Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old April 16th 04, 07:16 PM
Corbin Ray
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Bearcat, you make a good point. I have spent about $300 dollars on Chinese
radios in the past two months. And I admit, I could have gotten a $300 radio
for my money.

But there's no $300 radio out there that I want. I either already have it or
I had it and sold it.

What my $300 has gotten me is eight experiences of getting a new radio. You
know, the pre-buy research, the actual purchase itself, the anticipation
during shipping, then actually opening the box, smelling the new radio
smell, putting in the batteries, and finally turning it on for the first
time and seeing just how good it picks up. I've been able to do that eight
times in the past two months!!! If I had bought just one radio, then I would
have gotten just one new radio experience.

Of my eight new radios, I have given away two, sold two, and have kept four.
The one radio that disappointed me the most was the Tecsun R-333. I kept it,
but it's really a sorry radio. My two favorites of the new bunch are the
Degen 1102 and the Tecsun PL-230. The 1102 has the best performance, but I
live in a house with four computers all networked with WI-FI and cable
internet (originating from my room), and the 1102 seems to be more affected
by all that noise, especially after I turn off my computer and go to bed.
And even though the 230 isn't as sensitive as the 1102, it seems to have a
much lower noise floor, and I can actually listen to some stations on it
that are drowned out on my 1102. That doesn't make sense, but it's just the
way I perceive it. Plus, to my ear, the 230's speaker seems to be less tinny
and less tiring to listen to. And at night, when a station fades out on the
1102, noise is pulled up in its place. On the 230, the AGC must be less
severe, because it actually allows some fade. That is helpful if I am trying
to go to sleep.

Bottom line, I didn't get a $300 radio for my $300 investment. But I did get
eight radios that have given me thousands of dollars worth of enjoyment so
far, and I hope to keep right on playing with my new radios, right up until
they -- or I -- wear completely out.


  #2   Report Post  
Old April 16th 04, 08:17 PM
Jim Hackett
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Corbin, I agree with about 99.99% of what you say. I too, have to buy EVERY
stinking radio to hit the market. Each one is a little like Xmas! Where we
differ is I think my 333 is GREAT! The 1102 is ok, and my biggest
disappointment was the Degen DE-105. Actually, the Bell&Howell was worse
but it only cost like $10. I think I paid close to $50 for the DE-105.
Real disappointment....


"Corbin Ray" wrote in message
...
Bearcat, you make a good point. I have spent about $300 dollars on Chinese
radios in the past two months. And I admit, I could have gotten a $300

radio
for my money.

But there's no $300 radio out there that I want. I either already have it

or
I had it and sold it.

What my $300 has gotten me is eight experiences of getting a new radio.

You
know, the pre-buy research, the actual purchase itself, the anticipation
during shipping, then actually opening the box, smelling the new radio
smell, putting in the batteries, and finally turning it on for the first
time and seeing just how good it picks up. I've been able to do that eight
times in the past two months!!! If I had bought just one radio, then I

would
have gotten just one new radio experience.

Of my eight new radios, I have given away two, sold two, and have kept

four.
The one radio that disappointed me the most was the Tecsun R-333. I kept

it,
but it's really a sorry radio. My two favorites of the new bunch are the
Degen 1102 and the Tecsun PL-230. The 1102 has the best performance, but I
live in a house with four computers all networked with WI-FI and cable
internet (originating from my room), and the 1102 seems to be more

affected
by all that noise, especially after I turn off my computer and go to bed.
And even though the 230 isn't as sensitive as the 1102, it seems to have a
much lower noise floor, and I can actually listen to some stations on it
that are drowned out on my 1102. That doesn't make sense, but it's just

the
way I perceive it. Plus, to my ear, the 230's speaker seems to be less

tinny
and less tiring to listen to. And at night, when a station fades out on

the
1102, noise is pulled up in its place. On the 230, the AGC must be less
severe, because it actually allows some fade. That is helpful if I am

trying
to go to sleep.

Bottom line, I didn't get a $300 radio for my $300 investment. But I did

get
eight radios that have given me thousands of dollars worth of enjoyment so
far, and I hope to keep right on playing with my new radios, right up

until
they -- or I -- wear completely out.




  #3   Report Post  
Old April 17th 04, 05:15 PM
Corbin Ray
 
Posts: n/a
Default

The R-333 had the potential to be a good little radio. I think mine might
have just been a lemon. But since I paid only $15 for the radio, but also
$15 for shipping, there was no advantage in returning it. And I still don't
regret buying it.


  #4   Report Post  
Old April 18th 04, 09:27 AM
GO BEARCATS
 
Posts: n/a
Default

But there's no $300 radio out there that I want. I either already have it or
I had it and sold it.


Fair enough Corbin :-)

What my $300 has gotten me is eight experiences of getting a new radio. You
know, the pre-buy research, the actual purchase itself, the anticipation
during shipping, then actually opening the box, smelling the new radio
smell, putting in the batteries, and


inally turning it on for the first
time and seeing just how good it picks up. I've been able to do that eight
times in the past two months!!! If I had bought just one radio, then I would
have gotten just one new radio experience.


LOL, indeed. I know the feeling well. Matter of fact, never mind. ;-) But
well said.

Bottom line, I didn't get a $300 radio for my $300 investment. But I did get
eight radios that have given me thousands of dollars worth of enjoyment so
far, and I hope to keep right on playing with my new radios, right up until


they -- or I -- wear completely out.

Question answered. Good post Corbin. Don't forget your antenas now, be a good
dxer and have good antennas. ;-) You can still receive those warm fuzzy
feelings waitin' for an antenna in the mail.

~*~*Monitoring The AirWaves~*~
*****GO BEARCATS*****
Hammarlund HQ129X /Heathkit Q Multiplier
Hammarlund HQ140X
Multiple GE P-780's(GREAT BCB Radios)
RCA Victor *Strato- World*
RCA Victor RJC77W-K(Walnut Grain)
1942 Zenith Wave Magnet 6G 601M
Cathedral/ Ross#2311/Rhapsody-MultiBand
DX100/394/398/399/402
OMGS Transistor Eight/Realistic 12-1451
Henry Kloss Model One/Bell+Howell
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
Alpha Delta DX Sloper 57ft.
600ft. 12AWG. (non-terminated)
120ft. 12 AWG Sloper
2 Radio Shack Loop Antennas
Radio Shack Amplified Antenna
30X30 DiamondLoop(six section 830pf Cap)
* Diamond Loop mounted to Lazy Susan TurnTable*





Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1402 ­ June 25, 2004 Radionews Policy 1 June 26th 04 02:07 AM
209 English-language HF Broadcasts audible in NE US (04-APR-04) Albert P. Belle Isle Shortwave 0 April 5th 04 05:20 AM
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1379 – January 16, 2004 Radionews CB 0 January 18th 04 09:36 PM
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1379 – January 16, 2004 Radionews General 0 January 18th 04 09:34 PM
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1379 – January 16, 2004 Radionews Dx 0 January 18th 04 09:34 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:13 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017