Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#21
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
craigm wrote:
"starman" wrote in message ... The traditional single gang 10-365 cap' was used to tune the oscillator in a MW radio, not a front-end preselector. The oscillator usually operated at 455-Khz (I.F.) *above* the desired frequency. This would be about 995-Khz for the low end (540-Khz) of the band. That's why a variable cap' with a maximum of 365-pf is not really low enough (practical) when you want to use it as a tuning cap' for a MW loop antenna or preselector. This is because it has to tune down to the actual lower limit of the MW band (540) instead of the receiver's oscillator frequency (995) at the low end. I don't think so. If you have a single gang cap in an AM radio, then it is tuning an antenna coil. If you have an oscillator in a traditional radio, then you have a superhet and will see a two or three gang capacitor. The most frequent thing I've seen for the AM broadcast band is a dual gang capacitor with the oscillator section having about 75% of the capacity of the antenna/RF section. When you see a dual 365 pF cap used in a superhet, you will also see a pad cap in series with the oscillator section so that the oscillator tracks at the needed 455 kHz offset. With a 265 uH coil and a parallel capacitance of 10 pF it resonates at 3093 kHz. With a 265 uH coil and a parallel capacitance of 365 pF it resonates at 512 kHz. This is more than enough for the AM broadcast band. However in real life one gets some stray capacitance due to wiring. Adding 20 pF for stray capacitance, we get. With a 265 uH coil and a parallel capacitance of 30 pF it resonates at 1785 kHz. With a 265 uH coil and a parallel capacitance of 385 pF it resonates at 498 kHz. Still, this is more than adequate. Given the right inductance and keeping stray capacitance low, 365 pF is enough. If you need more capacitance, it probably means your stray capacitance is very high and you reduced the number of turns in the loop (inductance) to offset that problem and then added more variable capacitance to cover the low end of the band. craigm I was thinking of a superhet with a single gang cap' to tune the oscillator and no front-end preselection tuning, which would require another gang on the cap'. -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FA:Heathkit Variable voltage bench power supply | Equipment | |||
FA:Heathkit Variable voltage bench power supply | Equipment | |||
FA:Heathkit Variable voltage bench power supply | Equipment | |||
FS: old radio parts, coils, variable caps, toroids, Loral disk capassortment, GC-Stackpole resistor assortment | Boatanchors | |||
Variable stub | Antenna |