Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old May 11th 04, 03:51 AM
Michael Bryant
 
Posts: n/a
Default Bush Totally Disgusted

How come all you neocons that are so busy rationalizing a moral base for
torture are ignoring the words of your own leader? Aren't you listening to your
own leader?

http://apnews.myway.com/article/20040511/D82G3FK00.html


Michael Bryant, WA4009SWL
Louisville, KY
R75, S800, RX320, SW77, ICF2010K,
DX398, 7600G, 6800W, RF2200, 7600A
GE SRll, Pro-2006, Pro-2010, Pro-76
(remove "nojunk" to reply)
  #2   Report Post  
Old May 11th 04, 03:56 AM
T. Early
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Michael Bryant" wrote in message
...
How come all you neocons that are so busy rationalizing a moral base

for
torture are ignoring the words of your own leader? Aren't you

listening to your
own leader?

http://apnews.myway.com/article/20040511/D82G3FK00.html


You toss the word "neocon" about like a frisbee. Would you mind
saying what/who you think it refers to? I'm always wondering who's in
that box and who isn't as far as you're concerned. For most
conservatives, it has a very definite meaning.


  #5   Report Post  
Old May 11th 04, 04:49 AM
Michael Bryant
 
Posts: n/a
Default

From: "T. Early"

In short, you're not going to answer my question but are going to
defer the answer by striking back with your own less precisely-defined
notion of a neo-conservative.


No, I'm pointing out that your constant use of the term "liberal" is even less
preceisely-defined. Why do you neo-cons always invent or create words when you
can't defend your original concepts?

Here's a pretty good line (told to me by a Jewish friend BTW) that may
help: "con" is short for conservative, and "neo" is short for Jewish.


Duh. Neo is a prefix meaning "near." Has zip, nada, zillch to do with Jews.
More invention for dramatic license? You can really spin those homilies....

But eschewing your diversionary question, what do you think of

Bush's stand on
the digusting depravity he's seen in the photos?


I realize that I'm feeding a straight line here, but isn't his stand
on this a no-brainer? But my opinion may not count since you'd have
a hard time finding me rationalizing true torture. I stick to
questioning your fast and loose definition of what constitutes
torture.


So your argument boils down to "It's not torture"?

Geez, whatever you want to call it, how do you feel about this quote from
Bush's press secretary:

"The president's reaction was one of deep disgust and disbelief that anyone who
wears our uniform would engage in such shameful and appalling acts," White
House spokesman Scott McClellan said. "It does not represent our United States
military and it does not represent the United States of America."

Why are you neocons so out of sync with your own leader? Do you think he's just
sucking up to the Arabs and the liberal press? What does that say about his
"integrity"?

Good luck figuring it out.



Michael Bryant, WA4009SWL
Louisville, KY
R75, S800, RX320, SW77, ICF2010K,
DX398, 7600G, 6800W, RF2200, 7600A
GE SRll, Pro-2006, Pro-2010, Pro-76
(remove "nojunk" to reply)


  #6   Report Post  
Old May 11th 04, 05:45 AM
T. Early
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Michael Bryant" wrote in message
...
From: "T. Early"


In short, you're not going to answer my question but are going to
defer the answer by striking back with your own less

precisely-defined
notion of a neo-conservative.


No, I'm pointing out that your constant use of the term "liberal" is

even less
preceisely-defined. Why do you neo-cons always invent or create

words when you
can't defend your original concepts?


Do me a favor here MB, and I'm going to follow up on it. Google T.
Early as author in rec.radio. shortwave, and search for the term
liberal. See how many times I've used the term (not how many times
posts that I've replied to have used it), and then let's discuss
"constant use." Maybe then we can discuss your consistent
misstatements here (such as that whopper). BTW, I acknowledge calling
Al Franken a liberal and referring to NPR, the Washington Post, and NY
Times as liberal--- over the course of -lots- of posts. Mea Culpa on
those controversial statements.


Here's a pretty good line (told to me by a Jewish friend BTW) that

may
help: "con" is short for conservative, and "neo" is short for

Jewish.

Duh. Neo is a prefix meaning "near." Has zip, nada, zillch to do

with Jews.
More invention for dramatic license? You can really spin those

homilies....


It's a Joke!!!!! Doh!

BTW, "neo" as a prefix means "new." Most of these folks were liberals
in the 70s and early 80s. You might want to reassess your view on the
"neo-con" concept.

But eschewing your diversionary question, what do you think of

Bush's stand on
the digusting depravity he's seen in the photos?


I realize that I'm feeding a straight line here, but isn't his

stand
on this a no-brainer? But my opinion may not count since you'd

have
a hard time finding me rationalizing true torture. I stick to
questioning your fast and loose definition of what constitutes
torture.


So your argument boils down to "It's not torture"?


No, my "argument" on this issue has pretty consistently been that the
use of the word "torture" in this newsgroup (mostly, I think, by you)
is designed to be politically inflammatory and is directly at odds
with most reputable coverage of the situation-- which consistently
uses terms like "abuse" as opposed to "torture," even where the
sources are not that administration-friendly. From what I have read
recently, there is stuff on the way that comes a lot closer to what I
would consider torture.

Geez, whatever you want to call it, how do you feel about this quote

from
Bush's press secretary:

"The president's reaction was one of deep disgust and disbelief that

anyone who
wears our uniform would engage in such shameful and appalling acts,"

White
House spokesman Scott McClellan said. "It does not represent our

United States
military and it does not represent the United States of America."

Why are you neocons so out of sync with your own leader? Do you

think he's just
sucking up to the Arabs and the liberal press? What does that say

about his
"integrity"?

Good luck figuring it out.


I do have it figured out; it's a highly appropriate statement. You
also appear to have me confused with someone else. I continue to
wonder how someone who does not know what a "neo-con" -is- can
classify anyone -as- one.




  #7   Report Post  
Old May 11th 04, 06:13 PM
MnMikew
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"T. Early" wrote in message
...
In short, you're not going to answer my question but are going to
defer the answer by striking back with your own less precisely-defined
notion of a neo-conservative.

SOP for Bryant. When confronted with a question he can't or dosen't want to
answer, he iqnores you.


  #9   Report Post  
Old May 11th 04, 04:07 AM
Stinger
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"T. Early" wrote in message
...

"Michael Bryant" wrote in message
...
How come all you neocons that are so busy rationalizing a moral base

for
torture are ignoring the words of your own leader? Aren't you

listening to your
own leader?

http://apnews.myway.com/article/20040511/D82G3FK00.html


You toss the word "neocon" about like a frisbee. Would you mind
saying what/who you think it refers to? I'm always wondering who's in
that box and who isn't as far as you're concerned. For most
conservatives, it has a very definite meaning.


I expressed the same sentiment yesterday, as well.

Besides, MWB's original post was pure troll.

-- Stinger


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Here is My Resume. Who Am I? Roger Gt General 10 December 17th 03 08:50 PM
Here is My Resume. Who Am I? private Scanner 10 December 17th 03 08:50 PM
Here is My Resume. Who Am I? RHF Shortwave 9 December 17th 03 08:50 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:28 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017