Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dave Platt" wrote in message ... In article flFxc.1843$2i5.155@attbi_s52, AK wrote: Great. If BPL is unworkable, let it fail in the marketplace. That's one of those nonsense comments that sounds good, but doesn't work. Once "the marketplace" gets tested, amateur radio and most of the other users of HF and MF radio reception will be out of business - never to bounce back once destroyed. Meanwhile, BPL will be "workable" for those areas that never had good cable access and where people were too cheap to use satellite or telephone alternatives. BPL isn't "unworkable" - it's the "unreasonable" sacrifices that must be made to allow nationwide radio spectrum disruption for some trivial gain to a few people and a few big businesses. There's an interesting analogy to this situation playing out in the airwaves right now. My understanding of this situation is as follows (and may be a bit incorrect). Some years ago, the FCC decided to allow a company which I believe was called Fleet Telecommunications to set up some digital-packet-oriented communication on a set of frequencies in the 800 MHz range. These frequencies were located quite close to the 800 MHz narrow-band FM channels allocated to publics-safety ground (trunked police and fire systems, etc.). There was concern expressed at the time that these digital channels might cause interference with the existing analog channels (intermodulation and receiver desensing, I think). The FCC agreed to allow the allocations, on the condition that the digital operator ensure that interference to existing allocations would not occur or would be abated. Subsequently (I'm hazy on the details) Fleet either went out of business or was bought up... in either case, Nextel ended up as the owner of these 800 MHz digital allocations. Nextel has used them as the basis of much of its current-generation cellphone system. The result: significant, and sometimes very severe, interference to public-safety radio operations. There have been numerous reports of police and firefighters being unable to use their radios successfully, when in proximity to Nextel cellular sites. This has resulted in very real danger to life-and-limb for police officers and firefighters. Nextel has taken some steps to abate specific instances of this (reducing power) when it's called to their attention, but the problem remains. There's a whole massive brouhaha taking place now, about "rebanding" the 800 MHz spectrum. This will probably involve consolidating the public-safety frequencies (requiring modification or replacement of much equipment - Nextel has offered to pay $billions to do this but there's concern that it'll cost twice that much), and moving at least some of Nextel's cellular allocations upwards to a higher frequency band. Nextel wants a big block of spectrum space in compensation, while other companies claim that the FCC has no legal authority to simply hand over that space to Nextel and that the law requires the spectrum to be auctioned to the highest bidder. No matter what the FCC decides to do, it's likely to end up being challenged in Federal court and delayed for years. It's a horrible mess. Some claim that the FCC *could* have acted, on its own authority, to order Nextel to shut down operations in the interleaved bands, because their system is apparently violating the "we will not cause interference to other licensed operations" clauses which were part of the original Fleet allocation grant. The FCC has apparently asserted that it doesn't have authority to act on its own in the absence of a formal legal complaint from a public-safety radio organization... and no city or county or state has been willing to file such a complaint (perhaps because the cost of pursuing it against a deep-pockets company like Nextel would be very high indeed). I agree that if BPL is rolled out en mass, it _is_ likely to cause serious interference with HF operations (amateur and otherwise), and that the momentum of "Hey, we've invested billions to field BPL, you can't just shut us down" is likely to override the original "No, there won't be interference" promised. That's real interesting about Nextel. My experience with the 800 MHz bands (LTR trunking systems) ended before digital cell phones existed, but I can certainly believe that frequency spreading must cause some com channel interference if you are near the transmitter site. Well, anyone who really believes that the FCC will mitigate interference to amateur radio that is caused by big-lobbying power companies should also believe in "temporary taxes" and Santa Clause. AK |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|