| Page 1 of 2 | 1 | 2 |
|
|
Well Burry
From: "T. Early"
And to think, some people actually find the anti-Bush crowd condescending and intellectually arrogant. The nerve! I got a hoot out of listening to Republicans on WHAS-840 give the chimp's speech a C grade because even they were upset at his inability to stribng unrehearsed sentences together.... As a speech instructor, GW Bush is an embarassment to his nation. Michael Bryant, WA4009SWL Louisville, KY R75, S800, RX320, SW77, ICF2010K, DX398, 7600G, 6800W, RF2200, 7600A GE SRll, Pro-2006, Pro-2010, Pro-76 (remove "nojunk" to reply) |
N8KDV schrieb: And then hopefully ... Take a bath soon and beware of the whales. |
Michael Bryant wrote: From: "T. Early" And to think, some people actually find the anti-Bush crowd condescending and intellectually arrogant. The nerve! I got a hoot out of listening to Republicans on WHAS-840 give the chimp's speech a C grade because even they were upset at his inability to stribng unrehearsed sentences together.... As a speech instructor, GW Bush is an embarassment to his nation. And you are an embarrassment to the academic profession oh PhD challenged one! |
|
|
|
|
|
Michael Bryant wrote: From: N8KDV Do the British spell embarassment with tow 'R's? Oh by the way... most of us spell it 'two'. Maybe you should spell words in American English. After all, you are the good humour man.... Darn right Fat Boy, I am indeed the good humour man. I don't lie and fabricate either! |
"Michael Bryant" wrote in message ... From: "T. Early" And to think, some people actually find the anti-Bush crowd condescending and intellectually arrogant. The nerve! I got a hoot out of listening to Republicans on WHAS-840 give the chimp's speech a C grade because even they were upset at his inability to stribng unrehearsed sentences together.... As a speech instructor, GW Bush is an embarassment to his nation. Before you snipped the original post, it would have been more apparent that the discussion and my comment had zero to do with Bush's ability as a public speaker, and far more to do with calling the POTUS--a former governor of Texas and graduate of major universities-- a "chimp" in general. It's the kind of comment that those on the left will -never- understand is the reason "average" Americans are so alienated from the academic and entertainment elites in the country. While I agree he's far from a top notch public speaker, he is also far from an embarrassment to the nation because he exhibits firmness, resolve, and even sincerity (at least for a politician), something his predecessor (who actually -was- an embarrassment to the nation, as we now know) had no concept of despite his ability to appear slick when speaking in public. Fortunately, most appear to realize that there is more to a president's ability to communicate than "grades" handed out by those who were clueless about his appeal three years ago, were clueless about it at the mid term elections, and are still clueless about it now. |
"T. Early" wrote: "Michael Bryant" wrote in message ... From: "T. Early" And to think, some people actually find the anti-Bush crowd condescending and intellectually arrogant. The nerve! I got a hoot out of listening to Republicans on WHAS-840 give the chimp's speech a C grade because even they were upset at his inability to stribng unrehearsed sentences together.... As a speech instructor, GW Bush is an embarassment to his nation. Before you snipped the original post, it would have been more apparent that the discussion and my comment had zero to do with Bush's ability as a public speaker, and far more to do with calling the POTUS--a former governor of Texas and graduate of major universities-- a "chimp" in general. It's the kind of comment that those on the left will -never- understand is the reason "average" Americans are so alienated from the academic and entertainment elites in the country. While I agree he's far from a top notch public speaker, he is also far from an embarrassment to the nation because he exhibits firmness, resolve, and even sincerity (at least for a politician), something his predecessor (who actually -was- an embarrassment to the nation, as we now know) had no concept of despite his ability to appear slick when speaking in public. Fortunately, most appear to realize that there is more to a president's ability to communicate than "grades" handed out by those who were clueless about his appeal three years ago, were clueless about it at the mid term elections, and are still clueless about it now. Damn, I wish I could express myself the way you do! Well stated! |
"N8KDV" wrote | Do the British spell embarassment with tow 'R's? Do Americans spell "two" as "tow?" Boggling, indeed. Pot, kettle, black, and all of that. 73, Steve Lawrence KA0PMD Burnsville, MN --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.634 / Virus Database: 406 - Release Date: 3/18/04 |
"N8KDV" wrote | I'm voting for Bush solely based upon the fact that a guy who lied about having a | PhD is voting for Kerry! That would certainly be a good qualifier for me. 73, Steve Lawrence KA0PMD Burnsville, MN --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.634 / Virus Database: 406 - Release Date: 3/18/04 |
|
In article ,
ocom (Michael Bryant) wrote: From: "-=jd=-" All usenet BS aside - seriously, where have you heard that kind of rhetoric? Most of the negativity in the campaign that I have observed has come from the democrats - which, I might add is not unusual for the challenger, regardless of political party. Uh gee, we had a poster advocating shooting liberals in this NG, yesterday. We got a frequent poster using the name CRUSHTHELEFT. Some of the eprsnal attacks on Kerry are off the scale. Don't look now, but your political myopia is showing.... Gee Mikey don't look now but you have no credibility. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
"Stephen M.H. Lawrence" wrote ...
"N8KDV" wrote | I'm voting for Bush solely based upon the fact that a guy who lied about having a | PhD is voting for Kerry! That would certainly be a good qualifier for me. 73, Steve Lawrence KA0PMD Burnsville, MN One problem with Kerry, Bro. Lawrence - he didn't invent the internet. |
LW wrote:
"Stephen M.H. Lawrence" wrote ... "N8KDV" wrote | I'm voting for Bush solely based upon the fact that a guy who lied about having a | PhD is voting for Kerry! That would certainly be a good qualifier for me. 73, Steve Lawrence KA0PMD Burnsville, MN One problem with Kerry, Bro. Lawrence - he didn't invent the internet. Gore never said he did either. -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
|
= = = "T. Early" wrote in message
= = = ... "Michael Bryant" wrote in message ... From: "T. Early" And to think, some people actually find the anti-Bush crowd condescending and intellectually arrogant. The nerve! I got a hoot out of listening to Republicans on WHAS-840 give the chimp's speech a C grade because even they were upset at his inability to stribng unrehearsed sentences together.... As a speech instructor, GW Bush is an embarassment to his nation. Before you snipped the original post, it would have been more apparent that the discussion and my comment had zero to do with Bush's ability as a public speaker, and far more to do with calling the POTUS--a former governor of Texas and graduate of major universities-- a "chimp" in general. It's the kind of comment that those on the left will -never- understand is the reason "average" Americans are so alienated from the academic and entertainment elites in the country. While I agree he's far from a top notch public speaker, he is also far from an embarrassment to the nation because he exhibits firmness, resolve, and even sincerity (at least for a politician), something his predecessor (who actually -was- an embarrassment to the nation, as we now know) had no concept of despite his ability to appear slick when speaking in public. Fortunately, most appear to realize that there is more to a president's ability to communicate than "grades" handed out by those who were clueless about his appeal three years ago, were clueless about it at the mid term elections, and are still clueless about it now. TE, Just like "Mister Flip-Flop" John'f' Kerry :-} The 'chimp' label is just one more example of Fuzzy Logic of the Liberal Left Elitists [.] One More Example of "MWB"s Hate Speech directed to the current President of the United Statesa of America. (POTUS) ~ RHF .. |
Michael Bryant wrote: From: "-=jd=-" All usenet BS aside - seriously, where have you heard that kind of rhetoric? Most of the negativity in the campaign that I have observed has come from the democrats - which, I might add is not unusual for the challenger, regardless of political party. Uh gee, we had a poster advocating shooting liberals in this NG, yesterday. We got a frequent poster using the name CRUSHTHELEFT. Some of the eprsnal attacks on Kerry are off the scale. Don't look now, but your political myopia is showing.... And your fabrication of a nonexistent PhD is showing too Fat Boy! Perhaps you've fabricated that 'family' too! Guess we'll find out! |
|
|
|
Michael Bryant wrote: From: N8KDV And your fabrication of a nonexistent PhD is showing too Fat Boy! Perhaps you've fabricated that 'family' too! Guess we'll find out! Well, there goes the level of rhetoric. The good humour man seems to have awoken. Shoot any liberals, yet, Steve? Call any 'lawyer relatives' this morning Fat Boy? |
Michael Bryant wrote: From: N8KDV And your fabrication of a nonexistent PhD is showing too Fat Boy! Perhaps you've fabricated that 'family' too! Guess we'll find out! Well, there goes the level of rhetoric. The good humour man seems to have awoken. Shoot any liberals, yet, Steve? Nope, but I am calling for the imprisonment of PhD fabricators! |
"T. Early" wrote in message ... "Michael Bryant" wrote in message ... From: "T. Early" And to think, some people actually find the anti-Bush crowd condescending and intellectually arrogant. The nerve! I got a hoot out of listening to Republicans on WHAS-840 give the chimp's speech a C grade because even they were upset at his inability to stribng unrehearsed sentences together.... As a speech instructor, GW Bush is an embarassment to his nation. Before you snipped the original post, it would have been more apparent that the discussion and my comment had zero to do with Bush's ability as a public speaker, and far more to do with calling the POTUS--a former governor of Texas and graduate of major universities-- a "chimp" in general. It's the kind of comment that those on the left will -never- understand is the reason "average" Americans are so alienated from the academic and entertainment elites in the country. While I agree he's far from a top notch public speaker, he is also far from an embarrassment to the nation because he exhibits firmness, resolve, and even sincerity (at least for a politician), something his predecessor (who actually -was- an embarrassment to the nation, as we now know) had no concept of despite his ability to appear slick when speaking in public. Fortunately, most appear to realize that there is more to a president's ability to communicate than "grades" handed out by those who were clueless about his appeal three years ago, were clueless about it at the mid term elections, and are still clueless about it now. Bravo, Mr. Early! -- Stinger |
"-=jd=-" wrote in message ... On Wed 14 Apr 2004 10:13:20p, ocom (Michael Bryant) wrote in message : {snippage} Is there any hope for a middle ground, Mr Early? Or do you really believe Bush's electoral victory will give you the ability to totally crush and kill the left, which is, of course, the rhetoric used by your side? Darn, I should have made that bet with someone... MWB, Do you honestly think that conservatives want to re-elect Bush mainly to "totally crush and kill the left"? All usenet BS aside - seriously, where have you heard that kind of rhetoric? Most of the negativity in the campaign that I have observed has come from the democrats - which, I might add is not unusual for the challenger, regardless of political party. -=jd=- -- My Current Disposable Email: (Remove YOUR HAT to reply directly) JD, Actually, you pinpoint the problem. While the conservatives try to fix the problems, with the liberals it's all about a desperate attempt get the power back (that they deservedly lost). These people are more than willing to work against the greater good of the American people if it means that it might result in getting their coveted power back. It's simply disgusting. -- Stinger |
"Michael Bryant" wrote in message ... From: N8KDV And your fabrication of a nonexistent PhD is showing too Fat Boy! Perhaps you've fabricated that 'family' too! Guess we'll find out! Well, there goes the level of rhetoric. The good humour man seems to have awoken. Shoot any liberals, yet, Steve? Michael Bryant, WA4009SWL Louisville, KY R75, S800, RX320, SW77, ICF2010K, DX398, 7600G, 6800W, RF2200, 7600A GE SRll, Pro-2006, Pro-2010, Pro-76 (remove "nojunk" to reply) Damn! How did I miss the season opening? (Note to Michael -- that's a JOKE. You have to do disclaimers for some folks.) -- Stinger |
Michael Bryant wrote: From: N8KDV lets get real - Or is this just one more False Claim ~ RHF I'm sure he'll make many, many more false claims! It's his nature. More proof that there's not really a whole lot of difference between Steve Lare and RHF. Steve may even get the nod because he's pretty clear. RHF tries to hide his spiritual ugliness in his eye candy. What ever you say 'Doctor'... LOL! |
|
"N8KDV" wrote in message ... "T. Early" wrote: "Michael Bryant" wrote in message ... From: "T. Early" And to think, some people actually find the anti-Bush crowd condescending and intellectually arrogant. The nerve! I got a hoot out of listening to Republicans on WHAS-840 give the chimp's speech a C grade because even they were upset at his inability to stribng unrehearsed sentences together.... As a speech instructor, GW Bush is an embarassment to his nation. Before you snipped the original post, it would have been more apparent that the discussion and my comment had zero to do with Bush's ability as a public speaker, and far more to do with calling the POTUS--a former governor of Texas and graduate of major universities-- a "chimp" in general. It's the kind of comment that those on the left will -never- understand is the reason "average" Americans are so alienated from the academic and entertainment elites in the country. While I agree he's far from a top notch public speaker, he is also far from an embarrassment to the nation because he exhibits firmness, resolve, and even sincerity (at least for a politician), something his predecessor (who actually -was- an embarrassment to the nation, as we now know) had no concept of despite his ability to appear slick when speaking in public. Fortunately, most appear to realize that there is more to a president's ability to communicate than "grades" handed out by those who were clueless about his appeal three years ago, were clueless about it at the mid term elections, and are still clueless about it now. Damn, I wish I could express myself the way you do! Well stated! Anyone who thinks Kerry is sincere is totally clueless. Well said T Early. |
Hi Steve,
Are you a dxer? Hey, getting two Purple Hearts from a scratch requires some very ingenious wheedling. 73, Steve Lawrence KA0PMD Burnsville, Minnesota |
Michael Bryant wrote: From: N8KDV And you are an embarrassment to the academic profession oh PhD challenged one! Do the British spell embarassment with tow 'R's? Everybody spells embarrassment with two "r"s. It's the correct spelling. By the way as a speech instructor, doesn't the sentence "As a speech instructor, GW Bush is an embarassment to his nation" seem a little off to you, besides the spelling mistake? Bush has had a lot of jobs, but speech instructor is not one of them. |
As for incivility, I distinctly remember GHW Bush referring to Clinton and Gore as "bozos" during a televised debate back in '92. Regardless of what you think of them, calling your opponents "bozos" in a national broadcast is not exactly a mark of civility. I don't think it's fair to blame the entire left for MWB's comments, and I don't think the right is blameless when it comes to crude insulting characterizations. T. Early wrote: "Michael Bryant" wrote in message ... From: "T. Early" And to think, some people actually find the anti-Bush crowd condescending and intellectually arrogant. The nerve! I got a hoot out of listening to Republicans on WHAS-840 give the chimp's speech a C grade because even they were upset at his inability to stribng unrehearsed sentences together.... As a speech instructor, GW Bush is an embarassment to his nation. Before you snipped the original post, it would have been more apparent that the discussion and my comment had zero to do with Bush's ability as a public speaker, and far more to do with calling the POTUS--a former governor of Texas and graduate of major universities-- a "chimp" in general. It's the kind of comment that those on the left will -never- understand is the reason "average" Americans are so alienated from the academic and entertainment elites in the country. While I agree he's far from a top notch public speaker, he is also far from an embarrassment to the nation because he exhibits firmness, resolve, and even sincerity (at least for a politician), something his predecessor (who actually -was- an embarrassment to the nation, as we now know) had no concept of despite his ability to appear slick when speaking in public. Fortunately, most appear to realize that there is more to a president's ability to communicate than "grades" handed out by those who were clueless about his appeal three years ago, were clueless about it at the mid term elections, and are still clueless about it now. |
Larry Ozarow wrote: Michael Bryant wrote: From: N8KDV And you are an embarrassment to the academic profession oh PhD challenged one! Do the British spell embarassment with tow 'R's? Everybody spells embarrassment with two "r"s. It's the correct spelling. By the way as a speech instructor, doesn't the sentence "As a speech instructor, GW Bush is an embarassment to his nation" seem a little off to you, besides the spelling mistake? Bush has had a lot of jobs, but speech instructor is not one of them. I don't think Bryant is really a speech instructor either. |
Larry Ozarow wrote: As for incivility, I distinctly remember GHW Bush referring to Clinton and Gore as "bozos" during a televised debate back in '92. Regardless of what you think of them, calling your opponents "bozos" in a national broadcast is not exactly a mark of civility. I don't think it's fair to blame the entire left for MWB's comments, and I don't think the right is blameless when it comes to crude insulting characterizations. Bozo is a beloved character. Perhaps GHW Bush was refering to Clinton and Gore as such. |
Keep it radio lads!
"Larry Ozarow" wrote in message ... Michael Bryant wrote: From: N8KDV And you are an embarrassment to the academic profession oh PhD challenged one! Do the British spell embarassment with tow 'R's? Everybody spells embarrassment with two "r"s. It's the correct spelling. By the way as a speech instructor, doesn't the sentence "As a speech instructor, GW Bush is an embarassment to his nation" seem a little off to you, besides the spelling mistake? Bush has had a lot of jobs, but speech instructor is not one of them. |
I'd say I'm more of a program listener
(hence my interest in US talk radio) 73, Steve Lawrence KA0PMD Burnsville, Minnesota "Mike Terry" wrote in message ... | Hi Steve, | | Are you a dxer? | | Hey, getting two Purple Hearts from a scratch | requires some very ingenious wheedling. | | 73, | | Steve Lawrence | KA0PMD | Burnsville, Minnesota | | --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.634 / Virus Database: 406 - Release Date: 3/18/04 |
|
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:09 AM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com