Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jon Noring" wrote in message ... [snip] This is functionally *equivalent* to having 120+ independent and optimized TRF circuits (one for each channel) -- that's what I intended to say. [snip] How would each of the 120+ independent TRF circuits get optimized? With a scope and a sweep and marker generator? Any one of the channels might be easy enough, but 120 is asking alot. Even moreso, with the complication of Wide/DX option. And it's not like there a wonderful victory after the struggle. Wideband AM sometimes sounds very good, and sometimes not. Have you heard wideband AM? Frank Dresser |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Channel-based AM tube tuner (was Designs for a single frequency high performance AM-MW receiver?) | Shortwave | |||
Interested in high-performance tube-based AM tuner designs | Shortwave | |||
AM Tube Tuner Kit -- candidate models from yesteryear? | Shortwave | |||
MFJ969 Tuner Question | Equipment | |||
MFJ969 Tuner Question | Equipment |