Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , starman
wrote: Flander's Fartwhistle wrote: DRM and it's digital broadcasting mode children will never appear on shortwave. Mark it in your book. Analog will be here for a very long time to come, as any digital dependent mode requires a clear signal path for reception. When was the last time we heard a clear shortwave program or station that had ZERO fading, noise or propagation issues with it's signal? My guess is you can count them on one hand. A perfect example is how everyone has had to endure poor signal degradation from someone using a modern cellphone. 20% of the calls I get from people out in the field usually cut out or are partially garbled, and I am using a brand new Samsung and Nokia digital phone. Any loss of "data" between you and 'over there/wherever' on the other end of the cellphone line and your call is useless or interrupted. If it's this bad with local Verizon cell phone service in a major metro area (NJ/NY/Ct) then how bad will it be with a digital shortwave signal comming halfway around the world on a much lower frequency prone to atmospherics and other degradation...? Digital Shortwave???? Sounds alot like New Coke or the Yugo car or any one of another 'brilliant' consumer technology or product ideas that are now in the rubbish bin of history. The success of DRM doesn't depend on perfect propagation conditions. If it did, the proponents of this technology wouldn't consider using it for ionospheric propagation. It's a matter of how degraded the conditions can be before the digital signal can not be decoded properly. DRM has considerable tolerance for poor propagation. The cell phone comparison is apples and oranges. They are two very different technologies and frequency ranges. If DRM fails to catch on, it will most likely be because people don't want to buy new receivers for international broadcasting when it appears to have an uncertain future at this time. The FEC in DRM is pretty weak. FEC in stable medium just to overcome the stable defects needs to be about 1/3 of the transmitted overhead. DRM does not even provide this much for a non stable path and so it is completely inadequate for HF propagation. DRM on SW is not unlike pounding screws into wood with a hammer instead of using a screw driver. The hammer will pound in the screws just like a nail but you will not derive the benefit of using the screw over the nail for greater fastening power by pounding it in with the hammer. The wheels came off this technology before it even got started. DRM - the claims amount to a Michael Bryant type of non reality. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
I wonder... | Shortwave | |||
USA Domestic Shortwave Broadcasters (CONUS) | Shortwave | |||
WHERE ARE ALL THE TOUGH GUYS IN THIS SHORTWAVE NEWSGROUP? | Shortwave | |||
WHERE ARE ALL THE TOUGH GUYS IN THIS SHORTWAVE NEWSGROUP? | Shortwave | |||
WHERE ARE ALL THE TOUGH GUYS IN THIS SHORTWAVE NEWSGROUP? | General |