Telamon wrote:


I said they could be. It's obvious that this is an election
destabilizing tacit.


An attempt to defeat the incumbent is not a "destabilizing
tactic." It is what the rules call for every four years.
More often in the House and less in the Senate.


My parents are Democrats and I like them. I don't know if I would like
the Democrats you know.


Oooh. that was nasty.


Communists or Democratic party dirty tricks, take your pick.

First of all, I don't really think the two are equivalent, do you?
Are you saying that Democrats are as bad as Communists? Your parents
for God's sake? Or is
this some sort of kettle logic all-purpose denunciation of the network
because it disagrees with what you believe? I'll stand by my contention
that Liberal Democrats have a right to air our opinions. And that's the
next turn in your position, by the way; now it's the Democratic
party, and not just shadowy forces? Oh goody, if Ashcroft can get the
goods on them we can shut the whole evil enterprise down and get down
to some serious one-party democracy.


I fear that talk radio will go back to what is was when I was teenager.
Just this morning I awoke to the soothing tones of a voice from NPR
telling me that we all know the world is two complicated a place to be
looked at as black and white but shades of gray. Not a good way start to
the day.

Because the liberals might take over, and drive the right-wingers off
the air? It was during the Clinton Soviet that it prospered. Have no
fear, comrade. You're the one who's opposed to vigorous debate over the
air. None of the Democrats I know, whether you would like them or not,
are interested in silencing Conservative talk radio. It's too easy an
enemy.