LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #12   Report Post  
Old June 16th 04, 05:14 AM
Frank Dresser
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Jon Noring" wrote in message
...

[snip]


This is functionally *equivalent* to having 120+ independent and
optimized TRF circuits (one for each channel) -- that's what I
intended to say.

[snip]

How would each of the 120+ independent TRF circuits get optimized? With a
scope and a sweep and marker generator? Any one of the channels might be
easy enough, but 120 is asking alot. Even moreso, with the complication of
Wide/DX option. And it's not like there a wonderful victory after the
struggle. Wideband AM sometimes sounds very good, and sometimes not.

Have you heard wideband AM?

Frank Dresser


 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Channel-based AM tube tuner (was Designs for a single frequency high performance AM-MW receiver?) Jon Noring Shortwave 103 June 30th 04 07:13 PM
Interested in high-performance tube-based AM tuner designs Jon Noring Shortwave 85 June 14th 04 01:36 AM
AM Tube Tuner Kit -- candidate models from yesteryear? Jon Noring Shortwave 5 June 11th 04 12:52 AM
MFJ969 Tuner Question Gene Vico Equipment 4 November 13th 03 12:27 AM
MFJ969 Tuner Question Gene Vico Equipment 0 November 12th 03 01:36 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:39 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017