Look, you're just not fully informed, and I can understand that. What is
proposed is simply something that is already going on in both U.S. and
Canada - arbitration, whose purpose is to help free the courts to deal with
more serious cases. There are already other groups doing this, and allowing
Islamic groups the same opportunity really changes nothing. It's
understandable that people who read only part of the reporting, or who rely
on the superficial VOA-like reporting on U.S. cable news channels are going
to be misled about what is really happening. It is NOT a situation where
fundamentalist Islamic law will become the law of the land. It's just a
dispute resolution mechanism, not really much different than having people
agree to go before a TV judge and to abide by that celebrity judge's
decision. The principle is exactly the same.



"N8KDV" wrote in message
...


Pierre L wrote:

Sounds like you would be a good candidate to have your own shortwave
radio
talk show

I accept PayPal donations!

is the account!

We'll see what happens!



"N8KDV" wrote in message
...
When are we going to wake up and see the menace right on our border to
the north? When are we going to wake up and realise they are not our
friends? When are we going to wake up and realise they harbour those
who
wish us harm?

http://washingtontimes.com/upi-break...2826-6669r.htm

**** CANADA

Do not buy Canadian, do not tour Canada, do not cross Canada to save a
few hours travel time.

BOYCOTT CANADA!