| Page 1 of 2 | 1 | 2 |
|
|
Bryants last email to me
Here is the text verbatim...
Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: From: Date: Sat, 5 Jun 2004 22:47:45 EDT Subject: Please Read To: X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV version 0.70, clamav-milter version 0.70j Steve, You win. I'll do whatever you please. Please don't drag my employers into this newsgroup ****. I'm willing to publicly apologize and leave the NG. I'll never send you another email. I need my job. Please. I don't have your savings. Please think of my family. Mike Bryant +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Personally, I'm growing tired of the Fat Boy's antics. By the way, he works at: http://www.louisvilletech.com/conten...=&siteid=&app= Steve Holland, MI Drake R7, R8 and R8B http://www.iserv.net/~n8kdv/dxpage.htm |
In article ,
dxAce wrote: Here is the text verbatim... Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: From: Date: Sat, 5 Jun 2004 22:47:45 EDT Subject: Please Read To: X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV version 0.70, clamav-milter version 0.70j Steve, You win. I'll do whatever you please. Please don't drag my employers into this newsgroup ****. I'm willing to publicly apologize and leave the NG. I'll never send you another email. I need my job. Please. I don't have your savings. Please think of my family. Mike Bryant +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Personally, I'm growing tired of the Fat Boy's antics. By the way, he works at: http://www.louisvilletech.com/conten...=&siteid=&app= Steve Holland, MI Drake R7, R8 and R8B http://www.iserv.net/~n8kdv/dxpage.htm So that is why he's not around. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
Cuss,
You should have not posted this!!! -- Burr Grundigs, 200, YB400, 650 & 800 Drake SW3 Scanners, BC245 & 895 Ont, Ca 34.03.16N 117.36.21W RC, Ca. 35.35.82N 117.41.57W "dxAce" wrote in message ... Here is the text verbatim... Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: From: Date: Sat, 5 Jun 2004 22:47:45 EDT Subject: Please Read To: X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV version 0.70, clamav-milter version 0.70j Steve, You win. I'll do whatever you please. Please don't drag my employers into this newsgroup ****. I'm willing to publicly apologize and leave the NG. I'll never send you another email. I need my job. Please. I don't have your savings. Please think of my family. Mike Bryant +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Personally, I'm growing tired of the Fat Boy's antics. By the way, he works at: http://www.louisvilletech.com/conten...=&siteid=&app= Steve Holland, MI Drake R7, R8 and R8B http://www.iserv.net/~n8kdv/dxpage.htm |
dxAce wrote:
Here is the text verbatim... What exactly is wrong with your head? I already know what's wrong with you ethics. If that email is real, your actions are the lowest I've seen on this newsgroup. Does acting like a scum come naturally to you? mike |
On Wed, 16 Jun 2004 22:24:25 -0400, dxAce
wrote: Here is the text verbatim... Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: From: Date: Sat, 5 Jun 2004 22:47:45 EDT Subject: Please Read To: X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV version 0.70, clamav-milter version 0.70j Steve, You win. I'll do whatever you please. Please don't drag my employers into this newsgroup ****. I'm willing to publicly apologize and leave the NG. I'll never send you another email. I need my job. Please. I don't have your savings. Please think of my family. Mike Bryant +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Personally, I'm growing tired of the Fat Boy's antics. By the way, he works at: http://www.louisvilletech.com/conten...=&siteid=&app= Steve Holland, MI Drake R7, R8 and R8B http://www.iserv.net/~n8kdv/dxpage.htm haha...good job! Tracy |
|
m II wrote: dxAce wrote: Here is the text verbatim... What exactly is wrong with your head? I already know what's wrong with you ethics. My ethics are far superiour to Bryant's, probably yours too. If that email is real, your actions are the lowest I've seen on this newsgroup. Of course it's real. I don't sit here and fabricate and lie like you and Bryant! Does acting like a scum come naturally to you? You'll have to fill me in on how scum acts. I'd like to hear from an experienced individual such as yourself. Steve Holland, MI Drake R7, R8 and R8B |
Michael Bryant wrote: From: dxAce Here is the text verbatim... Steve, I can only assume that you did that because you assume I'm Curmudgeon. Guess what? I'm not. Really. I think that his complaints to your newsgroup provider were wrong and reprehensible. His constant harassment of your was hypocritical and probably from someone that was attempting to make you go off on on me. Thus, the "puppet" language. I don't even know how to fake IP addresses. Steve, you've cost me my job. Maybe you didn't do it, but someone did using the address you posted. I don't know what to say. I'm sorry for my involvement in making this such a super-heated situation. I'm due to go to the hospital for surgery in just an hour or so, and this has not helped. This has left me without the means to support my family. I will never set foot in this NG again under any name. I sincerely apologize to Stave Lare for anything I've ever done that pushes a human being to engagee in this type of nonsense. Steve, there are obviously people in here that want to push you into doing silly things. They are not me. Finished, forever, with this nonsense. Curmudgeon, whoever you are, please stop bothering Steve! He will simply keep assuming it's me. And that's already caused enough damage in my life. Gone, Michael Bryant, WA4009SWL Louisville, KY R75, S800, RX320, SW77, ICF2010K, DX398, 7600G, 6800W, RF2200, 7600A GE SRll, Pro-2006, Pro-2010, Pro-76 (remove "nojunk" to reply) Damn, it must be easier to get someone fired these days than I thought. So, someone contacted Louisville Tech... just what did they say? Bryant posts at RRS? Fire him? LOL... |
|
|
-=jd=- wrote:
I see absolutely nothing wrong with it at all. In fact, I think it serves as an *excellent* demonstration that "Free Speech" works both ways -AND- that those who proclaim it the loudest seems to be the last to realize that fact! Cry me a river... The email was sent in an expectation of privacy and was a request NOT to bother his employers. A public disclosure of it is about the same as a wire tap on an unknowing person. It stinks. How would you feel if someone close to you lost a job because of some unimportant newsgroup BS? mike |
m II wrote: -=jd=- wrote: I see absolutely nothing wrong with it at all. In fact, I think it serves as an *excellent* demonstration that "Free Speech" works both ways -AND- that those who proclaim it the loudest seems to be the last to realize that fact! Cry me a river... The email was sent in an expectation of privacy and was a request NOT to bother his employers. A public disclosure of it is about the same as a wire tap on an unknowing person. It stinks. How would you feel if someone close to you lost a job because of some unimportant newsgroup BS? Perhaps you might elaborate on how such a thing could occur. |
dxAce wrote ...
Damn, it must be easier to get someone fired these days than I thought. So, someone contacted Louisville Tech... just what did they say? Bryant posts at RRS? Fire him? I didn't see anything in his posts that would give any employer grounds to fire him. So the debate got "lively" at times. Grounds to fire him? I don't see it. It's not like he was making terrorist threats. |
-=jd=- wrote:
On Thu 17 Jun 2004 11:53:20a, m II wrote in message news:Q7jAc.48510$Ds.9055@clgrps12: -=jd=- wrote: I see absolutely nothing wrong with it at all. In fact, I think it serves as an *excellent* demonstration that "Free Speech" works both ways -AND- that those who proclaim it the loudest seems to be the last to realize that fact! Cry me a river... The email was sent in an expectation of privacy and was a request NOT to bother his employers. And what was N8KDV's repeated (ad-nauseum) public demands in here that the spammer *cease* emailing him? You *honestly* do not have the capacity to see the entire view - only the limited range of a single thread, and then pass judgement based solely on that limited view? Come now! A public disclosure of it is about the same as a wire tap on an unknowing person. It stinks. After the volume of public demands to stop emailing N8KDV, how in the world do you rationalize that MWB had even the *slightest* reasonable and prudent expectation of privacy in further spamming N8KDV? It doesn't stink at all - It smells wonderful! You appear to have a rather limited and skewed sense of what an unauthorized wire-tap is. There is simply *zero* comparison... How would you feel if someone close to you lost a job because of some unimportant newsgroup BS? I would feel sincerely embarrassed for you that you actually fell for that line of BS! You bought into that hook-line-sinker, didn't you? Forgive me for chuckling at your expense. What kind of job exposes you to termination because of a silly flame-war on usenet? One that objects to the use of company resources and time..... .....well you fill in the rest. |
|
"m II" wrote in message news:Q7jAc.48510$Ds.9055@clgrps12... -=jd=- wrote: I see absolutely nothing wrong with it at all. In fact, I think it serves as an *excellent* demonstration that "Free Speech" works both ways -AND- that those who proclaim it the loudest seems to be the last to realize that fact! Cry me a river... The email was sent in an expectation of privacy and was a request NOT to bother his employers. A public disclosure of it is about the same as a wire tap on an unknowing person. It stinks. How would you feel if someone close to you lost a job because of some unimportant newsgroup BS? Yup, ratting to someones employer about some Usenet BS would warrant an ass kicking. Beware people, what comes around goes around. |
"-=jd=-" wrote in message ... On Wed 16 Jun 2004 10:24:25p, dxAce wrote in message : Personally, I'm growing tired of the Fat Boy's antics. By the way, he works at: http://www.louisvilletech.com/conten...=&siteid=&app= Steve Holland, MI Drake R7, R8 and R8B http://www.iserv.net/~n8kdv/dxpage.htm I had strong suspicions that the foot-prints up and down MWB's back were your size... Bryant needs to learn that freedom-of-speech works both ways. If he wants to leverage his right to free speech in an unethical manner, then he (by default) agrees to be called on it and have that speech attributed (correctly and properly) directly to himself. Shame on him and anyone who defends or agrees with MWB's behavior & tactics. If they want to blame someone, thay can look squarely at MWB... What a load of crap. |
"LW" wrote in message om... ocom (Michael Bryant) wrote ... Gone, Awwwww don't go professor. You post some good SWL catches. And we need a token kommie-krat to kick around sometimes. So stick around. Right guys? Agreed. Though I don't blame him if he leaves. We need to find the dirtbag who ratted to his employer. |
"-=jd=-" wrote in message ... What kind of job exposes you to termination because of a silly flame-war on usenet? Most of them if your posting from work. |
Right; - Stick around., MW
No one agreees with everyone all the time; But you do post good catches and at the end of the day You'se Good People; - In article , (LW) writes: Subject: My Last Post to RRS From: (LW) Date: 17 Jun 2004 11:26:09 -0700 (Michael Bryant) wrote ... Gone, Awwwww don't go professor. You post some good SWL catches. And we need a token kommie-krat to kick around sometimes. So stick around. Right guys? |
"-=jd=-" wrote in message ... On Thu 17 Jun 2004 02:26:21p, "MnMikew" wrote in message : "m II" wrote in message news:Q7jAc.48510$Ds.9055@clgrps12... -=jd=- wrote: I see absolutely nothing wrong with it at all. In fact, I think it serves as an *excellent* demonstration that "Free Speech" works both ways -AND- that those who proclaim it the loudest seems to be the last to realize that fact! Cry me a river... The email was sent in an expectation of privacy and was a request NOT to bother his employers. A public disclosure of it is about the same as a wire tap on an unknowing person. It stinks. How would you feel if someone close to you lost a job because of some unimportant newsgroup BS? Yup, ratting to someones employer about some Usenet BS would warrant an ass kicking. Beware people, what comes around goes around. You might want to get someone to help you extract that hook from your jaw... You may want to extract your head from your butt. Whether its true or not what happened to Bryant, ratting to an employer is as low as you can go. |
"-=jd=-" wrote in message ... On Thu 17 Jun 2004 02:41:37p, "MnMikew" wrote in message : "-=jd=-" wrote in message ... What kind of job exposes you to termination because of a silly flame-war on usenet? Most of them if your posting from work. See my other post regarding "University" jobs... I doubt they're any different. |
-=jd=- wrote: On Thu 17 Jun 2004 03:20:49p, "MnMikew" wrote in message : "-=jd=-" wrote in message ... On Thu 17 Jun 2004 02:41:37p, "MnMikew" wrote in message : "-=jd=-" wrote in message ... What kind of job exposes you to termination because of a silly flame-war on usenet? Most of them if your posting from work. See my other post regarding "University" jobs... I doubt they're any different. You should check it out - Don't just take my word for it. Every university system that I've heard about, either through a friend who attended or through one of the projects I've worked on, is *very* liberal with connections to the commodity internet. The only restrictions I've seen is to manage bandwidth to certain nodes. I have yet to see or hear of *any* censorship or similar usage restrictions on any *statutorily legal* content. If MWB suffered *any* sanction via his University employer, it's a fairly safe bet it wasn't due to his on-line activites, unless they were patently illegal (ie kiddie-porn). I doubt very seriously he was involved with that type of activity. I actually don't think *anything* has happened to him as he has been so prone to deception, diversion and misleading tactics in the past that I have no rational reason to believe that he's not playing each and every one of you for a fool now. If you want to buy into his load of tripe, by all means go ahead - I have no problem with it. What I *do* have a problem with is when you cop an attitude when I horse-laugh you for falling for it. I know this is just usenet, but "get real"... I just called the Louisville Tech 800 number and the woman I spoke to told me he was still employed there. She then directed me to his voice mail (I did not leave a message). Just another darn interesting day! |
"-=jd=-" wrote in message ... On Thu 17 Jun 2004 03:20:49p, "MnMikew" wrote in message : "-=jd=-" wrote in message ... On Thu 17 Jun 2004 02:41:37p, "MnMikew" wrote in message : "-=jd=-" wrote in message ... What kind of job exposes you to termination because of a silly flame-war on usenet? Most of them if your posting from work. See my other post regarding "University" jobs... I doubt they're any different. You should check it out - Don't just take my word for it. Every university system that I've heard about, either through a friend who attended or through one of the projects I've worked on, is *very* liberal with connections to the commodity internet. The only restrictions I've seen is to manage bandwidth to certain nodes. I have yet to see or hear of *any* censorship or similar usage restrictions on any *statutorily legal* content. If MWB suffered *any* sanction via his University employer, it's a fairly safe bet it wasn't due to his on-line activites, unless they were patently illegal (ie kiddie-porn). I doubt very seriously he was involved with that type of activity. I actually don't think *anything* has happened to him as he has been so prone to deception, diversion and misleading tactics in the past that I have no rational reason to believe that he's not playing each and every one of you for a fool now. If you want to buy into his load of tripe, by all means go ahead - I have no problem with it. What I *do* have a problem with is when you cop an attitude when I horse-laugh you for falling for it. I know this is just usenet, but "get real"... Yes we may never know the real truth. But unless you can prove otherwise, the laugh may be on you. |
"-=jd=-" wrote in message ... On Thu 17 Jun 2004 03:19:14p, "MnMikew" wrote in message : "-=jd=-" wrote in message ... On Thu 17 Jun 2004 02:26:21p, "MnMikew" wrote in message : "m II" wrote in message news:Q7jAc.48510$Ds.9055@clgrps12... -=jd=- wrote: I see absolutely nothing wrong with it at all. In fact, I think it serves as an *excellent* demonstration that "Free Speech" works both ways -AND- that those who proclaim it the loudest seems to be the last to realize that fact! Cry me a river... The email was sent in an expectation of privacy and was a request NOT to bother his employers. A public disclosure of it is about the same as a wire tap on an unknowing person. It stinks. How would you feel if someone close to you lost a job because of some unimportant newsgroup BS? Yup, ratting to someones employer about some Usenet BS would warrant an ass kicking. Beware people, what comes around goes around. You might want to get someone to help you extract that hook from your jaw... You may want to extract your head from your butt. Whether its true or not what happened to Bryant, ratting to an employer is as low as you can go. You said, "Whether it is true or not..." You appear ready, able and more than willing to bitch, moan and complain and *pass judgement* - even if it is *untrue*? Is that what you are saying? Pardon me while I release some stifled "guffaws" at your expense? Do you not agree that getting someone in trouble with their employer is very low behavior? Should be any easy question. |
"MnMikew" wrote ...
We need to find the dirtbag who ratted to his employer. What's to rat? He wasn't doing anything criminal. Why would the employer care? |
"-=jd=-" wrote in message ... On Thu 17 Jun 2004 05:01:25p, dxAce wrote in message : -=jd=- wrote: On Thu 17 Jun 2004 03:20:49p, "MnMikew" wrote in message : "-=jd=-" wrote in message ... On Thu 17 Jun 2004 02:41:37p, "MnMikew" wrote in message : "-=jd=-" wrote in message ... What kind of job exposes you to termination because of a silly flame-war on usenet? Most of them if your posting from work. See my other post regarding "University" jobs... I doubt they're any different. You should check it out - Don't just take my word for it. Every university system that I've heard about, either through a friend who attended or through one of the projects I've worked on, is *very* liberal with connections to the commodity internet. The only restrictions I've seen is to manage bandwidth to certain nodes. I have yet to see or hear of *any* censorship or similar usage restrictions on any *statutorily legal* content. If MWB suffered *any* sanction via his University employer, it's a fairly safe bet it wasn't due to his on-line activites, unless they were patently illegal (ie kiddie-porn). I doubt very seriously he was involved with that type of activity. I actually don't think *anything* has happened to him as he has been so prone to deception, diversion and misleading tactics in the past that I have no rational reason to believe that he's not playing each and every one of you for a fool now. If you want to buy into his load of tripe, by all means go ahead - I have no problem with it. What I *do* have a problem with is when you cop an attitude when I horse-laugh you for falling for it. I know this is just usenet, but "get real"... I just called the Louisville Tech 800 number and the woman I spoke to told me he was still employed there. She then directed me to his voice mail (I did not leave a message). Just another darn interesting day! Hilarious too, when you count all of his kindred souls falling for his ruse... Perhaps we're being duped. He probably got called on the carpet at the most. Still, leave peoples family and employer out of Usenet, PERIOD! |
"LW" wrote in message om... "MnMikew" wrote ... We need to find the dirtbag who ratted to his employer. What's to rat? He wasn't doing anything criminal. Why would the employer care? If he were posting on Co. time perhaps. Then again, it could all be a farce. |
"-=jd=-" wrote in message ... | On Thu 17 Jun 2004 01:25:56a, m II wrote in | message news:EX9Ac.48481$Ds.15572@clgrps12: | | dxAce wrote: | | Here is the text verbatim... | | | What exactly is wrong with your head? I already know what's wrong | with you ethics. | | If that email is real, your actions are the lowest I've seen on this | newsgroup. Does acting like a scum come naturally to you? | | | | mike | | | I see absolutely nothing wrong with it at all. In fact, I think it serves | as an *excellent* demonstration that "Free Speech" works both ways -AND- | that those who proclaim it the loudest seems to be the last to realize | that fact! | | Cry me a river... | | | -=jd=- Yup. Bryant's post calling for the shooting of conservatives was, in my own opinion, lower than low, and indicative of serious underlying problems. -- Steve Lawrence KAØPMD Burnsville, Minnesota (NOTE: My email address has only one "dot." You'll have to edit out the one between the "7" and the "3" in my email address if you wish to reply via email) --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.688 / Virus Database: 449 - Release Date: 5/18/04 |
"Stephen M.H. Lawrence" wrote ...
Yup. Bryant's post calling for the shooting of conservatives was, in my own opinion, lower than low, and indicative of serious underlying problems. Don't guess I saw that one, Bro. Lawrence. Sure is odd - you'd think liberals would celebrate diversity and stuff. Now you tell me he wants me shot because I'm diverse from him. Woe is me. But I'll be stickin' to my right wing Republican, Orthodox Reformed Bible-Thumpin' Presbyterian ways. And if the liberals want me shot, then they can just shoot me. As long as it's done to promote diversity. |
It's more likely that he either A: got busted smoking pot again or B: got
tired of his argumentative attitude and general dishonesty. "-=jd=-" wrote in message Bull****! I call Bull****! If you expect anyone to believe that you lost your job due to usenet posts, you are more pathetic than I would have *ever* imagined. Anyone who buy's into this BS tear-jerk tale deserves the horse-laughing they will get. -=jd=- -- My Current Disposable Email: (Remove YOUR HAT to reply directly) |
|
"Michael Bryant" wrote in message ... | From: (LW) | | "Stephen M.H. Lawrence" wrote ... | | | Yup. Bryant's post calling for the shooting of conservatives was, in my | own | opinion, lower than low, and indicative of serious underlying problems. | | | Don't guess I saw that one, Bro. Lawrence. Sure is odd - you'd think | liberals would celebrate diversity and stuff. Now you tell me he | wants me shot because I'm diverse from him. | | | I was responding to a right-wing conservative who said pochers should be shot | on sight without a trial. I was attempting to show him how stupid that line | was. Little did I think that all the neocons in the NG would take the joke out | of context. Their humor is unidirectional. I thought you quit the group, Brybaby. You're even worse than Lloyd Davies - you thrive on lies, don't you? -- Steve Lawrence KAØPMD Burnsville, Minnesota (NOTE: My email address has only one "dot." You'll have to edit out the one between the "7" and the "3" in my email address if you wish to reply via email) --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.688 / Virus Database: 449 - Release Date: 5/18/04 |
|
"LW" wrote in message m... | ocom (Michael Bryant) wrote ... | | | I was responding to a right-wing conservative who said pochers should be shot | on sight without a trial. I was attempting to show him how stupid that line | was. Little did I think that all the neocons in the NG would take the joke out | of context. Their humor is unidirectional. | | | Thanx for the clarfication. | | Now to balance the reporting, let's hear from a *left wing* | conservative on the matter. | | Bush-Cheney 04. | | Rumsfeld-Rice 08. | | ( Take it, Bro. Lawrence ! ! ! ) Right you are, Brother El Dubyah! (and, for what it's worth, an ultraliberal like Brybaby talking about humor is really the definition of "irony." But I digress!) WWRRD? (What Would Ronald Reagan Do?) Come to think of it, what would John Wayne do? Naww, what would MICHAEL SAVAGE do? He's threatening to run for political office tonight? Hmmm...hey, here's one: What would PROFIT STAIR DO? Now, there's the answer. I bet he could come up with a false prediction, and make everything "all right." Profit Stair for President in 2012! I'm telling you, I think I'm onto a great idea. Not even Hitlery Rotten Clinton could stop Profit Stair - he'd steamroller her and her nag gang like a "Thundarberd" running over fresh baloney! What do you think of *them* apples, Brother El Dubyah? 73, -- Steve Lawrence KAØPMD Burnsville, Minnesota (NOTE: My email address has only one "dot." You'll have to edit out the one between the "7" and the "3" in my email address if you wish to reply via email) --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.688 / Virus Database: 449 - Release Date: 5/18/04 |
"Stephen M.H. Lawrence" wrote ...
What do you think of *them* apples, Brother El Dubyah? Well I hafta admit the Rumsfeld-Rice thing wasn't original - I "seen" it soaped on the back "winder" of a camper cover on a pick-em-up-truck in the flea market at Dayton Hamfest d'other week. The only one I've heard that rings nicer is Kerry-Sharpton '04. Gotta love that one. It'll have every Kommie-Krat south of Pittsburgh voting for Dubyah. Diversity, ya' know. A good show if bi-partisanship, don'tcha see. Now if Hillary was to get elected in '08, I'm sure Billy-Bob would be glad to interview the interns so she could turn to the nation's more pressing issues. Like cattle futures and pharmaceutical stocks. Yeah - Hillary and Janet might be a good ticket for the Kommie-Krats in '08. Maybe have profit Stair for White House chaplain. |
Michael Bryant wrote: From: dxAce Here is the text verbatim... Steve, I can only assume that you did that because you assume I'm Curmudgeon. Guess what? I'm not. Really. I think that his complaints to your newsgroup provider were wrong and reprehensible. His constant harassment of your was hypocritical and probably from someone that was attempting to make you go off on on me. Thus, the "puppet" language. I don't even know how to fake IP addresses. Steve, you've cost me my job. Maybe you didn't do it, but someone did using the address you posted. I don't know what to say. I'm sorry for my involvement in making this such a super-heated situation. I'm due to go to the hospital for surgery in just an hour or so, and this has not helped. This has left me without the means to support my family. OK, if you were due to go to the hospital for surgery in just an hour or so (posted at 7:07 AM), why is it that about an hour and a half later you are on the phone with me? Then at 11:40 AM you are posting again? Pretty quick surgery. More puzzles. |
"MnMikew" wrote in message ... "-=jd=-" wrote in message ... On Thu 17 Jun 2004 05:01:25p, dxAce wrote in message : -=jd=- wrote: On Thu 17 Jun 2004 03:20:49p, "MnMikew" wrote in message : "-=jd=-" wrote in message ... On Thu 17 Jun 2004 02:41:37p, "MnMikew" wrote in message : "-=jd=-" wrote in message ... What kind of job exposes you to termination because of a silly flame-war on usenet? Most of them if your posting from work. See my other post regarding "University" jobs... I doubt they're any different. You should check it out - Don't just take my word for it. Every university system that I've heard about, either through a friend who attended or through one of the projects I've worked on, is *very* liberal with connections to the commodity internet. The only restrictions I've seen is to manage bandwidth to certain nodes. I have yet to see or hear of *any* censorship or similar usage restrictions on any *statutorily legal* content. If MWB suffered *any* sanction via his University employer, it's a fairly safe bet it wasn't due to his on-line activites, unless they were patently illegal (ie kiddie-porn). I doubt very seriously he was involved with that type of activity. I actually don't think *anything* has happened to him as he has been so prone to deception, diversion and misleading tactics in the past that I have no rational reason to believe that he's not playing each and every one of you for a fool now. If you want to buy into his load of tripe, by all means go ahead - I have no problem with it. What I *do* have a problem with is when you cop an attitude when I horse-laugh you for falling for it. I know this is just usenet, but "get real"... I just called the Louisville Tech 800 number and the woman I spoke to told me he was still employed there. She then directed me to his voice mail (I did not leave a message). Just another darn interesting day! Hilarious too, when you count all of his kindred souls falling for his ruse... Perhaps we're being duped. He probably got called on the carpet at the most. Still, leave peoples family and employer out of Usenet, PERIOD! Damn, you're gullible. -- Stinger |
|
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:28 AM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com