Well Mikey
 

Soames123 wrote:

- Mornin' Mr. Burr # 6..

well, although this message is meant for someone else..thought I'd weigh in

- I am not swayed by "W";
or his conservative Cronies in the religous right.
I am a moderate person,
sometimes vote for the Republican,
sometimes vote for the Democrat..

I am also Pro Daughter, Pro Grand Daughter, Pro Choice,
( - Safe choice vs Back Alley Choice.. )
Pro Jobs, Pro Environment, Pro Conservation,
Pro Education
Pro Freedom....

- and Very Much Anti terrorist;

- So John Kerry

Gets
My
Vote..

~Harvey~
Morning,
I also share "many" of you opinions but also feel that your statement
about him "religious right" is maybe a little off base.

I have to go work so I won't be back on line until late tonight.

Have a nice day

Burr
#6

From: N8KDV

So if Joe Stalin were the opposing candidate would you vote for him?



John Kerry's not Joe Stalin. Now, you on the other hand......


Michael Bryant, WA4009SWL
Louisville, KY
R75, S800, RX320, SW77, ICF2010K,
DX398, 7600G, 6800W, RF2200, 7600A
GE SRll, Pro-2006, Pro-2010, Pro-76
(remove "nojunk" to reply)

Michael Bryant wrote:

From: N8KDV

So if Joe Stalin were the opposing candidate would you vote for him?



John Kerry's not Joe Stalin. Now, you on the other hand......

I on the other hand, am not Joe Stalin either.

You though are a lying fabricator!

You should be spending your spare time cruising eBay to see if you can
find that PhD!

In article ,
says...



Michael Bryant wrote:

From: N8KDV

So if Joe Stalin were the opposing candidate would you vote for him?



John Kerry's not Joe Stalin. Now, you on the other hand......

I on the other hand, am not Joe Stalin either.

FDR: "I knew Josef Stalin. Josef Stalin was a close personal
ally of necessity of mine. And you, Sir, are no Josef Stalin!"

^_^

Your hypothetical was also not very apt. Stalin is not running
for President; and it is not a choice between a bungling
incompetant President and a bloody handed, charismatic,
EVEN MORE incompetant modern day Czar (no kidding about Stalin's
incompetance. He gutted almost every aspect of Russian
society, to the point tht Hitler was probably justified in
thinking the USSR would be child's play to defeat. If it
hadn't been for a winter that was horrifically brutal even
by Russian standards and froze the German advance in its
tracks, he probably would have been proved right...)

If you had wanted to make me squirm, instead of an example
as ridiculous as Uncle Joe, you could have asked "If David
Duke, or Madelene O'Hare, or John Ashcroft were running
for President, would you vote for any of them?" Make it
a real question, instead of hyperbole, and then it will be
worth answering.

FW

Frank White wrote:

In article ,
says...



Michael Bryant wrote:

From: N8KDV

So if Joe Stalin were the opposing candidate would you vote for him?



John Kerry's not Joe Stalin. Now, you on the other hand......

I on the other hand, am not Joe Stalin either.

FDR: "I knew Josef Stalin. Josef Stalin was a close personal
ally of necessity of mine. And you, Sir, are no Josef Stalin!"

^_^

Your hypothetical was also not very apt. Stalin is not running
for President; and it is not a choice between a bungling
incompetant President and a bloody handed, charismatic,
EVEN MORE incompetant modern day Czar (no kidding about Stalin's
incompetance. He gutted almost every aspect of Russian
society, to the point tht Hitler was probably justified in
thinking the USSR would be child's play to defeat. If it
hadn't been for a winter that was horrifically brutal even
by Russian standards and froze the German advance in its
tracks, he probably would have been proved right...)

If you had wanted to make me squirm, instead of an example
as ridiculous as Uncle Joe, you could have asked "If David
Duke, or Madelene O'Hare, or John Ashcroft were running
for President, would you vote for any of them?" Make it
a real question, instead of hyperbole, and then it will be
worth answering.

Well essentially you were saying "anybody but Bush".

The question I posed was realistic.

Frank White wrote:
snip

Stalin has not announced that he's running for President,
this year.

Of course, being dead and all, that would be hard for
him...



He could run as a Democrat. :)

snip

In article ,
"Mike Terry" wrote:

Please keep it shortwave guys.

Thanks

Mike

I think we should talk about what an idiot you are. Would that suite you
better?

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

From: "Mark S. Holden"

Stalin has not announced that he's running for President,
this year.

Of course, being dead and all, that would be hard for
him...



He could run as a Democrat. :)

And Hitler could run as a Republican. It would probably be close.


Michael Bryant, WA4009SWL
Louisville, KY
R75, S800, RX320, SW77, ICF2010K,
DX398, 7600G, 6800W, RF2200, 7600A
GE SRll, Pro-2006, Pro-2010, Pro-76
(remove "nojunk" to reply)

Michael Bryant wrote:

From: "Mark S. Holden"

Stalin has not announced that he's running for President,
this year.

Of course, being dead and all, that would be hard for
him...



He could run as a Democrat. :)

And Hitler could run as a Republican. It would probably be close.

Close? Like being close to getting that PhD and just not quite making
it?

From: N8KDV

And Hitler could run as a Republican. It would probably be close.

Close? Like being close to getting that PhD and just not quite making
it?

Like being so close to you being a sentient creature and coming up short.

You 2nd grade one-liners are boring the students, though.


Michael Bryant, WA4009SWL
Louisville, KY
R75, S800, RX320, SW77, ICF2010K,
DX398, 7600G, 6800W, RF2200, 7600A
GE SRll, Pro-2006, Pro-2010, Pro-76
(remove "nojunk" to reply)

Michael Bryant wrote:

From: N8KDV

And Hitler could run as a Republican. It would probably be close.

Close? Like being close to getting that PhD and just not quite making
it?

Like being so close to you being a sentient creature and coming up short.

Like you coming up short in your pursuit of that PhD. So darn short you had
to lie about it Fat Boy?



You 2nd grade one-liners are boring the students, though.

What? The kindergartners don't understand?

Michael Bryant wrote:

From: "Mark S. Holden"


Stalin has not announced that he's running for President,
this year.

Of course, being dead and all, that would be hard for
him...



He could run as a Democrat. :)


And Hitler could run as a Republican. It would probably be close.


Republicans wouldn't support Hitler - but actually, I was thinking about
Mel Carnahan - who was behind in the polls until he died.

I'm not familiar with the political landscape in Missouri, but I know in
certain parts of the country dead people are an important voting block.

= = = ocom (Michael Bryant) wrote in message
= = = ...
From: "Mark S. Holden"

Stalin has not announced that he's running for President,
this year.

Of course, being dead and all, that would be hard for
him...



He could run as a Democrat. :)

And Hitler could run as a Republican. It would probably be close.

MWB - Hitler was 'in-fact' a National Socialist "NAZI"

So... Today in the USofA - Hilter would be a Liberal Democrat.
* Pro-Choice = The Killing of Babys
* Anti-Israel = Anti-Jewish

Just the Facts ~ RHF
..
..

Michael Bryant, WA4009SWL
Louisville, KY
R75, S800, RX320, SW77, ICF2010K,
DX398, 7600G, 6800W, RF2200, 7600A
GE SRll, Pro-2006, Pro-2010, Pro-76
(remove "nojunk" to reply)

"RHF" wrote in message
m...
= = = ocom (Michael Bryant) wrote in message

MWB - Hitler was 'in-fact' a National Socialist "NAZI"

So... Today in the USofA - Hilter would be a Liberal Democrat.
* Pro-Choice = The Killing of Babys
* Anti-Israel = Anti-Jewish

Just the Facts ~ RHF

The Nazis were far from socialists, however.. they were fascists, and hated
the communists (Hitler only made a pact with the Soviets to keep them from
attacking him before he was ready for them)

Good grief, MWB. You actually let them goad you into posting something that
is stupid beyond words.

-- Stinger

"Michael Bryant" wrote in message
...
From: "Mark S. Holden"

Stalin has not announced that he's running for President,
this year.

Of course, being dead and all, that would be hard for
him...



He could run as a Democrat. :)

And Hitler could run as a Republican. It would probably be close.


Michael Bryant, WA4009SWL
Louisville, KY
R75, S800, RX320, SW77, ICF2010K,
DX398, 7600G, 6800W, RF2200, 7600A
GE SRll, Pro-2006, Pro-2010, Pro-76
(remove "nojunk" to reply)

RHF,

Hitler and the Nazis deserve their own special place in hell, and resemble
neither of the popular political parties in the USA. However, you can draw
some interesting parallels between the philosophies of liberal Democrats and
the Politburo of the former USSR.

-- Stinger

"RHF" wrote in message
m...
= = = ocom (Michael Bryant) wrote in message
= = = ...
From: "Mark S. Holden"

Stalin has not announced that he's running for President,
this year.

Of course, being dead and all, that would be hard for
him...



He could run as a Democrat. :)

And Hitler could run as a Republican. It would probably be close.

MWB - Hitler was 'in-fact' a National Socialist "NAZI"

So... Today in the USofA - Hilter would be a Liberal Democrat.
* Pro-Choice = The Killing of Babys
* Anti-Israel = Anti-Jewish

Just the Facts ~ RHF
.
.

Michael Bryant, WA4009SWL
Louisville, KY
R75, S800, RX320, SW77, ICF2010K,
DX398, 7600G, 6800W, RF2200, 7600A
GE SRll, Pro-2006, Pro-2010, Pro-76
(remove "nojunk" to reply)

"Brenda Ann Dyer" wrote in message ...
"RHF" wrote in message
m...
= = = ocom (Michael Bryant) wrote in message

MWB - Hitler was 'in-fact' a National Socialist "NAZI"

So... Today in the USofA - Hilter would be a Liberal Democrat.
* Pro-Choice = The Killing of Babys
* Anti-Israel = Anti-Jewish

Just the Facts ~ RHF

The Nazis were far from socialists, however.. they were fascists, and hated
the communists (Hitler only made a pact with the Soviets to keep them from
attacking him before he was ready for them)

BA,

Whether Governments be they called: Communist, Socialist, or Fascist.

Having the appearance of Theoretical Differences
.... but in-fact having very Practical Similarities.

The Exploitation of the Masses for the Benefit of the Leaders.
[ Total Control by the Few in Power - The Elite. ]

~ RHF

..

From: "Stinger"

Good grief, MWB. You actually let them goad you into posting something that
is stupid beyond words.



Really. Sorry, but there actually were many republicans supporting Hitler
during the 1930's. I think the original statement that Stalin would be a
Democratic nominee is also stupid beyong words.

I wasn't the one starting the stupid analogies, Stinger. How come you always
see it one direction?




Michael Bryant, WA4009SWL
Louisville, KY
R75, S800, RX320, SW77, ICF2010K,
DX398, 7600G, 6800W, RF2200, 7600A
GE SRll, Pro-2006, Pro-2010, Pro-76
(remove "nojunk" to reply)

From: "Stinger"

Hitler and the Nazis deserve their own special place in hell, and resemble
neither of the popular political parties in the USA. However, you can draw
some interesting parallels between the philosophies of liberal Democrats and
the Politburo of the former USSR

Both comparisons are stupid beyond words. Partisan political crap.


Michael Bryant, WA4009SWL
Louisville, KY
R75, S800, RX320, SW77, ICF2010K,
DX398, 7600G, 6800W, RF2200, 7600A
GE SRll, Pro-2006, Pro-2010, Pro-76
(remove "nojunk" to reply)

"Michael Bryant" wrote in message
...
From: "Stinger"

Hitler and the Nazis deserve their own special place in hell, and
resemble
neither of the popular political parties in the USA. However, you can
draw
some interesting parallels between the philosophies of liberal Democrats
and
the Politburo of the former USSR

Both comparisons are stupid beyond words. Partisan political crap.


As I stated in my post, I agree with you on the first point. However, it's
not a stretch at all to see that the liberal elites would be right at home
in the Politburo. It's basically their end-game.

-- Stinger

"Michael Bryant" wrote in message
...
From: "Stinger"

Good grief, MWB. You actually let them goad you into posting something
that
is stupid beyond words.



Really. Sorry, but there actually were many republicans supporting Hitler
during the 1930's. I think the original statement that Stalin would be a
Democratic nominee is also stupid beyong words.

I wasn't the one starting the stupid analogies, Stinger. How come you
always
see it one direction?


I didn't. Please note that I also criticized RHF's post that was the mirror
image of yours.

However, I did note an analogy between the Politburo and liberal elites.

No doubt, I'm sure I do tend to see it one direction, though -- guilty as
charged, Mike.

I think it's just human nature. When I see something presented in an
outrageous manner that I really disagree with, it really gets my attention.
But when I see something in a similar vein that has at least some reasonable
content that I agree with along with some hyperbole, I usually just wish
that the poster had toned it down a bit. I guess that's just the nature of
UseNet.

Have a good evening,

-- Stinger

From: "Stinger"

As I stated in my post, I agree with you on the first point. However, it's
not a stretch at all to see that the liberal elites would be right at home
in the Politburo. It's basically their end-game.



Bull****. In reality, the Democrats are no closer to the Politburo than the
Republicans are to the SS.

Your inference that Democrats open the door to communism is simply offensive.
You won't sway many voters with that kind of rhetoric.


Michael Bryant, WA4009SWL
Louisville, KY
R75, S800, RX320, SW77, ICF2010K,
DX398, 7600G, 6800W, RF2200, 7600A
GE SRll, Pro-2006, Pro-2010, Pro-76
(remove "nojunk" to reply)

"Michael Bryant" wrote in message
...
From: "Stinger"

As I stated in my post, I agree with you on the first point. However,
it's
not a stretch at all to see that the liberal elites would be right at
home
in the Politburo. It's basically their end-game.



Bull****. In reality, the Democrats are no closer to the Politburo than
the
Republicans are to the SS.

Your inference that Democrats open the door to communism is simply
offensive.
You won't sway many voters with that kind of rhetoric.


Not Communism, Michael -- Socialism. There's no way you can say that people
like Hillary Clinton and John Kerry are not socialists -- look at their
voting records, and (more importantly) their agendas. At least be honest
about who they are.

-- Stinger

From: "Stinger"

Not Communism, Michael -- Socialism. There's no way you can say that people
like Hillary Clinton and John Kerry are not socialists -- look at their
voting records, and (more importantly) their agendas. At least be honest
about who they are.


The old mantra of the Republicans really hasn't changed since the 1950's. Real
socialists would laugh at your ridiculous assumption that Hillary is the
vanguard of creeping socialism.

Can't you see that folks like Cheney and Ashcroft have the same agenda of
social control advocated by the German fascists?
Can't you be honest about their agendas?


Michael Bryant, WA4009SWL
Louisville, KY
R75, S800, RX320, SW77, ICF2010K,
DX398, 7600G, 6800W, RF2200, 7600A
GE SRll, Pro-2006, Pro-2010, Pro-76
(remove "nojunk" to reply)

"Michael Bryant" wrote in message
...
From: "Stinger"

Not Communism, Michael -- Socialism. There's no way you can say that
people
like Hillary Clinton and John Kerry are not socialists -- look at their
voting records, and (more importantly) their agendas. At least be honest
about who they are.


The old mantra of the Republicans really hasn't changed since the 1950's.
Real
socialists would laugh at your ridiculous assumption that Hillary is the
vanguard of creeping socialism.

Can't you see that folks like Cheney and Ashcroft have the same agenda of
social control advocated by the German fascists?
Can't you be honest about their agendas?



They definitely would not laugh at Hillary, and your "real Socialists" would
see her, Kerry, and Teddy K. as kindred spirits.

As for any "social control" agenda, the world has changed. The difference
is that the guys we have in there now took any new "social control" (your
words - not mine) powers reluctantly, while those on the left hunger for it
and scheme to socialize our government if they get the chance.

-- Stinger

STINGER,

The Liberal 'left' always likes to cite Hitler as the EVIL ONE !

Hitler - NAZI - Fascism * Estimate 16 Million Killed

But, the Left has its own Monsters who Killed Many More in the
Name of the 'just cause' of World Communism:

Pol Pot - Communism * Estimate 4 Million Killed

Mao - Cultural Revolution - Communism * Estimate 32 Million Killed

Stalin - Communism * Estimate 40 Million Killed

* Note: Murdered Directly, Starved to Death, or Force into
Slave Labor Camps to Work and Die.

ADD a few Acient Killers like Ghengis Khan, Kublai Khan,
Atilla the Hun and Tamerlane.

Check-Out Hyper-History:
http://www.hyperhistory.com/online_n...n2/hist_6.html


Just the Facts ~ RHF
..
..
= = = "Stinger" wrote in message
= = = ...
RHF,

Hitler and the Nazis deserve their own special place in hell, and resemble
neither of the popular political parties in the USA. However, you can draw
some interesting parallels between the philosophies of liberal Democrats and
the Politburo of the former USSR.

-- Stinger

"RHF" wrote in message
m...
= = = ocom (Michael Bryant) wrote in message
= = = ...
From: "Mark S. Holden"

Stalin has not announced that he's running for President,
this year.

Of course, being dead and all, that would be hard for
him...



He could run as a Democrat. :)

And Hitler could run as a Republican. It would probably be close.

MWB - Hitler was 'in-fact' a National Socialist "NAZI"

So... Today in the USofA - Hilter would be a Liberal Democrat.
* Pro-Choice = The Killing of Babys
* Anti-Israel = Anti-Jewish

Just the Facts ~ RHF
.
.

Michael Bryant, WA4009SWL
Louisville, KY
R75, S800, RX320, SW77, ICF2010K,
DX398, 7600G, 6800W, RF2200, 7600A
GE SRll, Pro-2006, Pro-2010, Pro-76
(remove "nojunk" to reply)

Michael Bryant wrote:

From: "Stinger"

Not Communism, Michael -- Socialism. There's no way you can say that people
like Hillary Clinton and John Kerry are not socialists -- look at their
voting records, and (more importantly) their agendas. At least be honest
about who they are.


The old mantra of the Republicans really hasn't changed since the 1950's. Real
socialists would laugh at your ridiculous assumption that Hillary is the
vanguard of creeping socialism.

Can't you see that folks like Cheney and Ashcroft have the same agenda of
social control advocated by the German fascists?
Can't you be honest about their agendas?

Why can't you be honest Fat Boy?

From: "Stinger"

As for any "social control" agenda, the world has changed. The difference
is that the guys we have in there now took any new "social control" (your
words - not mine) powers reluctantly, while those on the left hunger for it
and scheme to socialize our government if they get the chance.


So Bush and Ashcroft's constant appeals for expanded Patriot Act powers
demonstrate "reluctance" on their parts? Good luck selling that one!


Michael Bryant, WA4009SWL
Louisville, KY
R75, S800, RX320, SW77, ICF2010K,
DX398, 7600G, 6800W, RF2200, 7600A
GE SRll, Pro-2006, Pro-2010, Pro-76
(remove "nojunk" to reply)

Michael Bryant wrote:

From: "Stinger"

As for any "social control" agenda, the world has changed. The difference
is that the guys we have in there now took any new "social control" (your
words - not mine) powers reluctantly, while those on the left hunger for it
and scheme to socialize our government if they get the chance.


So Bush and Ashcroft's constant appeals for expanded Patriot Act powers
demonstrate "reluctance" on their parts? Good luck selling that one!

The Patriot Act should include the immediate arrest of any academic who lies
about his/her educational credentials.

Lying educators are terrorists!

From: "Stinger"

"Michael Bryant" wrote in message

Real
socialists would laugh at your ridiculous assumption that Hillary is the
vanguard of creeping socialism.


They definitely would not laugh at Hillary, and your "real Socialists" would
see her, Kerry, and Teddy K. as kindred spirits.



Actually, I konw several socialists and none of them have identified Clinton or
Kennedy as "kindred spirits". A few support Ralph Nader, but I've never seen a
real socialist support a Democrat. To them there's not a dime's worth or
difference between the two major parties.

As for any "social control" agenda, the world has changed. The difference
is that the guys we have in there now took any new "social control" (your
words - not mine) powers reluctantly, while those on the left hunger for it
and scheme to socialize our government if they get the chance.


I've given the socialists I know a lot of crap for not supporting Democratic
candidates. But if a socialist would run on the platform of providing universal
health care, I'd probably vote for them.

Just as you'd probably vote for a fascist that suggested "reluctant" ways of
enhancing social control in this changed world.

Oops, I forgot. You already are.


Michael Bryant, WA4009SWL
Louisville, KY
R75, S800, RX320, SW77, ICF2010K,
DX398, 7600G, 6800W, RF2200, 7600A
GE SRll, Pro-2006, Pro-2010, Pro-76
(remove "nojunk" to reply)

From: N8KDV

The Patriot Act should include the immediate arrest of any academic who lies
about his/her educational credentials.

Lying educators are terrorists!



Yeah, lying DXers are also threatening. Any more FBI visits, Steve?


Michael Bryant, WA4009SWL
Louisville, KY
R75, S800, RX320, SW77, ICF2010K,
DX398, 7600G, 6800W, RF2200, 7600A
GE SRll, Pro-2006, Pro-2010, Pro-76
(remove "nojunk" to reply)

Michael Bryant wrote:

From: N8KDV

The Patriot Act should include the immediate arrest of any academic who lies
about his/her educational credentials.

Lying educators are terrorists!



Yeah, lying DXers are also threatening.

And what have I lied about Fat Boy?

Having a PhD?

From: N8KDV

And what have I lied about Fat Boy?

Pol Pot
Being Employed
Talking to people at Weber State

And probably your Diego Garcia logs!


Michael Bryant, WA4009SWL
Louisville, KY
R75, S800, RX320, SW77, ICF2010K,
DX398, 7600G, 6800W, RF2200, 7600A
GE SRll, Pro-2006, Pro-2010, Pro-76
(remove "nojunk" to reply)

Michael Bryant wrote:

From: N8KDV

And what have I lied about Fat Boy?

Pol Pot

What did I lie about?

Being Employed

What did I lie about?

Talking to people at Weber State

What did I lie about?

And probably your Diego Garcia logs!

I'd like to extend an invitation to anyone out there to come over here
and hang out for a while and we'll listen to 'em! While they are here
they can check out my QSL's too!

Keep trying to fool yourself Fat Boy!

Facts are facts! You don't have a PhD!

From: N8KDV

Facts are facts! You don't have a PhD!

And what facts can you provide? All I've admitted was not having completed one
in 2001.

Any facts you have that prove I don't have one now?

Be careful.




Michael Bryant, WA4009SWL
Louisville, KY
R75, S800, RX320, SW77, ICF2010K,
DX398, 7600G, 6800W, RF2200, 7600A
GE SRll, Pro-2006, Pro-2010, Pro-76
(remove "nojunk" to reply)

Michael Bryant wrote:

From: N8KDV

Facts are facts! You don't have a PhD!

And what facts can you provide? All I've admitted was not having completed one
in 2001.

You lied about it... all the facts I need Fat Boy!

Any facts you have that prove I don't have one now?

Guess it's up to you now to actually PROVE that you do have one!

Be careful.

Gonna call one of your 'lawyer relatives'?

LOL!

Michael Bryant wrote:

And probably your Diego Garcia logs!

They were just on at 1310 Fat Boy... on 13254 USB

Michael Bryant wrote:

Be careful.

You be careful too Fat Boy... don't choke on those Cheeto's!

N8KDV wrote:

Michael Bryant wrote:

And probably your Diego Garcia logs!

They were just on at 1310 Fat Boy... on 13254 USB

And by golly Fat Boy, they were just on again at 1338!

Amazing ain't it!