russiansto jam RA again this summer, like the last couple of years. 9585 at 12:00 UTC. It'll be kind of tough with them on both 9590 and 9580). You didn't really mean to say 'jam', did you? Yup. There were huge chunks of the 9 MHz band open, but they just happened to pick a frequency 5 kHz away from RA's only reliable frequency into North America (and probably parts of the Pacific). RA even put a note on their web site recommending a 11 MHz frequency, (which wasn't as good here, as it was the same frequency as Radio Kiev, which sometimes stepped on it, depending on propagation). And the Christian Science web site was vague about where the transmitter was (but it warmed up to strains of Mussorgsky (sp?)), and what the coverage area was. They said China, but they were sending a strong blast in the opposite direction. The fact that RA moved their 11 MHz transmission down to 9590 kHz in their B03 schedule, right next to the existing 9580, seems to me that they're sending a message to somebody. There's probably an interesting inside story, but I expect I'll never know. Mark Zenier Washington State resident |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mark Zenier wrote:
starman wrote in message ... Mark Zenier wrote: (And I wonder if the Christian Scientists are going to hire the Russiansto jam RA again this summer, like the last couple of years. 9585 at 12:00 UTC. It'll be kind of tough with them on both 9590 and 9580). You didn't really mean to say 'jam', did you? Yup. There were huge chunks of the 9 MHz band open, but they just happened to pick a frequency 5 kHz away from RA's only reliable frequency into North America (and probably parts of the Pacific). RA even put a note on their web site recommending a 11 MHz frequency, (which wasn't as good here, as it was the same frequency as Radio Kiev, which sometimes stepped on it, depending on propagation). And the Christian Science web site was vague about where the transmitter was (but it warmed up to strains of Mussorgsky (sp?)), and what the coverage area was. They said China, but they were sending a strong blast in the opposite direction. The fact that RA moved their 11 MHz transmission down to 9590 kHz in their B03 schedule, right next to the existing 9580, seems to me that they're sending a message to somebody. There's probably an interesting inside story, but I expect I'll never know. Why would CS want to jam RA? In fact, jamming is supposed to occur on the same frequency as the targeted country. -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Amateur Radio Newslineâ„¢ Report 1415 Â September 24, 2004 | Broadcasting | |||
Amateur Radio Newslineâ„¢ Report 1415 Â September 24, 2004 | Policy | |||
Amateur Radio Newslineâ„¢ Report 1402 Â June 25, 2004 | Broadcasting | |||
Amateur Radio Newslin(tm) Report 1385 – February 27, 2004 | General | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1379 – January 16, 2004 | Dx |