In article YUCmc.5240$uN4.598@clgrps12, says...

N8KDV wrote:

I think most folks would be satisfied with a hot poker up Frank White's
ass.

Hitting the sauce again, eh Steve?

I have doubts as to his sanity.

And no doubts at all as to his vulgarity, venom, vituperativeness, and
lack of veracity.

It is best to ignore him completely and allow him to waste his life in
impotent babble.

FW

Frank 'I'm confused today' White wrote:

In article YUCmc.5240$uN4.598@clgrps12, says...

N8KDV wrote:

I think most folks would be satisfied with a hot poker up Frank White's
ass.

Hitting the sauce again, eh Steve?

I have doubts as to his sanity.

Well we all know yours took a hike a long time ago!

Frank White wrote:


And no doubts at all as to his vulgarity, venom, vituperativeness, and
lack of veracity.

Able alliteration ascribes all attributes...


mike

From: (Frank White)

N8KDV wrote:

I think most folks would be satisfied with a hot poker up Frank White's
ass.

Hitting the sauce again, eh Steve?

I have doubts as to his sanity.

And no doubts at all as to his vulgarity, venom, vituperativeness, and
lack of veracity.

It is best to ignore him completely and allow him to waste his life in
impotent babble.


Here, here!

Elegantly eloquent.




Michael Bryant, WA4009SWL
Louisville, KY
R75, S800, RX320, SW77, ICF2010K,
DX398, 7600G, 6800W, RF2200, 7600A
GE SRll, Pro-2006, Pro-2010, Pro-76
(remove "nojunk" to reply)

From: N8KDV

Hitting the sauce again, eh Steve?

I have doubts as to his sanity.

Well we all know yours took a hike a long time ago!


Predictable Lare response. He must've been the Man in the 3rd grade.


Michael Bryant, WA4009SWL
Louisville, KY
R75, S800, RX320, SW77, ICF2010K,
DX398, 7600G, 6800W, RF2200, 7600A
GE SRll, Pro-2006, Pro-2010, Pro-76
(remove "nojunk" to reply)

"-=jd=-" wrote in message
...

I don't go for those "sissy" sports - I'm a fly-fisherman...

BWHAHAHAH. Yeah, those six inch trout can do some damage.

Michael 'Things just never go right cause I'm a retard!' Bryant wrote:

From: N8KDV

Hitting the sauce again, eh Steve?

I have doubts as to his sanity.

Well we all know yours took a hike a long time ago!


Predictable Lare response. He must've been the Man in the 3rd grade.

You must have been the Man who didn't finish his PhD!

On Thu, 6 May 2004 21:01:23 -0500, Frank White wrote
(in article ):

In article ,
says...

On Thu 06 May 2004 05:41:23p, N8KDV wrote in
message
:



WA4009SWL wrote:

From Drudge:

http://apnews.myway.com/article/20040506/D82D86T80.html

Are you happy now Fat Boy?


Aren't you the optimistic one!

The Liberal View will apparently not be satisfied with anything less
than
Bush's head on a pike.

Actually, I think they'd be satisfied with RUMSFELD'S head
on a pike...

FW


I want Rumsfeld /and/ Cheney's.

For starters.

Did anyone else notice that "military" and "Army" and all sorts
of people were mentioned over and over and over.

Now, I missed the first 3 or 4 minutes of Rumsfeld's comments so
maybe he said "and contractors".

Did he?

If not, why not? Contractors have been accused just as well as
GI's.

Why don't we start with the resignation - forced resignation, if
necessary - of any high-level executives in the United States
government who - present or past - had any close associations
with the main contractor involved in the allegations being made.

That is, of course, Halliburton.

The stench of the apparent corruption made me sick (not a joke -
I felt like throwing up).

And I - like many, many others saw this coming; it was obvious,
boys and girls.

Remember when the President and Commander-in-Chief start making
sweeping statements about who was - and, more importantly, was
NOT - subject to the Geneva Convention as PW's (Prisoners of
War)?


It's going to be "interesting" to see if charges of "war crimes"
and "crimes against humanity" are going to be brought.

And, if so, against whom.



Gray Shockley
--------------------------------------------------------
33T4M, Military Intelligence, ELINT
United States Army (retired)

In article ,
ocom says...

From: (Frank White)

N8KDV wrote:

I think most folks would be satisfied with a hot poker up Frank
White's
ass.

Hitting the sauce again, eh Steve?

I have doubts as to his sanity.

And no doubts at all as to his vulgarity, venom, vituperativeness, and
lack of veracity.

It is best to ignore him completely and allow him to waste his life in
impotent babble.


Here, here!

Elegantly eloquent.

(bow) Thank you.

What's interesting is, when I post that I'm ignoring him, it
apparently provokes him to attack me. Which I don't see because
I'm not opening his posts. Which, once he realizes that, makes
him angrier still and he attacks me again. Which I *still*
don't see. Which keeps the cycle going until he gets tired of
it.

It's sad, really...

FW

On Fri, 7 May 2004 17:58:36 -0500, jd=- wrote
(in article ) :

On Fri 07 May 2004 03:24:47p, Gray Shockley
wrote in message :

On Thu, 6 May 2004 21:01:23 -0500, Frank White wrote
(in article ):

In article ,
says...

{snippage}

The Liberal View will apparently not be satisfied with anything less
than Bush's head on a pike.

Actually, I think they'd be satisfied with RUMSFELD'S head
on a pike...

FW


I want Rumsfeld /and/ Cheney's.

For starters.

Did anyone else notice that "military" and "Army" and all sorts
of people were mentioned over and over and over.

Now, I missed the first 3 or 4 minutes of Rumsfeld's comments so
maybe he said "and contractors".

Did he?

If not, why not? Contractors have been accused just as well as
GI's.

Why don't we start with the resignation - forced resignation, if
necessary - of any high-level executives in the United States
government who - present or past - had any close associations
with the main contractor involved in the allegations being made.

That is, of course, Halliburton.

The stench of the apparent corruption made me sick (not a joke -
I felt like throwing up).

And I - like many, many others saw this coming; it was obvious,
boys and girls.

Remember when the President and Commander-in-Chief start making
sweeping statements about who was - and, more importantly, was
NOT - subject to the Geneva Convention as PW's (Prisoners of
War)?


It's going to be "interesting" to see if charges of "war crimes"
and "crimes against humanity" are going to be brought.

And, if so, against whom.

Gray Shockley
--------------------------------------------------------
33T4M, Military Intelligence, ELINT
United States Army (retired)


What surprised me the most was the lack of the inquisitors to register any
sustainable fault with the corrective actions taken so far. It would
appear the only sustainable beef the committe had was that they were not
informed in a timely manner. The corrective actions already taken and
under way seem to be more than adequate and the committee members seemed a
bit frustrated that there was nothing they could complain about - other
than they weren't in the loop. Almost as if they were ****ed that they
didn't have the opportunity to sternly and with full righteous indignation
towards the Generals, order them to do what they were already doing.

One got the impression they felt cheated out of a few satisfying
"Harrumphs!"

-=jd=-


My overall response was: "Uh, guys; these people aren't professionals".


Bush and crew really appear to need adult leadership very, very badly.

I think I was residing in a lovely city in the Central Highlands the last
time I heard this musical question: "Would you buy a used war from this man".

That time it was President Nixon.



Gray Shockley
-------------------------------------------
For every complex problem there is an answer
that is clear, simple, and wrong. - H. L. Mencken