|
True. The only point I made was that the wrong "bad guy" was cited.
-- Stinger "RHF" wrote in message om... STINGER, The Liberal 'left' always likes to cite Hitler as the EVIL ONE ! Hitler - NAZI - Fascism * Estimate 16 Million Killed But, the Left has its own Monsters who Killed Many More in the Name of the 'just cause' of World Communism: Pol Pot - Communism * Estimate 4 Million Killed Mao - Cultural Revolution - Communism * Estimate 32 Million Killed Stalin - Communism * Estimate 40 Million Killed * Note: Murdered Directly, Starved to Death, or Force into Slave Labor Camps to Work and Die. ADD a few Acient Killers like Ghengis Khan, Kublai Khan, Atilla the Hun and Tamerlane. Check-Out Hyper-History: http://www.hyperhistory.com/online_n...n2/hist_6.html Just the Facts ~ RHF . . = = = "Stinger" wrote in message = = = ... RHF, Hitler and the Nazis deserve their own special place in hell, and resemble neither of the popular political parties in the USA. However, you can draw some interesting parallels between the philosophies of liberal Democrats and the Politburo of the former USSR. -- Stinger "RHF" wrote in message m... = = = ocom (Michael Bryant) wrote in message = = = ... From: "Mark S. Holden" Stalin has not announced that he's running for President, this year. Of course, being dead and all, that would be hard for him... He could run as a Democrat. :) And Hitler could run as a Republican. It would probably be close. MWB - Hitler was 'in-fact' a National Socialist "NAZI" So... Today in the USofA - Hilter would be a Liberal Democrat. * Pro-Choice = The Killing of Babys * Anti-Israel = Anti-Jewish Just the Facts ~ RHF . . Michael Bryant, WA4009SWL Louisville, KY R75, S800, RX320, SW77, ICF2010K, DX398, 7600G, 6800W, RF2200, 7600A GE SRll, Pro-2006, Pro-2010, Pro-76 (remove "nojunk" to reply) |
Michael Bryant wrote: From: N8KDV Facts are facts! You don't have a PhD! And what facts can you provide? All I've admitted was not having completed one in 2001. But you indicated in 2000 that you had a PhD... here once again Fat Boy is the quote: "Report away. I'm a college professor with a PhD, so I'm sure you're clearly right that I'm an idiot." Yet again proving that you lied! |
"N8KDV" wrote in message ... Michael Bryant wrote: From: N8KDV Facts are facts! You don't have a PhD! And what facts can you provide? All I've admitted was not having completed one in 2001. But you indicated in 2000 that you had a PhD... here once again Fat Boy is the quote: "Report away. I'm a college professor with a PhD, so I'm sure you're clearly right that I'm an idiot." Yet again proving that you lied! When I was in college, I saw a study that found that the median I.Q. for Ph.D.'s was 115. Though that certainly doesn't fall in "idiot" territory, it's not exactly bragging rights either. -- Stinger |
Stinger wrote: "N8KDV" wrote in message ... Michael Bryant wrote: From: N8KDV Facts are facts! You don't have a PhD! And what facts can you provide? All I've admitted was not having completed one in 2001. But you indicated in 2000 that you had a PhD... here once again Fat Boy is the quote: "Report away. I'm a college professor with a PhD, so I'm sure you're clearly right that I'm an idiot." Yet again proving that you lied! When I was in college, I saw a study that found that the median I.Q. for Ph.D.'s was 115. Though that certainly doesn't fall in "idiot" territory, it's not exactly bragging rights either. My question now would be what is the median I.Q. for those who lie about having a PhD? |
"N8KDV" wrote | You 2nd grade one-liners are boring the students, though. | | What? The kindergartners don't understand? Ahh, here we have a validation of what I think of Lunchbox Mikey. I stated some time ago that he thought he was a teacher here in RRS, and not a contributor. His sarcastic remark nailed that supposition down nicely, don't you think? Yes, we are the students, here in RRS, and Mikey is trying to educate us. It all makes sense now. 73, Steve Lawrence KA0PMD Burnsville, Minnesota --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.634 / Virus Database: 406 - Release Date: 3/18/04 |
|
Michael Bryant wrote: From: N8KDV And by golly Fat Boy, they were just on again at 1338! Amazing ain't it! Only thing really amazing is that you seem to be the only one in North America hearing them on a daily basis... Can't help that! Better antenna? Better receiver(s)? One thing for sure Fat Boy... I'm not lying about it like you've lied about that PhD! |
|
|
N8KDV wrote: Michael Bryant wrote: From: N8KDV And by golly Fat Boy, they were just on again at 1338! Amazing ain't it! Only thing really amazing is that you seem to be the only one in North America hearing them on a daily basis... Can't help that! Better antenna? Better receiver(s)? ..... no Cheeto's stuck in my ears? One thing for sure Fat Boy... I'm not lying about it like you've lied about that PhD! |
Michael Bryant wrote: From: "Stinger" When I was in college, I saw a study that found that the median I.Q. for Ph.D.'s was 115. Though that certainly doesn't fall in "idiot" territory, it's not exactly bragging rights either. I've seen other studies suggesting that the median IQ for a PhD is above 130. I assure you mine's higher than that. Can you document that Fat Boy... Or is it just a figment of your imagination like that nonexistent PhD? What's the average IQ for a Republican from Mississippi? Certainly higher than that of someone who lies about having a PhD! Astronomical, undoubtedly. Yes, like the number of your lies Fat Boy! |
|
|
Michael Bryant wrote: From: N8KDV Can you document that Fat Boy... Or is it just a figment of your imagination like that nonexistent PhD? Actually, I can since I was in an experiment recently that required an IQ test. I'm sure you've been the subject of many experiments Fat Boy! The next one that might be tried is an experiment to determine if it's possible to cure your pathological lying! |
|
|
Michael Bryant wrote: From: N8KDV The next one that might be tried is an experiment to determine if it's possible to cure your pathological lying! You sidestepped the question, Steve. To avoid all these silly accusations, would you like me to mail you a copy of the results of my most recent IQ tests? I'm not interested in reading fiction Fat Boy!... Your present IQ has nothing whatsoever to do with the fact that you are a pathological liar! |
N8KDV:
I'm not interested in reading fiction Fat Boy!... Your present IQ has nothing whatsoever to do with the fact that you are a pathological liar! Afraid to find out that I'm a lot smarter than you are? Michael Bryant, WA4009SWL Louisville, KY R75, S800, RX320, SW77, ICF2010K, DX398, 7600G, 6800W, RF2200, 7600A GE SRll, Pro-2006, Pro-2010, Pro-76 (remove "nojunk" to reply) |
Michael Bryant wrote: From: "-=jd=-" Is it reasonable to consider that once you completed your transition from KY to UT, you lowered the average IQ of both locales? Well, if you think about it a little while you might grasp the logical error you made in your question. Doubtful, though. Found any more uses for baby wipes? You might use them to clean your bong Fat Boy! |
Michael Bryant wrote: N8KDV: I'm not interested in reading fiction Fat Boy!... Your present IQ has nothing whatsoever to do with the fact that you are a pathological liar! Afraid to find out that I'm a lot smarter than you are? Yes, I know you are 'smarter' at lyin and fabricatin! That much I do know oh PhD challenged one! |
Michael Bryant wrote: N8KDV: I'm not interested in reading fiction Fat Boy!... Your present IQ has nothing whatsoever to do with the fact that you are a pathological liar! Afraid to find out that I'm a lot smarter than you are? I've found in my own studies that folks who brag about being a lot smarter than others generally are not! In many cases they are failed academics who try to inflate their educational records by claiming to have degree's that they have not earned! |
Michael 'I gave it all up for pot' Bryant wrote: From: N8KDV And by golly Fat Boy, they were just on again at 1338! Amazing ain't it! Only thing really amazing is that you seem to be the only one in North America hearing them on a daily basis... And by golly Fat Boy they were just up again at 2005... Better invest some of those big 'PhD' bucks into a better receiving set-up! Sitting here listening to DX... and enjoying myself! |
In article ,
ocom (Michael Bryant) wrote: From: N8KDV Can you document that Fat Boy... Or is it just a figment of your imagination like that nonexistent PhD? Actually, I can since I was in an experiment recently that required an IQ test. Where would you like the documentation sent? I assume you won't just take my word on the issue. I am certainly willing to mail you a copy of the results, if you wish. What mind altering drugs were you required to take for the experiment? Since you volunteered does that count toward time off? -- Telamon Ventura, California |
"Michael Bryant" wrote in message ... From: "Stinger" When I was in college, I saw a study that found that the median I.Q. for Ph.D.'s was 115. Though that certainly doesn't fall in "idiot" territory, it's not exactly bragging rights either. I've seen other studies suggesting that the median IQ for a PhD is above 130. I assure you mine's higher than that. What's the average IQ for a Republican from Mississippi? Astronomical, undoubtedly. Michael Bryant, WA4009SWL Louisville, KY R75, S800, RX320, SW77, ICF2010K, DX398, 7600G, 6800W, RF2200, 7600A GE SRll, Pro-2006, Pro-2010, Pro-76 (remove "nojunk" to reply) Obviously! -- Stinger |
Michael Bryant wrote: From: "Stinger" When I was in college, I saw a study that found that the median I.Q. for Ph.D.'s was 115. Though that certainly doesn't fall in "idiot" territory, it's not exactly bragging rights either. I've seen other studies suggesting that the median IQ for a PhD is above 130. I assure you mine's higher than that. Really? But you don't have a PhD do you? Sure, you took some classes... but you never had the PhD conferred. Care to explain what that little technicality was that prevented you from receiving that PhD? LOL! |
Michael Bryant wrote: From: "Stinger" When I was in college, I saw a study that found that the median I.Q. for Ph.D.'s was 115. Though that certainly doesn't fall in "idiot" territory, it's not exactly bragging rights either. I've seen other studies suggesting that the median IQ for a PhD is above 130. I assure you mine's higher than that. What's the average IQ for a Republican from Mississippi? No matter what the IQ of the Republican from Mississippi they would certainly have more common sense than an idiot from Kentucky who has lied about having a PhD! |
In article ,
N8KDV wrote: Michael Bryant wrote: From: "Stinger" When I was in college, I saw a study that found that the median I.Q. for Ph.D.'s was 115. Though that certainly doesn't fall in "idiot" territory, it's not exactly bragging rights either. I've seen other studies suggesting that the median IQ for a PhD is above 130. I assure you mine's higher than that. Really? But you don't have a PhD do you? Sure, you took some classes... but you never had the PhD conferred. Care to explain what that little technicality was that prevented you from receiving that PhD? LOL! You are asking a real easy question Steve. He obviously ****ed off the professor that was in charge of guiding/reviewing his dissertation before presentation. Without that guy no Ph.D. Sound like familiar behavior to you? -- Telamon Ventura, California |
Telamon wrote: In article , N8KDV wrote: Michael Bryant wrote: From: "Stinger" When I was in college, I saw a study that found that the median I.Q. for Ph.D.'s was 115. Though that certainly doesn't fall in "idiot" territory, it's not exactly bragging rights either. I've seen other studies suggesting that the median IQ for a PhD is above 130. I assure you mine's higher than that. Really? But you don't have a PhD do you? Sure, you took some classes... but you never had the PhD conferred. Care to explain what that little technicality was that prevented you from receiving that PhD? LOL! You are asking a real easy question Steve. He obviously ****ed off the professor that was in charge of guiding/reviewing his dissertation before presentation. Without that guy no Ph.D. Sound like familiar behavior to you? Sure does! |
|
|
|
Michael Bryant wrote: From: N8KDV No matter what the IQ of the Republican from Mississippi they would certainly have more common sense than an idiot from Kentucky who has lied about having a PhD! Hey, Steve, why don't you go to the Drudge website and take that IQ test in their ad banners. I'm sure that with the wit you display in your responses you'll score REAL high.... Is that where you took YOUR IQ test Fat Boy? |
|
-=jd=- wrote: On Sat 17 Apr 2004 02:24:56p, "-=jd=-" wrote in message : On Sat 17 Apr 2004 02:21:19p, "-=jd=-" wrote in message : On Sat 17 Apr 2004 01:53:25p, ocom (Michael Bryant) wrote in message : From: "-=jd=-" Is it reasonable to consider that once you completed your transition from KY to UT, you lowered the average IQ of both locales? Well, if you think about it a little while you might grasp the logical error you made in your question. Doubtful, though. Found any more uses for baby wipes? No, if you think about it, I put it exactly like I thought would be most accurate. Is your sense of humor broken today? :-) -=jd=- On the off chance a more prominent hint is needed, I was making a joke about both locations... On the other hand, don't worry about it. I just re-read where you indicated you rely on usenet posts as a political barometer, so taking that into consideration, I'm not sure of your sense of humor. I thought at one point you were receptive to a bit of humor. Perhaps I was mistaken. Now, I'm just a dumb non-college educated bumpkin, but I'll try to explain this so even a college graduate can understand it: In KY, your IQ (whatever it is) was higher than the average hill-billy, ergo when you were there, your contribution to the list of scores raised the overall average IQ score. In UT, the average IQ is higher than yours, ergo, your contribution to the list of scores lowers the overall average IQ. To sum it up: You raise the (low) average IQ of KY when you are there. You lower the (higher) average IQ of UT when you are there. When you transitioned from KY to UT, you lowered the average IQ of both locales with one move. I can try to explain it s-l-o-w-e-r, if needed... You might have to explain it in S--P--E--C--I--A--L E--N--G--L--I--S--H. (For the PhD challenged) |
From: "-=jd=-" Is it reasonable to consider that once you completed your transition from KY to UT, you lowered the average IQ of both locales? Well, if you think about it a little while you might grasp the logical error you made in your question. Doubtful, though. Found any more uses for baby wipes? No, if you think about it, I put it exactly like I thought would be most accurate. Is your sense of humor broken today? :-) -=jd=- On the off chance a more prominent hint is needed, I was making a joke about both locations... On the other hand, don't worry about it. I just re-read where you indicated you rely on usenet posts as a political barometer, so taking that into consideration, I'm not sure of your sense of humor. I thought at one point you were receptive to a bit of humor. Perhaps I was mistaken. Now, I'm just a dumb non-college educated bumpkin, but I'll try to explain this so even a college graduate can understand it: In KY, your IQ (whatever it is) was higher than the average hill-billy, ergo when you were there, your contribution to the list of scores raised the overall average IQ score. In UT, the average IQ is higher than yours, ergo, your contribution to the list of scores lowers the overall average IQ. To sum it up: You raise the (low) average IQ of KY when you are there. You lower the (higher) average IQ of UT when you are there. When you transitioned from KY to UT, you lowered the average IQ of both locales with one move. I can try to explain it s-l-o-w-e-r, if needed... Well for one 1. You've obviously never been to Utah. 2.) Hillbillies exist primarily in Eastern KY, not in most the state and 3. Your humor reflects on the intelligence of someone that would need baby wipes to get oil out of his carpet, which, BTW, makes you sound more like a hillbilly than anyone I've recently met! Next time, stick to jokes that are actually humorous. Michael Bryant, WA4009SWL Louisville, KY R75, S800, RX320, SW77, ICF2010K, DX398, 7600G, 6800W, RF2200, 7600A GE SRll, Pro-2006, Pro-2010, Pro-76 (remove "nojunk" to reply) |
|
Michael Bryant wrote: From: "-=jd=-" Yes, from your response above, you have done a good job confirming that the joke was right on target. However, I did not expect it to fit so perfectly that it would sail right over your head... Twice... Do you hear slight whizzing noises often? The real thing is simply that your "joke" wasn't funny. If you think it was, well that says more about you than me. Is this "Republican" humor? Making stereotypes about whole states being "hillbilly"? Making sexual innuendoes by labeling me a "drama-queen"? Are you a debate-queen then? Sorry, just had to ask ;-) |
|
|
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:42 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com