Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#22
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Bill wrote:
John Byrns wrote: In article , Bill wrote: I wish that Jon could actually experience this and see that his thinking 'outside the box' isn't going to be an automatic revelation that 80 years of radio has simply overlooked. Thirty minutes on the bench could save 'light-hours' of ramblings. I don't follow your reasoning on this, what is Jon going to learn in "Thirty minutes on the bench"? I would venture next to nothing? Thirty weeks on the bench might be more like it, and even then there won't be time to explore all avenues. As far as 80 years of radio go, Jon's constraints are different than might have existed when tube radios were a mass application, he may be able to make different tradeoffs than were practical then. Don't be silly just for the sake of being a 'devils advocate', John. I'm not being the "devils advocate", I'm just saying that the problem is more complex than you are making it out to be and a mere thirty minutes on the bench is not going to resolve much. If Jon can achieve his plug-in TRF boards with any semblance of a $1.95 flea-market AA5 selectivity then I would be pleased. These threads have grown to a point where I have not been able to follow them all. I have been following most of the discussions like the superhet, TRF, and segmentation of the MW band posts, but I have not yet read the ones related to channel based receivers, which I hope to read through as time permits. Perhaps that explains my confusion with relation to the "thirty minutes on the bench", if you are referring to a channelized TRF approach to receive all 117 or so MW channels, then I would think you wouldn't need to go to the bench at all to realize it isn't practical. A smaller number of channels, say half a dozen or so might be practical. I think the best approach for the all out audiophile would be the one suggested by Randy, or was it Sherry? Gutting out a National NC-100, and rebuilding the band selection assembly with 5 sets of 3 optimized band pass filters to segment the MW band into 5 parts. Regards, John Byrns Surf my web pages at, http://users.rcn.com/jbyrns/ |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Channel-based AM tube tuner (was Designs for a single frequency high performance AM-MW receiver?) | Shortwave | |||
Interested in high-performance tube-based AM tuner designs | Shortwave | |||
AM Tube Tuner Kit -- candidate models from yesteryear? | Shortwave | |||
MFJ969 Tuner Question | Equipment | |||
MFJ969 Tuner Question | Equipment |