![]() |
|
Michael 'I'm blind, I cain't read' Bryant wrote: From: N8KDV Michael 'I'm blind, I'm stupid, I lied about a PhD' Bryant wrote: From: N8KDV Even Al, when defending Bush, thought that Bush had assumed that the US was a majority white nation. Here's the quote, again. Read real carefully, Stevie; "There's a lot of people in the world who don't believe that people whose skin color may not be the same as ours can be free and self-govern. I reject that. I reject that strongly. I believe that people who practice the Muslim faith can self-govern. I believe that people whose skins aren't necessarily a different color than white can self-govern." Ours = white. Can you read that well, Steve? Where does he say White Nation oh eyesight challenged one? try again, Steve! Can't back up your fabrication can you Fat Boy? Read, Mr. comprehension-challenged. Ours = white. Not in any dictionary I've ever looked at Fat Boy. |
In article ,
ocom (Michael Bryant) wrote: From: "Mark S. Holden" It's a safe bet that phrase wasn't crafted by a professional writer, but I'd think you'd agree with him. What he said boils down to "those who feel non whites are incapable of governing themselves are wrong." And I think both of us agree with that sentiment despite some of the right-wing anti-Muslim bigotry spewed in this NG. I still think the President is clealy showing that, in his mind, he characterizes the US as a white nation. And you know that there are all kinds of folks in this NG biting their tongues to keep from saying, "Yes, it is!" Have a good day, Mark! The only hate message I have read in this newsgroup is left-wing liberal hatred of Muslims. It is obvious you hate Muslims since you are the only one repeatedly connecting the two. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
In article ,
N8KDV wrote: RHF wrote: = = = ocom (Michael Bryant) wrote in message = = = ... From: "Mark S. Holden" It's a safe bet that phrase wasn't crafted by a professional writer, but I'd think you'd agree with him. What he said boils down to "those who feel non whites are incapable of governing themselves are wrong." And I think both of us agree with that sentiment despite some of the right-wing anti-Muslim bigotry spewed in this NG. I still think the President is clealy showing that, in his mind, he characterizes the US as a white nation. MWB - We need NOT read President Bush's Mind; when we have you very words that proclaim "the US as a white nation." The "White Nation" Mental Defect is Yours MWB - Not President Bush's. MWB - It is Your Sick Mind that is 'inserting' the "Racism" into the simple remarks made by President Bush. Everyone has read your Words and 'now' Clearly Knows You for the Twisted Racist that You are MWB. MWB - You can not Excape Your Own Words. MWB - The Truth is there for Everyone to See - Plain and Simple. MWB - You Stand Convicted by Your Own Words as a Promoter of Race Hatred here in this NewsGroup [.] MWB - The Truth Will Set You Free ~ RHF But will MWB ever free up the truth? I would say Bryant is free of the truth or in other words "truth free." This brings up an idea. Bryant should get on that Democratic radio network of one or two stations and have a show called "The spin zone with Michael Bryant." I mean why not. He is entertaining here. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
Telamon wrote: In article , N8KDV wrote: RHF wrote: = = = ocom (Michael Bryant) wrote in message = = = ... From: "Mark S. Holden" It's a safe bet that phrase wasn't crafted by a professional writer, but I'd think you'd agree with him. What he said boils down to "those who feel non whites are incapable of governing themselves are wrong." And I think both of us agree with that sentiment despite some of the right-wing anti-Muslim bigotry spewed in this NG. I still think the President is clealy showing that, in his mind, he characterizes the US as a white nation. MWB - We need NOT read President Bush's Mind; when we have you very words that proclaim "the US as a white nation." The "White Nation" Mental Defect is Yours MWB - Not President Bush's. MWB - It is Your Sick Mind that is 'inserting' the "Racism" into the simple remarks made by President Bush. Everyone has read your Words and 'now' Clearly Knows You for the Twisted Racist that You are MWB. MWB - You can not Excape Your Own Words. MWB - The Truth is there for Everyone to See - Plain and Simple. MWB - You Stand Convicted by Your Own Words as a Promoter of Race Hatred here in this NewsGroup [.] MWB - The Truth Will Set You Free ~ RHF But will MWB ever free up the truth? I would say Bryant is free of the truth or in other words "truth free." This brings up an idea. Bryant should get on that Democratic radio network of one or two stations and have a show called "The spin zone with Michael Bryant." LOL! That might be the best thing Air America could get going. |
In article 0Bvmc.22192$LA4.15493@edtnps84,
m II wrote: Michael Bryant wrote: Here is a quotation from GWBush this last Friday in the Rose Garden. I'm not sure why it hasn't received more play: "There's a lot of people in the world who don't believe that people whose skin color may not be the same as ours can be free and self-govern. I reject that. I reject that strongly. I believe that people who practice the Muslim faith can self-govern. I believe that people whose skins aren't necessarily a different color than white can self-govern." What does this mean? Yet another Bushism, or is it REALLY what he thinks? =========================================== I believe that people whose skins aren't necessarily a different color than white can self-govern." =========================================== The sentence is the equivalent of a double negative. It means WHITE can self govern! What he SHOULD have said, if he were SANE, was: The President is sane but you are another story. =========================================== I believe that people whose skins aren't necessarily white can self-govern." =========================================== I depends on whether you are Bryant or not. If you are not Bryant you understand the President misspoke. If you are Bryant you think Bush is racist. If you are m II you are an insane Canadian. Hope that clears things up for you. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
Telamon wrote:
If you are not Bryant you understand the President misspoke. Again? He may just start a World War because of this habit. Words are important and if a politician can't use them properly, he shouldn't be in office. Nothing like total nuclear annihilation because of one brain dead stock market swindler. ================================================== == And so, in my State of the - my State of the Union - or state - my speech to the nation, whatever you want to call it, speech to the nation - I asked Americans to give 4,000 years - 4,000 hours over the next - the rest of your life - of service to America. That's what I asked - 4,000 hours. http://quotations.about.com/cs/georg...s_bushisms.htm ================================================== == |
In article ,
N8KDV wrote: Telamon wrote: In article , N8KDV wrote: RHF wrote: = = = ocom (Michael Bryant) wrote in message = = = ... From: "Mark S. Holden" It's a safe bet that phrase wasn't crafted by a professional writer, but I'd think you'd agree with him. What he said boils down to "those who feel non whites are incapable of governing themselves are wrong." And I think both of us agree with that sentiment despite some of the right-wing anti-Muslim bigotry spewed in this NG. I still think the President is clealy showing that, in his mind, he characterizes the US as a white nation. MWB - We need NOT read President Bush's Mind; when we have you very words that proclaim "the US as a white nation." The "White Nation" Mental Defect is Yours MWB - Not President Bush's. MWB - It is Your Sick Mind that is 'inserting' the "Racism" into the simple remarks made by President Bush. Everyone has read your Words and 'now' Clearly Knows You for the Twisted Racist that You are MWB. MWB - You can not Excape Your Own Words. MWB - The Truth is there for Everyone to See - Plain and Simple. MWB - You Stand Convicted by Your Own Words as a Promoter of Race Hatred here in this NewsGroup [.] MWB - The Truth Will Set You Free ~ RHF But will MWB ever free up the truth? I would say Bryant is free of the truth or in other words "truth free." This brings up an idea. Bryant should get on that Democratic radio network of one or two stations and have a show called "The spin zone with Michael Bryant." LOL! That might be the best thing Air America could get going. I'm really serious about it. I would listen. It would be great comedy. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
In article E5Fmc.5275$uN4.3331@clgrps12,
m II wrote: Telamon wrote: If you are not Bryant you understand the President misspoke. Again? He may just start a World War because of this habit. Words are important and if a politician can't use them properly, he shouldn't be in office. Nothing like total nuclear annihilation because of one brain dead stock market swindler. Don't worry. Seconds before the nukes explode he will say just kidding. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
Telamon wrote:
Nothing like total nuclear annihilation because of one brain dead stock market swindler. Don't worry. Seconds before the nukes explode he will say just kidding. Oh. Well...that...that's..ok then... mike |
Michael Bryant wrote:
From: "Mark S. Holden" It's a safe bet that phrase wasn't crafted by a professional writer, but I'd think you'd agree with him. What he said boils down to "those who feel non whites are incapable of governing themselves are wrong." And I think both of us agree with that sentiment despite some of the right-wing anti-Muslim bigotry spewed in this NG. Sorry for the delay in replying, but once a thread turns into a Steve & Mike urination contest, I get selective about which messages I read. Didn't find this until I went back to see if you replied. Racism and religious intolerance aren't left/right issues. They're moral ones. While most Muslims probably are good peace loving people, they don't get nearly as much news coverage as the terrorists. Good news doesn't sell papers or drive up ratings. So most of what we hear about Muslims is related to terrorism. Louis Farrakhan doesn't strike me as a main stream spokesman for Islam either. I still think the President is clealy showing that, in his mind, he characterizes the US as a white nation. I see nothing to indicate President Bush is racist. Look at his cabinet, look at his judicial nominees. An example of liberal racists would be the people who decided to prevent a vote on Estrada in part because he's hispanic. Another would be those who criticize conservative black people because they don't think the way a black person is "supposed" to think. Personally, I think you show prejudice when you equate conservatives with racists or bigots. Interestingly, the Republican I've heard the most buzz about as a possible Presidential candidate for 2008 is Dr. Rice. And you know that there are all kinds of folks in this NG biting their tongues to keep from saying, "Yes, it is!" You may have hit the nail on the head when you said "all kinds" - but not in the way you intended. But I also think they're just a vocal minority, and some of the remarks are puffed up for "entertainment value". Have a good day, Mark! You too. Michael Bryant, WA4009SWL Louisville, KY R75, S800, RX320, SW77, ICF2010K, DX398, 7600G, 6800W, RF2200, 7600A GE SRll, Pro-2006, Pro-2010, Pro-76 (remove "nojunk" to reply) |
|
|
Michael Bryant wrote:
From: "Mark S. Holden" An example of liberal racists would be the people who decided to prevent a vote on Estrada in part because he's hispanic. Mark, this is pretty outlandish. Democrats didn't reject him because he was hispanic. They rejected because of his ultra-conservatism. Voting for him because he was a hispanic would've been racist. In the documents the Democrats inadvertently kept on a public drive, there was mention of concern about letting his nomination get to a vote because he is hispanic. I think Sen. Durbin wrote that one. Personally, I think you show prejudice when you equate conservatives with racists or bigots. Possibly, but I stand by my conclusion that oyu'll find a lot more openly racist bigots on the conservative side than on the liberal side. As a sample, look at this very NG. We'll need to agree to disagree on that one. I really think it's a case of finding what you're looking for. Interestingly, the Republican I've heard the most buzz about as a possible Presidential candidate for 2008 is Dr. Rice. I might vote for her. But I don't think the republicans would ever give her the nomination. Never. I don't know. She's sharp as a tack. She's got a lot of fans in conservative circles. It didn't really help him in the 2000 primaries, but polls on vote.com after Republican debates consistently showed people thought Dr. Keyes was winning the debates. My guess is people who participated in those polls were probably among the more conservative members of the Republican party. But I also think they're just a vocal minority, and some of the remarks are puffed up for "entertainment value". In other words, those openly racist conservatives don't really mean it? Yep. I applaud your telepathic abilities to understand what conservative REALLY mean.... Eh, I think some of the crap gets said primarily to get folks like you riled up. And you tend to presume anyone who disagrees with you is a conservative even if they haven't expressed conservative views. But you're a good guy. I enjoy talking to you. If all conservatives were as nice as you this world would be a much better place. Thanks. Most of the conservatives I run into are nice people. Take it easy, You too. Michael Bryant, WA4009SWL Louisville, KY R75, S800, RX320, SW77, ICF2010K, DX398, 7600G, 6800W, RF2200, 7600A GE SRll, Pro-2006, Pro-2010, Pro-76 (remove "nojunk" to reply) |
"Michael Bryant" wrote in message ... From: N8KDV RHF wrote: MWB - You Stand Convicted by Your Own Words as a Promoter of Race Hatred here in this NewsGroup [.] But will MWB ever free up the truth? Oh yeah, too people known for their respect of the truth, RHF and Lare. Too right-wingers on a mission..... That would be two, not too there professor. |
|
"Michael Bryant" wrote in message ... Mark, this is pretty outlandish. Democrats didn't reject him because he was hispanic. They rejected because of his ultra-conservatism. Voting for him because he was a hispanic would've been racist. So, God forbid, Kerry wins in Nov. and all of his nominations are blocked, do you think the Dems won't be playing the race card? Its one of the things liberals do best. Possibly, but I stand by my conclusion that oyu'll find a lot more openly racist bigots on the conservative side than on the liberal side. As a sample, look at this very NG. A few NG posters hardley makes a sample. Again your conclusion is drawn from very little factual evidence. In other words, those openly racist conservatives don't really mean it? Yep. I applaud your telepathic abilities to understand what conservative REALLY mean.... But you have all the answers right? So what do you use, tarot cards, crystal ball, Dear Abby? But you're a good guy. I enjoy talking to you. If all conservatives were as nice as you this world would be a much better place. And if all liberals were NOT like you, this world would be a much better place. |
|
|
"Michael Bryant" wrote in message ... So, just on a common-sense basis, do you really believe most Klansman are more likely to be liberals than conservatives? If so, I'd like to see the FACTS you base that on! I'd guess most Klansmen, the few that are left, are anti-government, whether its liberals or conservatives. God help me, but I base it on what they actually say. If conservatives in here use racist rhetoric, I think it's a reasonable inference to conclude that they are exactly what their words paint them to be. Do you have a different scoring system? So you're saying all the conservatives in here are racist? Well, whether liberal or conservative, I think the world would be a nicer place if we had fewer folks, like you and Steve, that think it's so cool to be an aggressive asshole when you're hiding behind a monitor. And your just so nice and reserved right? You're the Ahole here, ask anyone. I'd wish you a nice day, but none of us even know your name. Hardly worth responding to. The name is Mike, have a good one. |
Michael 'I never did get my PhD!' Bryant wrote: From: N8KDV RHF wrote: MWB - You Stand Convicted by Your Own Words as a Promoter of Race Hatred here in this NewsGroup [.] But will MWB ever free up the truth? Oh yeah, too people known for their respect of the truth, RHF and Lare. Too right-wingers on a mission..... You should have used the word 'two' instead of too. |
Michael Bryant wrote: From: "Mark S. Holden" An example of liberal racists would be the people who decided to prevent a vote on Estrada in part because he's hispanic. Mark, this is pretty outlandish. Democrats didn't reject him because he was hispanic. They rejected because of his ultra-conservatism. Voting for him because he was a hispanic would've been racist. Personally, I think you show prejudice when you equate conservatives with racists or bigots. Possibly, but I stand by my conclusion that oyu'll find a lot more openly racist bigots on the conservative side than on the liberal side. As a sample, look at this very NG. 'oyu'll'? |
Michael 'I can't help but fabricate!' Bryant wrote: From: "MnMikew" Too right-wingers on a mission..... That would be two, not too there professor. I stand corrected. I guess I was fixating on the number of times Lare has used the word "to" wnen it should've been "too" over the past two days. You should be fixating on why you were not able to get that PhD you lied about! |
|
"Michael Bryant" wrote in message ... From: "MnMikew" But, you've told me that "big government" is the mark of being liberal, right? Using deductive logic, doesn't that mean that anti-government Klansmen are far more likely to be conservatives. Yes, it does. It really does. See the advantage of being able to use logic? No, you're confusing anti-big-government and anti-government, two completly seperate things. And I don't believe I'm the one who said "big government is the mark of being a liberal" So you're saying all the conservatives in here are racist? Not all. Many. Some, are very open and nice people that don't want to face the true scope of their ideology's umbrella. And your just so nice and reserved right? You're the Ahole here, ask anyone. Oh, come on. You were the first one to start screaming obscenities and making one-line insults. The first? Highly doubtful. You've been here longer than I. |
|
"Michael Bryant" wrote in message ... remember seeing from you. I thought the name you use was a play on my own name. Huh? I've been using this name for years. Though the spambot part has changed a few times. I get very little spam, well, for an aol account anyway. |
"MnMikew" wrote in message ... "Michael Bryant" wrote in message ... remember seeing from you. I thought the name you use was a play on my own name. Huh? I've been using this name for years. Though the spambot part has changed a few times. I get very little spam, well, for an aol account anyway. Well, Im off to the cabin for a few days, you and Steve play nice. Gonna see what I can bring in with the DX402, though I usually cant get much where I am. Got a dipole to hang in the trees this summer, that should help. |
Michael 'I should seek professional help' Bryant wrote: From: "MnMikew" Oh, come on. You were the first one to start screaming obscenities and making one-line insults. The first? Highly doubtful. You've been here longer than I. I really do have a policy of not using obscenities and insults on people until they show me that they can't communicate any other way. As I remember you were ridiculing me being stupid in the first very posts I remember seeing from you. I thought the name you use was a play on my own name. I never saw him use the name 'Fat Boy'. |
Michael 'I'm a 'educated' retard' Bryant wrote: As I remember you were ridiculing me being stupid in the first very posts I remember seeing from you. He caught on quick! You are stupid, no matter how many degrees you might have! |
MWB - You are to, Too. TWO ! Funny :o) ~ RHF
.. .. = = = ocom (Michael Bryant) wrote in message = = = ... From: "MnMikew" Too right-wingers on a mission..... That would be two, not too there professor. I stand corrected. I guess I was fixating on the number of times Lare has used the word "to" wnen it should've been "too" over the past two days. Michael Bryant, WA4009SWL Louisville, KY R75, S800, RX320, SW77, ICF2010K, DX398, 7600G, 6800W, RF2200, 7600A GE SRll, Pro-2006, Pro-2010, Pro-76 (remove "nojunk" to reply) |
= = = ocom (Michael Bryant) wrote in message
= = = ... From: "Mark S. Holden" An example of liberal racists would be the people who decided to prevent a vote on Estrada in part because he's hispanic. Mark, this is pretty outlandish. Democrats didn't reject him because he was hispanic. They rejected because of his ultra-conservatism. Voting for him because he was a hispanic would've been racist. MWB - YES Its Is Rascist [.] To the Democrats Estrada is NOT the Right Type (Stereo-Type) of Hispanic. He is a non-democrat and does not subscribe to the poor minority that needs the Liberal Democrat White Leaders to Help Him become someone. When it comes to 'minorities' he Democrats have each Group Categorized into the Right Kind of People (Our People) and those who just don't know their place. This clearly places the Democrats as the most Bigoted and Biased Political party of the two major parties in the USofA. When a Democrat Leader says the name of Supreme Court Justice "Clarence Thomas" . . . the make it sound like the "N" Word [.] http://www.oyez.org/oyez/resource/le.../106/biography ssi ~ RHF .. .. Personally, I think you show prejudice when you equate conservatives with racists or bigots. Possibly, but I stand by my conclusion that oyu'll find a lot more openly racist bigots on the conservative side than on the liberal side. As a sample, look at this very NG. Interestingly, the Republican I've heard the most buzz about as a possible Presidential candidate for 2008 is Dr. Rice. I might vote for her. But I don't think the republicans would ever give her the nomination. Never. But I also think they're just a vocal minority, and some of the remarks are puffed up for "entertainment value". In other words, those openly racist conservatives don't really mean it? Yep. I applaud your telepathic abilities to understand what conservative REALLY mean.... But you're a good guy. I enjoy talking to you. If all conservatives were as nice as you this world would be a much better place. Take it easy, Michael Bryant, WA4009SWL Louisville, KY R75, S800, RX320, SW77, ICF2010K, DX398, 7600G, 6800W, RF2200, 7600A GE SRll, Pro-2006, Pro-2010, Pro-76 (remove "nojunk" to reply) |
MWB,
"Possibly, but I stand by my conclusion that you'll find a lot more openly racist bigots on the conservative side than on the liberal side. As a sample, look at this very NG." MWB - Think About Your Words ! What you have said is the the 'evil' "Conservatives" are Open and Honest about their True Views. .. . . and Correspondingly that the 'good' "Liberals" Hide and are Dis-Honest about their True Views. [ Liberal LIES and Leftist DISTORTIONS ] Conservative or Liberal: Let Me have a Dialog with and Deal with the Open and Honest Man .. . . at Least I Know Who I Am Doing Business With [.] MWB - You Want The Truth - You Can't Handle the Truth ~ RHF .. .. = = = ocom (Michael Bryant) wrote in message = = = ... From: "Mark S. Holden" An example of liberal racists would be the people who decided to prevent a vote on Estrada in part because he's hispanic. Mark, this is pretty outlandish. Democrats didn't reject him because he was hispanic. They rejected because of his ultra-conservatism. Voting for him because he was a hispanic would've been racist. Personally, I think you show prejudice when you equate conservatives with racists or bigots. Possibly, but I stand by my conclusion that oyu'll find a lot more openly racist bigots on the conservative side than on the liberal side. As a sample, look at this very NG. Interestingly, the Republican I've heard the most buzz about as a possible Presidential candidate for 2008 is Dr. Rice. I might vote for her. But I don't think the republicans would ever give her the nomination. Never. But I also think they're just a vocal minority, and some of the remarks are puffed up for "entertainment value". In other words, those openly racist conservatives don't really mean it? Yep. I applaud your telepathic abilities to understand what conservative REALLY mean.... But you're a good guy. I enjoy talking to you. If all conservatives were as nice as you this world would be a much better place. Take it easy, Michael Bryant, WA4009SWL Louisville, KY R75, S800, RX320, SW77, ICF2010K, DX398, 7600G, 6800W, RF2200, 7600A GE SRll, Pro-2006, Pro-2010, Pro-76 (remove "nojunk" to reply) .. |
NYK,
Where You see a Cesspool - I See A Rainbow of Colors ! The Facts are that Native Americans, Europeans, Africans, Asians and others have all been part of the USofA since before its beginning. This Nation has been and still is a Rainbow of Colors. .. . . and just like a Rainbow. Everytime you look at the Rainbow, the Colors Change. That is the Beauty of the Rainbow and the Strength of th USofA. That is a very 'real' Fact ~ RHF .. .. = = = lex (Nobody You Know) wrote in message = = = ... wrote: Bush Sees the US as a White Nation Unfortunately, he's wrong. It is no longer a White nation. I wish it was. It used to be. Now it's a multi-racial cesspool headed for the trash heap of history. Your RACE is your nation. ------------------------------------------------------------ Nations are like leaves; they change color before they fall. ------------------------------------------------------------ |
In article ,
ocom (Michael Bryant) wrote: From: "Mark S. Holden" An example of liberal racists would be the people who decided to prevent a vote on Estrada in part because he's hispanic. Mark, this is pretty outlandish. Democrats didn't reject him because he was hispanic. They rejected because of his ultra-conservatism. Voting for him because he was a hispanic would've been racist. It was a clear case of Democrat rich white elitist racial hatred. They also said a lot of nasty things about Estrada. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
In article ,
ocom (Michael Bryant) wrote: From: "MnMikew" I stand by my conclusion that oyu'll find a lot more openly racist bigots on the conservative side than on the liberal side. As a sample, look at this very NG. A few NG posters hardley makes a sample. Again your conclusion is drawn from very little factual evidence. So, just on a common-sense basis, do you really believe most Klansman are more likely to be liberals than conservatives? If so, I'd like to see the FACTS you base that on! Some well know Democrat congress people like Bird are ex Klansmen. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
In article ,
ocom (Michael Bryant) wrote: From: "MnMikew" Oh, come on. You were the first one to start screaming obscenities and making one-line insults. The first? Highly doubtful. You've been here longer than I. I really do have a policy of not using obscenities and insults on people until they show me that they can't communicate any other way. As I remember you were ridiculing me being stupid in the first very posts I remember seeing from you. I thought the name you use was a play on my own name. I'll try my best to be nice to you, if that is how you would rather conduct this discourse. I would rather avoid an insult-fest. Well you are the expert on that. You start most of the "insult-fests." -- Telamon Ventura, California |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:52 AM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com