| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Jon Noring" wrote in message ... [snip] This is functionally *equivalent* to having 120+ independent and optimized TRF circuits (one for each channel) -- that's what I intended to say. [snip] How would each of the 120+ independent TRF circuits get optimized? With a scope and a sweep and marker generator? Any one of the channels might be easy enough, but 120 is asking alot. Even moreso, with the complication of Wide/DX option. And it's not like there a wonderful victory after the struggle. Wideband AM sometimes sounds very good, and sometimes not. Have you heard wideband AM? Frank Dresser |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Channel-based AM tube tuner (was Designs for a single frequency high performance AM-MW receiver?) | Shortwave | |||
| Interested in high-performance tube-based AM tuner designs | Shortwave | |||
| AM Tube Tuner Kit -- candidate models from yesteryear? | Shortwave | |||
| MFJ969 Tuner Question | Equipment | |||
| MFJ969 Tuner Question | Equipment | |||