why is the BBC
 

Why is the BBC so anti-Bush when the BBC itself is located at

"Bush House, London". ;)

Waterperson77 wrote:

Why is the BBC so anti-Bush when the BBC itself is located at

"Bush House, London". ;)



It's the morals of the landlord.




mike

In article ,
says...

Why is the BBC so anti-Bush when the BBC itself is located at

"Bush House, London". ;)

If reporting what is going on is anti-Bush, maybe Bush
should consider doing things differently so the news
isn't so negative.

FW

"Frank White" wrote in message
...
In article ,
says...

Why is the BBC so anti-Bush when the BBC itself is located at

"Bush House, London". ;)

If reporting what is going on is anti-Bush, maybe Bush
should consider doing things differently so the news
isn't so negative.


That's one solution. Another might be for media outlets like the BBC
to consider doing things differently so their reporters don't permit
their personal politics to determine whether a negative approach is
warranted.

It's Kate Bush's house, not Shrub's sphincter shack!

elg110254 wrote:

...Shrub's sphincter shack!



http://www.weirdlinks.com/rumsfield-...ure-prison.htm




mike

On Wed, 19 May 2004 00:35:31 -0400, "T. Early"
wrote:


"Frank White" wrote in message
...
In article ,
says...

Why is the BBC so anti-Bush when the BBC itself is located at

"Bush House, London". ;)

If reporting what is going on is anti-Bush, maybe Bush
should consider doing things differently so the news
isn't so negative.


That's one solution. Another might be for media outlets like the BBC
to consider doing things differently so their reporters don't permit
their personal politics to determine whether a negative approach is
warranted.


Can you give some concrete examples of when and where on the BBC this
has happened?

wrote in message
...
On Wed, 19 May 2004 00:35:31 -0400, "T. Early"
wrote:


"Frank White" wrote in message
...
In article ,
says...

Why is the BBC so anti-Bush when the BBC itself is located at

"Bush House, London". ;)

If reporting what is going on is anti-Bush, maybe Bush
should consider doing things differently so the news
isn't so negative.


That's one solution. Another might be for media outlets like the
BBC
to consider doing things differently so their reporters don't
permit
their personal politics to determine whether a negative approach is
warranted.


Can you give some concrete examples of when and where on the BBC
this
has happened?

http://www.the-hutton-inquiry.org.uk/content/report/

Your welcome.

"T. Early" wrote in message
...

wrote in message
...
On Wed, 19 May 2004 00:35:31 -0400, "T. Early"
wrote:


"Frank White" wrote in message
...
In article
,
says...

Why is the BBC so anti-Bush when the BBC itself is located at

"Bush House, London". ;)

If reporting what is going on is anti-Bush, maybe Bush
should consider doing things differently so the news
isn't so negative.


That's one solution. Another might be for media outlets like the
BBC
to consider doing things differently so their reporters don't
permit
their personal politics to determine whether a negative approach
is
warranted.


Can you give some concrete examples of when and where on the BBC
this
has happened?

http://www.the-hutton-inquiry.org.uk/content/report/

Your welcome.

Ouch, that would be "you're welcome" :)

= = = "T. Early" wrote in message
= = = ...
"Frank White" wrote in message
...
In article ,
says...

Why is the BBC so anti-Bush when the BBC itself is located at

"Bush House, London". ;)

If reporting what is going on is anti-Bush, maybe Bush
should consider doing things differently so the news
isn't so negative.


That's one solution. Another might be for media outlets like the BBC
to consider doing things differently so their reporters don't permit
their personal politics to determine whether a negative approach is
warranted.

TE,

The BBC and it's Reporters 'believe' that They are Right
with a Certainty and therefore They are Not Biased.
[ They are Blinded by Their Own Biases. ]

Such is the Power of Belief ~ RHF

..