** NEW ZEALAND. We are now using 9885 kHz from 0550 to 0750 daily
beaming to Samoa and the Cook Islands (RNZI website April 11 via DXLD)

The above times are NZ time. So would be 1750 to 1950 UT. As of April
17 a new frequency of 9845 will replace 9885 from 1750 to 1950. 9885
remains at the other listed times (Bernie O`Shea, ON, DX LISTENING
DIGEST)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Steve
Holland, MI
Drake R7, R8 and R8B

http://www.iserv.net/~n8kdv/dxpage.htm

In article ,
N8KDV wrote:

** NEW ZEALAND. We are now using 9885 kHz from 0550 to 0750 daily
beaming to Samoa and the Cook Islands (RNZI website April 11 via DXLD)

The above times are NZ time. So would be 1750 to 1950 UT. As of April
17 a new frequency of 9845 will replace 9885 from 1750 to 1950. 9885
remains at the other listed times (Bernie O`Shea, ON, DX LISTENING
DIGEST)

And while we are on this subject how is 15720 working for people? The
15720 frequency is better than 15265 was and 17675 was better than 15720
for me.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

Telamon wrote in
:

In article ,
N8KDV wrote:

** NEW ZEALAND. We are now using 9885 kHz from 0550 to 0750 daily
beaming to Samoa and the Cook Islands (RNZI website April 11 via DXLD)

The above times are NZ time. So would be 1750 to 1950 UT. As of April
17 a new frequency of 9845 will replace 9885 from 1750 to 1950. 9885
remains at the other listed times (Bernie O`Shea, ON, DX LISTENING
DIGEST)

And while we are on this subject how is 15720 working for people? The
15720 frequency is better than 15265 was and 17675 was better than 15720
for me.

I'm in Los Angeles. 17675 was very good for my location. I'm not enjoying
15720 very much at all (QRM and diminished signal strength); later in the
evening (about 0400) 9615 works much better for me. Still not as good as a
few months ago, but that's the ionosphere for you....

----