Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Nuclear is one option, but I am not so sure it's the only one. For
example, Denmark right now generates 15% of their electricity with wind factories. I also think hydrogen is expensive to manufacture, was not aware that ethanol also is. I think that Brazil has cheap ethanol manufacturing plants from sugar cane (and corn? not sure). (WShoots1) wrote in message ... The real cure is Hydrogen Providing electricity used to make it is generated by a source using renewable energy. It takes 4 to 10 times as much energy to make hydrogen than the resulting hydrogen provides. Ethanol has the same negative efficiency problem. For the long term, only nuclear powered electricity generating plants will provide most of the necessary energy for direct and (hydrogen making) indirect uses. Bill, K5BY |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Coax Switch To Switch One Antenna Lead Between Several HF Transceivers ? | Antenna | |||
Wandering Foot Switch | Dx | |||
Wandering Foot Switch | Dx | |||
Urgent: 5000 Euro Reward | Scanner | |||
FS: Drake CS-7 Coax Switch | Boatanchors |