ocom (Michael Bryant) wrote ...

Hey LW,

What radio did you keep for the frigerator box?


Good point, Professor. Actually down to 2 keepers. The rusty-trusty
R4c and the Frog-A-Hunnert.

Might pick up an InRad 1.8 for the 4c at Dayton.

Nahh .. don't need anything that narrow to hear profit Stair.

= = = (LW) wrote in message
= = = . com...
Tracy Fort wrote ...

Sorry if it offends the rest of the world! I support the 1st
ammendment, but not near as much as I support the 2nd.

Good point - if they took away the 2nd,
there probably wouldn't be a first, anyway.


TLF,

More people will Listen to a Man with a "Gun in his Hands"
then a Man with 'empty hands'.

Many people will Listen to a Man with a "Cash in his Hands"
then a Man with 'empty hands'.

The Rich and Powerful Man can Buy the Men with the Guns.

Therefore the Average Citizen needs a Gun to give him Equal
Standing with the Rich and Powerful. For when a group of
Average Citizens come together in Common Defense; they are
more powerful then all the Rich and Powerful and their Hired
Guns. Here in lies the strength and purpose of the Second
Amendment; to 'balance' "the Will of the People" against
the forces of the Rich and Powerful (those who would
control them).

Americans Arm Yourself and Speak-Out for Yourself ~ RHF

..

On Mon, 10 May 2004 13:55:06 +0000 (UTC), (Mike
Andrews) wrote:

It would be a Really Good Thing if people would keep their postings
to topics consistent with the name of this newsgroup:

REC.RADIO.SHORTWAVE


You ain't got a clue! Now go look in the mirror, I think your tin foil
hat is just a wee bit askew.

(RHF) wrote ...


The Rich and Powerful Man can Buy the Men with the Guns.


So sad but so true.

Jacob and Esau cut a deal over a bowl of soup.

We can be bought for less in too many cases.

LW wrote:
(RHF) wrote ...


The Rich and Powerful Man can Buy the Men with the Guns.



So sad but so true.

Jacob and Esau cut a deal over a bowl of soup.

We can be bought for less in too many cases.

Soup? Nope.

If memory serves, it was Esau selling his birthright to Jacob for a bowl
of porridge.

In today's world it may well be re-phrased as:

USA Selling it's Birthright to Halliburton for a Bowl of Oil

==================================
Porridge seems to play an important part in literature. Note how, many
centuries later, a certain 'Goldielocks' did a break and enter to steal
this stuff from three innocent bears, who had gone out to commune with
nature. Then 'she' trashed their sleeping quarters...


mike

m II wrote:

LW wrote:
(RHF) wrote ...


The Rich and Powerful Man can Buy the Men with the Guns.



So sad but so true.

Jacob and Esau cut a deal over a bowl of soup.

We can be bought for less in too many cases.

Soup? Nope.

If memory serves, it was Esau selling his birthright to Jacob for a bowl
of porridge.

In today's world it may well be re-phrased as:

USA Selling it's Birthright to Halliburton for a Bowl of Oil

Where oh where do you come up with this ****?

"m II" wrote in message
news:inQnc.21122$F04.2950@clgrps13...
LW wrote:
(RHF) wrote ...


The Rich and Powerful Man can Buy the Men with the Guns.



So sad but so true.

Jacob and Esau cut a deal over a bowl of soup.

We can be bought for less in too many cases.

Soup? Nope.

If memory serves, it was Esau selling his birthright to Jacob for a
bowl
of porridge.

In today's world it may well be re-phrased as:

USA Selling it's Birthright to Halliburton for a Bowl of Oil


That's a good analogy considering the tortured logic engaged in by
those who believe either fable.

N8KDV wrote:

Jacob and Esau cut a deal over a bowl of soup.

We can be bought for less in too many cases.

Soup? Nope.

If memory serves, it was Esau selling his birthright to Jacob for a bowl
of porridge.

In today's world it may well be re-phrased as:

USA Selling it's Birthright to Halliburton for a Bowl of Oil


Where oh where do you come up with this ****?

Good question. Let's see...

a) bowl of soup didn't sound right. I remembered 'porridge'
b) The previous poster noted that somtimes people can be bought too cheaply.
c) The original biblical phrase came to mind.
d) I typed in the phrase.
e) I noticed Esau was potentially a very badly misspelled USA.
f) Instantly, I had a vision of EVIL, in all it's swirling, sulphurous,
Ashcroftian, demonic horror. I was mesmerized by the stench of unrefined
oil.
g) After that, the trembling slowly subsided. I wiped the fear induced
perspiration from my brow, changed my soiled underwear and then, the
rest of the composition fell naturally into place.
h) I pressed the 'Send' button just before the jack booted Cheneyians
kicked my door in.

It's a good thing I have all those seventies vintage boat anchor
receivers piled all over the place. The bumbling robos tipped one over
and were subdued by the weight. I will wait for the elections in
November to be over before releasing my unwilling and prostrate house
guests. By that trime they will have forgotten why they're here.

They claim they can take the discomfort, but all the cats in heat here
keep vigorously backing into their mustachioed dogfaces. Being a poor
country limits our ability to abuse the helpless. With a larger GNP, I'd
be able to use MUCH larger mammals in heat.


That should be a suffient outline, but I can't guarantee one hundred
percent completeness.



mike

T. Early wrote:

In today's world it may well be re-phrased as:

USA Selling it's Birthright to Halliburton for a Bowl of Oil



That's a good analogy considering the tortured logic engaged in by
those who believe either fable.

In a convoluted, winding, anfractuous, flexuous, meandering, meandrous,
serpentine, sinuous, snaky way I feel you may be close to the truth.

mike (using a THEOsauraus)© II




©Densa International
Think Tanks Cleaned Cheap

In article ,
ocom (Michael Bryant) wrote:

From: Bill Everhart


On Mon, 10 May 2004 03:15:49 GMT, Telamon
wrote:


You continue to wear the king of Trolls crown.

I'm Pro "Old" Europe. They get more vacation days then we do.


Please, Bill, don't re-quote Telamon's one-line posts. They are just too
analytically overwhelming....

Since I generally write in a straightforward fashion, it should not take
much effort to understand what I write. You on the other hand have such
a tortuous thought process necessitated by constant stream of lies and
fabrications that a team of psychiatrists could not decipher your
missives.

However, I can understand that a person with your educational background
and intelligence might have a bit of difficulty.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California