Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks for the endorsement Gregg! I think this unit will be a desk top unit
though. Right now, I have the synthesizer and the loop amplifier/tuning circuit captured into Protel DXP. I still need to do the Rx section and the Sync Detector. A couple days more work.............then the fun stuff begins. Pete "Gregg" wrote in message news:KOCkc.152$m03.103@clgrps13... Pete, KE90A is cookin' something up in his cauldron for you ;-) -- Gregg *It's probably useful, even if it can't be SPICE'd* http://geek.scorpiorising.ca |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Behold, Pete KE9OA signalled from keyed 4-1000A filament:
Thanks for the endorsement Gregg! Anytime :-) I'm pro'lly one of the more excited ones here about your project :-D -- Gregg *It's probably useful, even if it can't be SPICE'd* http://geek.scorpiorising.ca |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Pete KE9OA wrote:
Thanks for the endorsement Gregg! I think this unit will be a desk top unit though. Right now, I have the synthesizer and the loop amplifier/tuning circuit captured into Protel DXP. I still need to do the Rx section and the Sync Detector. A couple days more work.............then the fun stuff begins. Pete Do you get much flak from the bean counters about trimming costs in the design? This seems to be one of the major reasons that some great receivers don't make it to market. -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
No, they are leaving the design details up to me. The owner of the company
is also a MW Dxer like myself. Pete "starman" wrote in message ... Pete KE9OA wrote: Thanks for the endorsement Gregg! I think this unit will be a desk top unit though. Right now, I have the synthesizer and the loop amplifier/tuning circuit captured into Protel DXP. I still need to do the Rx section and the Sync Detector. A couple days more work.............then the fun stuff begins. Pete Do you get much flak from the bean counters about trimming costs in the design? This seems to be one of the major reasons that some great receivers don't make it to market. -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
This is all very exciting Pete.
Wonder if the mechanical on/off switch made it to the final design? Also, are you willing to hazard a guess (realizing of course that other projects could change it) as to an approx. availability date? really looking fwd to it! 73 Russ K3Pi |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "JCJ" wrote in message om... Can anyone give me opionions as to which one is the best true portable PLL synthesized DIGITAL radio receiver for listening to MW(AM)? Please consider the size no bigger than the ATS909 (No S350) In order of importance please consider these: 1.-Sensitivity 2.-Selectivity 3.-Must have a tuning knob 4.-Sound (must have internal speaker) 5.-Memories I think the Super Radios are good choice. Most dedicated SW rigs have attenuation that is present across the AM broadcast band which substantially lowers the sensitivity. -- 73 Brian ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ A lot of radios and 100' of rusty wire! Brian's Radio Universe http://webpages.charter.net/brianehill/ |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Since when did they add PLL to a Super Radio?
"Brian Hill" wrote in message ... "JCJ" wrote in message om... Can anyone give me opionions as to which one is the best true portable PLL synthesized DIGITAL radio receiver for listening to MW(AM)? Please consider the size no bigger than the ATS909 (No S350) In order of importance please consider these: 1.-Sensitivity 2.-Selectivity 3.-Must have a tuning knob 4.-Sound (must have internal speaker) 5.-Memories I think the Super Radios are good choice. Most dedicated SW rigs have attenuation that is present across the AM broadcast band which substantially lowers the sensitivity. -- 73 Brian ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ A lot of radios and 100' of rusty wire! Brian's Radio Universe http://webpages.charter.net/brianehill/ |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 30 Apr 2004 23:50:58 -0700, "CW"
wrote: Since when did they add PLL to a Super Radio? "Brian Hill" wrote in message ... "JCJ" wrote in message om... Can anyone give me opionions as to which one is the best true portable PLL synthesized DIGITAL radio receiver for listening to MW(AM)? Please consider the size no bigger than the ATS909 (No S350) In order of importance please consider these: 1.-Sensitivity 2.-Selectivity 3.-Must have a tuning knob 4.-Sound (must have internal speaker) 5.-Memories I think the Super Radios are good choice. Most dedicated SW rigs have attenuation that is present across the AM broadcast band which substantially lowers the sensitivity. -- 73 Brian ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ A lot of radios and 100' of rusty wire! Brian's Radio Universe http://webpages.charter.net/brianehill/ Yea, he's talking about the new digital Super Radio IV. :-)) |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Bill Everhart" wrote in message Yea, he's talking about the new digital Super Radio IV. :-)) Yea...Right. ![]() |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "CW" wrote in message ... Since when did they add PLL to a Super Radio? Dah! I should have read it better. I was just thinking of a good MW receiver. Sorry CW! -- 73 Brian ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ A lot of radios and 100' of rusty wire! Brian's Radio Universe http://webpages.charter.net/brianehill/ |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|