Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Volker Tonn ) writes:
Jim schrieb: I also put a pair of back-to-back glass switching diodes across the external antenna input (across the 2.2K resistor that had already been added by TenTec to bleed off static buildup), so in future the diode should blow rather than the FET's. It seems that almost the whole factory is up at Dayton.... he he.. The same many have done to the Sony ICF2010/ 2001D to prevent blowing the FET (again). I did 2 times 2 diodes in series antiparallel for 0.7 Volts for each diode. So in addition there is a maximum voltage of 1.4 volts to the antenna input. This one diode with 0.7 volts could make you think your S-meter reading is going nuts as it will never show more than S9+10dB or so. Even the 1.4 volts of 2 diodes in series will only give you addtional 3dBs. Just a thought.... But there are very few cases where one would be receiving more than 0.7volts. If you're in such a strong field that those diodes are conducting, you may have plenty of distortion from one of the active devices. If the field is strong enough for the diodes to conduct, the radio likely was overloading anyway. We're talking close to an actual transmitter. The diodes are there for protection from really strong local signals, and I suppose even before that, in an attempt to protect from static generated locally. Under normal use they will never conduct. One of the keys to this problem seems to be that the gates of the FETs are operating at a high impedance. It's not that the FETs are particularly sensitive, but that if there's a high impedance there's less of a load on the high voltages of static from right around you. A low impedance point means the voltage is shorted to ground so it's not high enough to destroy the junction. Wait, I suppose it depends on where those diodes are. If they are just across the antenna jack, the above applies. If they are put at a high impedance point, like the secondary of a tuned circuit right at the antenna, perhaps there would be enough step-up for a weaker signal to start being significant voltage at that point. Michael |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Santa Claus Post is a Trojan!!! | Scanner | |||
ON6DP QSL-Manager Database , Update Jan_2004 | Dx | |||
ON6DP QSL-Manager Database, November 2003 Update | Dx | |||
WinScan780 Update Now Available | Scanner | |||
Testing TMOS FETs | Homebrew |