"Stephen M.H. Lawrence" wrote ...


Yup. Bryant's post calling for the shooting of conservatives was, in my own
opinion, lower than low, and indicative of serious underlying problems.


Don't guess I saw that one, Bro. Lawrence. Sure is odd - you'd think
liberals would celebrate diversity and stuff. Now you tell me he
wants me shot because I'm diverse from him.

Woe is me. But I'll be stickin' to my right wing Republican, Orthodox
Reformed Bible-Thumpin' Presbyterian ways.

And if the liberals want me shot, then they can just shoot me.

As long as it's done to promote diversity.

It's more likely that he either A: got busted smoking pot again or B: got
tired of his argumentative attitude and general dishonesty.
"-=jd=-" wrote in message
Bull****! I call Bull****!

If you expect anyone to believe that you lost your job due to usenet
posts, you are more pathetic than I would have *ever* imagined.

Anyone who buy's into this BS tear-jerk tale deserves the horse-laughing
they will get.


-=jd=-
--
My Current Disposable Email:

(Remove YOUR HAT to reply directly)

From: (LW)

"Stephen M.H. Lawrence" wrote ...


Yup. Bryant's post calling for the shooting of conservatives was, in my
own
opinion, lower than low, and indicative of serious underlying problems.


Don't guess I saw that one, Bro. Lawrence. Sure is odd - you'd think
liberals would celebrate diversity and stuff. Now you tell me he
wants me shot because I'm diverse from him.


I was responding to a right-wing conservative who said pochers should be shot
on sight without a trial. I was attempting to show him how stupid that line
was. Little did I think that all the neocons in the NG would take the joke out
of context. Their humor is unidirectional.


Michael Bryant, WA4009SWL
Louisville, KY
R75, S800, RX320, SW77, ICF2010K,
DX398, 7600G, 6800W, RF2200, 7600A
GE SRll, Pro-2006, Pro-2010, Pro-76
(remove "nojunk" to reply)

"Michael Bryant" wrote in message
...
| From: (LW)
|
| "Stephen M.H. Lawrence" wrote ...
|
|
| Yup. Bryant's post calling for the shooting of conservatives was, in
my
| own
| opinion, lower than low, and indicative of serious underlying problems.
|
|
| Don't guess I saw that one, Bro. Lawrence. Sure is odd - you'd think
| liberals would celebrate diversity and stuff. Now you tell me he
| wants me shot because I'm diverse from him.
|
|
| I was responding to a right-wing conservative who said pochers should be
shot
| on sight without a trial. I was attempting to show him how stupid that
line
| was. Little did I think that all the neocons in the NG would take the joke
out
| of context. Their humor is unidirectional.

I thought you quit the group, Brybaby.

You're even worse than Lloyd Davies - you thrive on lies, don't you?

--
Steve Lawrence
KAØPMD
Burnsville, Minnesota

(NOTE: My email address has only one "dot."
You'll have to edit out the one between the "7"
and the "3" in my email address if you wish to
reply via email)


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.688 / Virus Database: 449 - Release Date: 5/18/04

"LW" wrote in message
m...
| ocom (Michael Bryant) wrote ...
|
|
| I was responding to a right-wing conservative who said pochers should be
shot
| on sight without a trial. I was attempting to show him how stupid that
line
| was. Little did I think that all the neocons in the NG would take the
joke out
| of context. Their humor is unidirectional.
|
|
| Thanx for the clarfication.
|
| Now to balance the reporting, let's hear from a *left wing*
| conservative on the matter.
|
| Bush-Cheney 04.
|
| Rumsfeld-Rice 08.
|
| ( Take it, Bro. Lawrence ! ! ! )

Right you are, Brother El Dubyah!

(and, for what it's worth, an ultraliberal like Brybaby talking about humor
is really the definition of "irony." But I digress!)

WWRRD? (What Would Ronald Reagan Do?)

Come to think of it, what would John Wayne do?

Naww, what would MICHAEL SAVAGE do?
He's threatening to run for political office tonight?

Hmmm...hey, here's one: What would PROFIT STAIR DO?

Now, there's the answer. I bet he could come up with a false
prediction, and make everything "all right."

Profit Stair for President in 2012! I'm telling you, I think I'm
onto a great idea. Not even Hitlery Rotten Clinton could stop
Profit Stair - he'd steamroller her and her nag gang like a
"Thundarberd" running over fresh baloney!

What do you think of *them* apples, Brother El Dubyah?

73,

--
Steve Lawrence
KAØPMD
Burnsville, Minnesota

(NOTE: My email address has only one "dot."
You'll have to edit out the one between the "7"
and the "3" in my email address if you wish to
reply via email)


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.688 / Virus Database: 449 - Release Date: 5/18/04

"Stephen M.H. Lawrence" wrote ...


What do you think of *them* apples, Brother El Dubyah?

Well I hafta admit the Rumsfeld-Rice thing wasn't original - I "seen"
it soaped on the back "winder" of a camper cover on a pick-em-up-truck
in the flea market at Dayton Hamfest d'other week.

The only one I've heard that rings nicer is Kerry-Sharpton '04. Gotta
love that one. It'll have every Kommie-Krat south of Pittsburgh
voting for Dubyah. Diversity, ya' know. A good show if
bi-partisanship, don'tcha see.

Now if Hillary was to get elected in '08, I'm sure Billy-Bob would be
glad to interview the interns so she could turn to the nation's more
pressing issues. Like cattle futures and pharmaceutical stocks.

Yeah - Hillary and Janet might be a good ticket for the Kommie-Krats
in '08.

Maybe have profit Stair for White House chaplain.

Michael Bryant wrote:

From: dxAce

Here is the text verbatim...

Steve,

I can only assume that you did that because you assume I'm Curmudgeon. Guess
what? I'm not. Really. I think that his complaints to your newsgroup provider
were wrong and reprehensible. His constant harassment of your was hypocritical
and probably from someone that was attempting to make you go off on on me.
Thus, the "puppet" language. I don't even know how to fake IP addresses.

Steve, you've cost me my job. Maybe you didn't do it, but someone did using the
address you posted. I don't know what to say. I'm sorry for my involvement in
making this such a super-heated situation. I'm due to go to the hospital for
surgery in just an hour or so, and this has not helped. This has left me
without the means to support my family.

OK, if you were due to go to the hospital for surgery in just an hour or so (posted
at 7:07 AM), why is it that about an hour and a half later you are on the phone
with me?

Then at 11:40 AM you are posting again?

Pretty quick surgery.

More puzzles.

"MnMikew" wrote in message
...

"-=jd=-" wrote in message
...
On Thu 17 Jun 2004 05:01:25p, dxAce wrote in
message :



-=jd=- wrote:

On Thu 17 Jun 2004 03:20:49p, "MnMikew" wrote in
message :


"-=jd=-" wrote in message
...
On Thu 17 Jun 2004 02:41:37p, "MnMikew" wrote
in
message :


"-=jd=-" wrote in message
...

What kind of job exposes you to termination because of a silly
flame-war on
usenet?

Most of them if your posting from work.



See my other post regarding "University" jobs...


I doubt they're any different.




You should check it out - Don't just take my word for it.
Every university system that I've heard about, either through a
friend
who attended or through one of the projects I've worked on, is *very*
liberal with connections to the commodity internet. The only
restrictions I've seen is to manage bandwidth to certain nodes. I
have
yet to see or hear of *any* censorship or similar usage restrictions
on
any *statutorily legal* content.

If MWB suffered *any* sanction via his University employer, it's a
fairly safe bet it wasn't due to his on-line activites, unless they
were patently illegal (ie kiddie-porn). I doubt very seriously he was
involved with that type of activity.

I actually don't think *anything* has happened to him as he has been
so
prone to deception, diversion and misleading tactics in the past that
I
have no rational reason to believe that he's not playing each and
every
one of you for a fool now.

If you want to buy into his load of tripe, by all means go ahead - I
have no problem with it. What I *do* have a problem with is when you
cop an attitude when I horse-laugh you for falling for it.

I know this is just usenet, but "get real"...

I just called the Louisville Tech 800 number and the woman I spoke to
told me he was still employed there.

She then directed me to his voice mail (I did not leave a message).

Just another darn interesting day!


Hilarious too, when you count all of his kindred souls falling for his
ruse...

Perhaps we're being duped. He probably got called on the carpet at the
most.
Still, leave peoples family and employer out of Usenet, PERIOD!



Damn, you're gullible.

-- Stinger

From: dxAce

OK, if you were due to go to the hospital for surgery in just an hour or so
(posted
at 7:07 AM), why is it that about an hour and a half later you are on the
phone
with me?

Then at 11:40 AM you are posting again?

Pretty quick surgery.

More puzzles.


The hospital, the DuPont Surgery Center, called and said not to bother showing
up until 1pm on the 17th, as my doctor, Dr. Blair, was going to be tied up in
another surgery.

BTW, the operation didn't go so well. I was left with a cornea that has
developed a sack of fluid around it. As of now I have almost no vision in my
left eye. They've given my two bottles of drops that I have to put in my eyes
two times a day in the hopes of the vision improving.

Steve, calm down. Be the nice guy you were on the phone. I thought your NG
behavior was mainly an act and after talking to you there's no doubt in my
mind.

Peace,




Michael Bryant, WA4009SWL
Louisville, KY
R75, S800, RX320, SW77, ICF2010K,
DX398, 7600G, 6800W, RF2200, 7600A
GE SRll, Pro-2006, Pro-2010, Pro-76
(remove "nojunk" to reply)