Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old April 7th 04, 07:36 PM
Leonard Martin
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article ,
"Frank Dresser" wrote:

"Larry Ozarow" wrote in message
...
Frank, it's true that this is what the Boston
Globe op-ed piece says, but it's based on a total
misunderstanding of the analysis that (AFAIK) started
this whole red-blue thing - David Brooks' article
in 2001 in the Atlantic. Brooks is a conservative
but he characterized the blue electorate as more
educated, and by no small margin. It's well-known
that I am not a confrontational polarized kind of guy,
but it's unfair that conservatives can get away with
characterizing liberals as effete over-educated slobs,
and as undereducated boobs, glued to Jerry Springer.

Oz



Any generalization about liberals, or any group, will probably be unfair.
But I don't think it's unreasonable to counter one unfair generalization
with another unfair generalization in an discussion. Everyone gets a fair
chance to clarify their points.

And as far as the analysis of education and politics -- I don't know how
much can be made of it. It might be true that liberals(or democrats) have
more formal education than conservatives(or republicans), but so what? My
formal education ended when I dropped out of a junior college trade school.
I'm capable of learning independently, and I'm sure I'm not the only one. I
don't consider myself anyone's fool. And I haven't seen any proof that
formal education is immunization from foolishness.

Frank Dresser



I'm sure you're no fool. What you may well lack (and if you do you'll
have no way of knowing it) is intellectual and historical context for
today's prevailing ideas. Contextual knowledge help in analyzing and
evaluating ideas. I still remember the wide new panoramas of insight and
understanding that I discovered in college.

Leonard

--
"Everything that rises must converge"
--Flannery O'Connor
  #2   Report Post  
Old April 7th 04, 10:28 PM
Frank Dresser
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Leonard Martin" wrote in message
...

I'm sure you're no fool. What you may well lack (and if you do you'll
have no way of knowing it) is intellectual and historical context for
today's prevailing ideas. Contextual knowledge help in analyzing and
evaluating ideas. I still remember the wide new panoramas of insight and
understanding that I discovered in college.

Leonard


I find out what I don't know every time I'm challenged and I can't back up
what I say.

Frank Dresser


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1415 ­ September 24, 2004 Radionews Dx 0 September 24th 04 05:52 PM
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1412 ­ September 3, 2004 Radionews General 0 September 4th 04 08:35 PM
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1400 ­ June 11, 2004 Radionews General 0 June 16th 04 08:35 PM
Amateur Radio Newslineâ„¢ Report 1384 February 20, 2004 Radionews Dx 0 February 27th 04 09:41 AM
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1379 – January 16, 2004 Radionews Policy 0 January 18th 04 09:35 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:45 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017