Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Stephen M.H. Lawrence" wrote in message hlink.net... "Frank Dresser" wrote: | Currently, the FCC limits AM stations to a bandwidth of 20 kHz, or an audio | bandwidth of 10 kHz. Thirty years ago, there wasn't an explicit limit, | stations were required to limit their bandwidth to limit interference. I thought that the NRSC standard is 7.5 KHz? I've got an old Popular Electronics magazine article around here somewhere which claims the the 20 kHz max AM bandwidth. The author seemed knowledgeable, but I also have a couple of textbooks which claim a 10 kHz max AM bandwidth. I don't trust the textbooks, so I searched the FCC website. I came up with: 3. Sound Broadcasting Sound broadcasting, double-sideband.. BINFn/INF=2M, M may vary between 4000 and 10000 depending on the quality desired This defination was among a group above the FCC's formulas: BINFn/INF = Necessary bandwidth in hertz So, if I'm reading this correctly, the necessary bandwidth for standard AM will be twice the audio bandwidth, which must be between a minimum audio bandwidth of 4000 Hz and a maximum audio bandwidth of 10,000Hz. This is from: http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/get-cfr.cgi?TITLE=47&PART=2&SECTION=202&YEAR=2001&TYPE =TEXT At any rate, a practical bandwidth of 10 KHz would be a nice improvement. Yeah, I think few broadcasters get near the maximum. But, considering the average AM radio, why bother? Frank Dresser |