Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old April 1st 04, 08:23 PM
T. Early
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"RHF" wrote in message
m...
FW,

"a female interviewer was talking to Ralph Nadar and trying to
get him to admit he'd thrown the election to Bush in 2000,"

ONE MORE DEMOCRAT LIE:

Ralph Nader was NOT the difference (Numerically) in any state
between Bush and Gore when you subtract out Pat Buchanan.
[ The Negatives (RN) balanced out the Pluses (PB). ]

However, Pat Buchanan DID 'make' the "Difference Numerically"
in three states.
[ To put them in the Gore (Won) Column and the Bush (Lost) Box. ]

Just the Facts ~ RHF


Sorry RHF--Nader got about 97,000 votes in Florida, Buchanan about
17,000. Gotta be fair.


  #2   Report Post  
Old April 3rd 04, 11:50 PM
RHF
 
Posts: n/a
Default

= = = "T. Early" wrote in message
= = = ...
"RHF" wrote in message
m...
FW,

"a female interviewer was talking to Ralph Nadar and trying to
get him to admit he'd thrown the election to Bush in 2000,"

ONE MORE DEMOCRAT LIE:

Ralph Nader was NOT the difference (Numerically) in any state
between Bush and Gore when you subtract out Pat Buchanan.
[ The Negatives (RN) balanced out the Pluses (PB). ]

However, Pat Buchanan DID 'make' the "Difference Numerically"
in three states.
[ To put them in the Gore (Won) Column and the Bush (Lost) Box. ]

Just the Facts ~ RHF


Sorry RHF--Nader got about 97,000 votes in Florida, Buchanan about
17,000. Gotta be fair.


TE,

I was not talking about Florida

Bush = 2,912,790
Gore = 2,912,253
DELTA = 537
Buchanan = 17,484
Had Pat Buchanan not been in
the 2000 Presidential Election
Florida would have went for BUSH - Big Time !
http://www.fec.gov/pubrec/fe2000/2000presge.htm


I was talking about these four states where Pat Buchanan
did in-fact cost GW Bush "The WIN" in those States:

* IOWA = Seven (7) Electoral Votes
Gore = 638,517
Bush = 634,373
DELTA = 4,144
Buchanan = 5,731
Had Pat Buchanan not been in
the 2000 Presidential Election
IOWA would have went for BUSH.

* NEW MEXICO = Five (5) Electoral Votes
Gore = 286,783
Bush = 286,417
DELTA = 366
Buchanan = 1,392
Had Pat Buchanan not been in
the 2000 Presidential Election
New Mexico would have went for BUSH.

* OREGON = Seven (7) Electoral Votes
Gore = 720,342
Bush = 713,577
DELTA = 6,765
Buchanan = 7,063
Had Pat Buchanan not been in
the 2000 Presidential Election
Oregon would have went for BUSH.

* WISCONSIN = Eleven (11) Electoral Votes
Gore = 1,242,987
Bush = 1,237,279
DELTA = 5,708
Buchanan 11,471
Had Pat Buchanan not been in
the 2000 Presidential Election
Oregon would have went for BUSH.


A "Total" of Thirty (30) Electoral Votes for GW Bush )


jtf ~ RHF

..
  #3   Report Post  
Old April 4th 04, 04:33 AM
T. Early
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"RHF" wrote in message
om...
= = = "T. Early" wrote in message
= = = ...
"RHF" wrote in message
m...
FW,

"a female interviewer was talking to Ralph Nadar and trying to
get him to admit he'd thrown the election to Bush in 2000,"

ONE MORE DEMOCRAT LIE:

Ralph Nader was NOT the difference (Numerically) in any state
between Bush and Gore when you subtract out Pat Buchanan.
[ The Negatives (RN) balanced out the Pluses (PB). ]

However, Pat Buchanan DID 'make' the "Difference Numerically"
in three states.
[ To put them in the Gore (Won) Column and the Bush (Lost)

Box. ]

Just the Facts ~ RHF


Sorry RHF--Nader got about 97,000 votes in Florida, Buchanan about
17,000. Gotta be fair.


TE,

I was not talking about Florida

Bush = 2,912,790
Gore = 2,912,253
DELTA = 537
Buchanan = 17,484
Had Pat Buchanan not been in
the 2000 Presidential Election
Florida would have went for BUSH - Big Time !
http://www.fec.gov/pubrec/fe2000/2000presge.htm


OK, then I don't understand what you mean by this I guess: "Ralph
Nadir was NOT the difference (Numerically) in any state between Bush
and Gore when you subtract out Pat Buchanan."

When you take Buchanan out of the mix (or even give his votes to Bush)
Nader was the difference in Florida and New Hampshire. If you assume
most Nader votes go to Gore, Gore wins Florida and New Hampshire.


  #4   Report Post  
Old April 4th 04, 04:00 PM
Larry Ozarow
 
Posts: n/a
Default



T. Early wrote:


OK, then I don't understand what you mean by this I guess: "Ralph
Nadir was NOT the difference (Numerically) in any state between Bush
and Gore when you subtract out Pat Buchanan."

When you take Buchanan out of the mix (or even give his votes to Bush)
Nader was the difference in Florida and New Hampshire. If you assume
most Nader votes go to Gore, Gore wins Florida and New Hampshire.



There was also some evidence or at least a reasonable
argument that some of the Buchanan vote in Florida
was intended for Gore, but got diverted by a messy
ballot layout.
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
WRN's English language networks can be heard via the following outlets Mike Terry Broadcasting 0 November 6th 04 06:39 AM
US satellite radio - defection to satellite radio may elevate medium Mike Terry Broadcasting 0 October 12th 04 04:29 AM
US satellite radio pins hopes on women, cars Mike Terry Broadcasting 0 October 12th 04 04:29 AM
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? lbbs Antenna 16 December 13th 03 04:01 PM
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? lbbs Shortwave 16 December 13th 03 04:01 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:25 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017