Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Icom R75 with all the Kiwa mods, including the complete attenuation removal
is roughly equal to Drake R8B in both SW AND MW performance. True or false? Please note that this is not an attempt to start a flamefest. Ideally I'd like to have an opinion from folks who run or have run both machines side by side. Cheers, MvBB |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Margaret von Busenhalter-Butt wrote:
Icom R75 with all the Kiwa mods, including the complete attenuation removal is roughly equal to Drake R8B in both SW AND MW performance. True or false? Please note that this is not an attempt to start a flamefest. Ideally I'd like to have an opinion from folks who run or have run both machines side by side. Cheers, MvBB Roughly true but it still tips the balance in favor of the R8B if you are a program listener more than a SSB/utility listener. -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have both (my R-75 is unmodified). They seem about equal, with
maybe a slight tip to the ICOM for UTE and tough signal DX. The Drake has the more listener-friendly features for plain old program listening. Bottom line: If you can only afford 1 radio and listen to SWBC and MW a lot, get the Drake. If you lean toward UTE, Digital Modes and tough signal DX get the ICOM. On Mon, 31 May 2004 03:34:24 -0400, longwave wrote: Margaret von Busenhalter-Butt wrote: Icom R75 with all the Kiwa mods, including the complete attenuation removal is roughly equal to Drake R8B in both SW AND MW performance. True or false? Please note that this is not an attempt to start a flamefest. Ideally I'd like to have an opinion from folks who run or have run both machines side by side. Cheers, MvBB Roughly true but it still tips the balance in favor of the R8B if you are a program listener more than a SSB/utility listener. -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 31 May 2004 03:46:46 GMT, "Margaret von Busenhalter-Butt"
wrote: Icom R75 with all the Kiwa mods, including the complete attenuation removal is roughly equal to Drake R8B in both SW AND MW performance. True or false? Please note that this is not an attempt to start a flamefest. Ideally I'd like to have an opinion from folks who run or have run both machines side by side. Cheers, MvBB There is a reason the Drake R8B has near legend in status, and no amount of tinkering with a lesser receiver will make it equal. However the difference are not things that most people are every likely to hear, in the lab they can be measured, they can rarely be heard. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() matt weber wrote: On Mon, 31 May 2004 03:46:46 GMT, "Margaret von Busenhalter-Butt" wrote: Icom R75 with all the Kiwa mods, including the complete attenuation removal is roughly equal to Drake R8B in both SW AND MW performance. True or false? Please note that this is not an attempt to start a flamefest. Ideally I'd like to have an opinion from folks who run or have run both machines side by side. Cheers, MvBB There is a reason the Drake R8B has near legend in status, and no amount of tinkering with a lesser receiver will make it equal. However the difference are not things that most people are every likely to hear, in the lab they can be measured, they can rarely be heard. Keep telling yourself that as you operate a 'lesser' receiver! |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
SECRET ICOM SALE: R-75 $425 W/ DSP AND FREE SHIPPING | General | |||
Icom 756, Icom 275, Icom SM-8 (Reduced) | Equipment | |||
Icom 756, Icom 275, Icom SM-8 (Reduced) | Equipment | |||
Icom 756, Icom 275, Icom SM-8 (Reduced) | Equipment | |||
Icom 756, Icom 275, Icom SM-8 | Equipment |