Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
m II wrote:
http://www.breakfornews.com/NickBergEnemiesList.htm Discrepencies in the videos. Taken at two different times. http://leocaesius.blogspot.com/ |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "m II" wrote in message news:h6Eoc.4638$RM.2389@edtnps89... http://www.breakfornews.com/NickBergEnemiesList.htm Is this, like what, the 100th time you've misrepresented what's in a link? Where oh where does this "piece" say that *Berg* was on any list? I mean, you're already the master of links from the most loony, absurd "sources" as it is--you shouldn't have to lie about what they say. Like "FreeRepublic.com" is going to influence Muslim terrorists! LMAO. Shouldn't these idiots be demonstrating in front of the World Bank or something? |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
T. Early wrote:
Now, if it's a FAMILY operation, don't you think the arch villain pro war types would tend to lump ALL it's members with the same brush? Actually, no. Thre bottom line is this, despite yet another tortuous attempt to disguise and overstatement/incacuracy: 1) you say in basic black and white that Berg was on "enemies list" (forgetting for the moment how obscure that "list" is); 2) in actuality, Berg himself is not on any "list," as the article clearly illustrates; 3) you backtrack, conceding that....well it's really the "family firm". In the future, please at least try to design your headers for truth as opposed to maximim shock value. The latter is too easy to debunk. Maximum shock value is the only reason I got into this racket. I'm still trying to recover my sense of self esteem for having been fired from the 'National Enquirer' due to 'exagerated' articles. "No one will believe this crap" said the Editor as I handed over my 'The President is a HUMAN BEING' article to him. Where did the 'Enemies List' say "This company is against us, but the kid is OK" ?? Doesn't this idea of lunatic fringe 'lists' of people expressing an opinion remind you of the 'fellow travellers' smears of the McCarthy era witch hunts? Even bloody CHURCH groups are enemies of the State on this list! Very totalitarian... No it doesn't remind me of that because nobody--except apparently some bizarre website--gives a **** about what they say. And if they are in fact lunatic fringe, they are certainly no more so than numerous places I've been directed to by following links posted by you. No more so? That's a good start. Thank you. missed my mixed metaphor, eh Tad? mike |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
List of the world's shortwave relay stations (from HFCC) | Broadcasting | |||
The Pool | Policy | |||
Base Closures | Shortwave | |||
Amateur Radio Legal Issues List | General | |||
Amateur Radio Legal Issues List | Homebrew |