LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #16   Report Post  
Old March 30th 04, 07:14 AM
Telamon
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article ,
"Frank Dresser" wrote:

"Telamon" wrote in
message
...
In article
,
"Frank Dresser" wrote:

"Telamon" wrote in
message

t...


Who can hear the content can be determined by the encoding.
People that don't have the "code" will not be able to hear it.
Codes could be built into the radios so that they can only
decipher some broadcasts similar to DVD players today or pay
radio streams on the Internet. Besides codes built into the
radios you might have to key in more codes to hear some
broadcasts or load in a deciphering program from computer to
radio similar to pay satellite TV.


Which SW broadcaster would try to limit their audience?
Certainly not the propaganda stations. Not the evangalists. Not
the conspiratorialists.


snip

Maybe the best thing for you to do is go stick your head back in
the sand where it will be more comfortable.

-- Telamon


OK, so tell me. Which broadcaster might require these special,
additional codes?

Would any SWL jump through the new proprietary DRM hoops? I
wouldn't. Would you? Would anyone you know?


I can¹t tell you what everyone is likely to do but I¹m sure that out of
all the SW listeners some would jump through the hoops willingly. I
can¹t believe that some people would pay for XM radio either but they
do.

You say DRM doesn't sound any better than standard SW broadcasting.
If true, DRM wouldn't present any additional benefit to either the
broadcaster or the listener. Why would a proprietary DRM system be
better than the open system?


I don¹t believe the argument that DRM can sound better than analog
using the same bandwidth.

I have listened to the recordings on the DRM site and they sure don¹t
sound better. No back ground noise sure but lots of audio artifacts
generated by the compression and playback algorithms.

Name any digital medium carrying popular content that is not controlled
in some way by codes that must be paid for in advance. I fully expect
SW radios will be controlled to hear at least some of the content as
soon as those radios are around.

The reasons for controlling who can hear SW broadcasts could be
financial or propagandist.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1415 ­ September 24, 2004 Radionews Dx 0 September 24th 04 05:52 PM
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1415 ­ September 24, 2004 Radionews Dx 0 September 24th 04 05:52 PM
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1402 ­ June 25, 2004 Radionews Dx 0 June 25th 04 07:28 PM
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1379 – January 16, 2004 Radionews Broadcasting 0 January 19th 04 12:57 AM
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1379 – January 16, 2004 Radionews General 0 January 18th 04 09:34 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:17 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017