| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#4
May 11th 04, 04:32 AM
|
|||
|
|||
"Michael Bryant" wrote in message ... From: "T. Early" You toss the word "neocon" about like a frisbee. Would you mind saying what/who you think it refers to? I'm always wondering who's in that box and who isn't as far as you're concerned. For most conservatives, it has a very definite meaning. You're one. Not really conservative, but willing to support anyone that gives you a chance to strike back at your even less precisely-defined notion of a liberal/leftist. In short, you're not going to answer my question but are going to defer the answer by striking back with your own less precisely-defined notion of a neo-conservative. Here's a pretty good line (told to me by a Jewish friend BTW) that may help: "con" is short for conservative, and "neo" is short for Jewish. Not exact, but true in a lot of instances since the original neo-conservatives were largely Jewish former liberals who jumped ship when the excesses at that end of the spectrum became too much to bear. But eschewing your diversionary question, what do you think of Bush's stand on the digusting depravity he's seen in the photos? I realize that I'm feeding a straight line here, but isn't his stand on this a no-brainer? But my opinion may not count since you'd have a hard time finding me rationalizing true torture. I stick to questioning your fast and loose definition of what constitutes torture. |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Here is My Resume. Who Am I? | General | |||
| Here is My Resume. Who Am I? | Scanner | |||
| Here is My Resume. Who Am I? | Shortwave | |||
Threaded Mode
