On Thu, 6 May 2004 21:01:23 -0500, Frank White wrote
(in article ):

In article ,
says...

On Thu 06 May 2004 05:41:23p, N8KDV wrote in
message
:



WA4009SWL wrote:

From Drudge:

http://apnews.myway.com/article/20040506/D82D86T80.html

Are you happy now Fat Boy?


Aren't you the optimistic one!

The Liberal View will apparently not be satisfied with anything less
than
Bush's head on a pike.

Actually, I think they'd be satisfied with RUMSFELD'S head
on a pike...

FW


I want Rumsfeld /and/ Cheney's.

For starters.

Did anyone else notice that "military" and "Army" and all sorts
of people were mentioned over and over and over.

Now, I missed the first 3 or 4 minutes of Rumsfeld's comments so
maybe he said "and contractors".

Did he?

If not, why not? Contractors have been accused just as well as
GI's.

Why don't we start with the resignation - forced resignation, if
necessary - of any high-level executives in the United States
government who - present or past - had any close associations
with the main contractor involved in the allegations being made.

That is, of course, Halliburton.

The stench of the apparent corruption made me sick (not a joke -
I felt like throwing up).

And I - like many, many others saw this coming; it was obvious,
boys and girls.

Remember when the President and Commander-in-Chief start making
sweeping statements about who was - and, more importantly, was
NOT - subject to the Geneva Convention as PW's (Prisoners of
War)?


It's going to be "interesting" to see if charges of "war crimes"
and "crimes against humanity" are going to be brought.

And, if so, against whom.



Gray Shockley
--------------------------------------------------------
33T4M, Military Intelligence, ELINT
United States Army (retired)