|
Research project: Boy/older male relationships
Apologies are offered for this off topic post, but it is desirable in
this type of research to solicit respondents from widely divergent groups which have no particular interest in the subject being investigated. If you, as a boy, had a willing relationship with a male who was at least three years older, and if that relationship included a sexual component, we invite your participation in this project. This current project only deals with situations that were willing and consensual. Situations which were unwilling or coerced in any way are not dealt with now, but will be considered in future projects. If you wish to contribute to the scientific understanding of the long term effects of willing relationships between boys and older males which included a sexual component, we invite you to go to: http://www.psychrsrch.org/minmogpn.html To those who do not qualify or are not interested in participating, your forbearance is appreciated. |
The "principal investigator" advocates pedophilia.
http://www.neusysinc.com/columnarchive/colm0181.html excerpt: "Author David L. Riegel argues in his book that "Men who sexually pursue young boys are not monsters, but sincere, concerned, loving human beings who simply have a sexual orientation that is neither understood nor accepted by most others." The book apparently has no sexually provocative content, but centers on promoting the idea that consensual, "responsible intergenerational" homosexual relationships are wholesome and should be legally permitted." On Mon, 28 Jun 2004 06:58 am -0600 UTC, None posted: %MM Apologies are offered for this off topic post, but it is desirable in this type of research to solicit respondents from widely divergent groups which have no particular interest in the subject being investigated. If you, as a boy, had a willing relationship with a male who was at least three years older, and if that relationship included a sexual component, we invite your participation in this project. This current project only deals with situations that were willing and consensual. Situations which were unwilling or coerced in any way are not dealt with now, but will be considered in future projects. If you wish to contribute to the scientific understanding of the long term effects of willing relationships between boys and older males which included a sexual component, we invite you to go to: http://www.psychrsrch.org/minmogpn.html To those who do not qualify or are not interested in participating, your forbearance is appreciated. -- - |
None wrote:
Apologies are offered for this off topic post, but it is desirable in this type of research to solicit respondents from widely divergent groups which have no particular interest in the subject being investigated. If you, as a boy, had a willing relationship with a male who was at least three years older, and if that relationship included a sexual component, we invite your participation in this project. This current project only deals with situations that were willing and consensual. Situations which were unwilling or coerced in any way are not dealt with now, but will be considered in future projects. If you wish to contribute to the scientific understanding of the long term effects of willing relationships between boys and older males which included a sexual component, we invite you to go to: http://www.psychrsrch.org/minmogpn.html To those who do not qualify or are not interested in participating, your forbearance is appreciated. Ask Steve Lare. He would be happy to...er.. "fill you in", as it were. |
On Mon, 28 Jun 2004 08:58:16 -0400, None wrote:
Apologies are offered for this off topic post, but it is desirable in this type of research to solicit respondents from widely divergent groups which have no particular interest in the subject being investigated. If you, as a boy, had a willing relationship with a male who was at least three years older, and if that relationship included a sexual component, we invite your participation in this project. This current project only deals with situations that were willing and consensual. Situations which were unwilling or coerced in any way are not dealt with now, but will be considered in future projects. If you wish to contribute to the scientific understanding of the long term effects of willing relationships between boys and older males which included a sexual component, we invite you to go to: http://www.psychrsrch.org/minmogpn.html To those who do not qualify or are not interested in participating, your forbearance is appreciated. Have you contacted Steve Lare? He's been willing since he was a boy. Now that he's an old geezer he's probably more than willing. |
On Mon, 28 Jun 2004 08:58:16 -0400,None wrote:
Apologies are offered for this off topic post, but it is desirable in this type of research to solicit respondents from widely divergent groups which have no particular interest in the subject being investigated. If you, as a boy, had a willing relationship with a male who was at least three years older, and if that relationship included a sexual component, we invite your participation in this project. This current project only deals with situations that were willing and consensual. Situations which were unwilling or coerced in any way are not dealt with now, but will be considered in future projects. If you wish to contribute to the scientific understanding of the long term effects of willing relationships between boys and older males which included a sexual component, we invite you to go to: http://www.psychrsrch.org/minmogpn.html To those who do not qualify or are not interested in participating, your forbearance is appreciated. As soon as I read the subject line Steve Lare popped into my mind. If there is anyone that qualifies for this project it is Lare. |
On Mon, 28 Jun 2004 08:58:16 -0400, None wrote:
Apologies are offered for this off topic post, but it is desirable in this type of research to solicit respondents from widely divergent groups which have no particular interest in the subject being investigated. If you, as a boy, had a willing relationship with a male who was at least three years older, and if that relationship included a sexual component, we invite your participation in this project. This current project only deals with situations that were willing and consensual. Situations which were unwilling or coerced in any way are not dealt with now, but will be considered in future projects. If you wish to contribute to the scientific understanding of the long term effects of willing relationships between boys and older males which included a sexual component, we invite you to go to: http://www.psychrsrch.org/minmogpn.html To those who do not qualify or are not interested in participating, your forbearance is appreciated. As a willing boy and as an older male Steve Lare is supposedly a card carrying NAMBLA member. |
You should get in contact with Steve Lare in this newsgroup. He is our
resident man/boy lover. Apologies are offered for this off topic post, but it is desirable in this type of research to solicit respondents from widely divergent groups which have no particular interest in the subject being investigated. If you, as a boy, had a willing relationship with a male who was at least three years older, and if that relationship included a sexual component, we invite your participation in this project. This current project only deals with situations that were willing and consensual. Situations which were unwilling or coerced in any way are not dealt with now, but will be considered in future projects. If you wish to contribute to the scientific understanding of the long term effects of willing relationships between boys and older males which included a sexual component, we invite you to go to: http://www.psychrsrch.org/minmogpn.html To those who do not qualify or are not interested in participating, your forbearance is appreciated. |
NONE,
"situations that were willing and consensual" You are talking about young-males who are in-fact "Minor Children" {Legally Under Age} who by law can not give consent [.] There Are No 'situations' involving "Minor Children" that you can describe as being "Consensual". Just More Sick Pedophile Propaganda by the Ultra-Liberal Democrats. [ North American Man/Boy Love Association or NAMBLA. ] http://www.angelfire.com/tx/reachme/NAMBLA.html FACTS ABOUT NAMBLA: NAMBLA members think that it is their right to have sex with boys NAMBLA members think that they are loving the boys and not hurting them NAMBLA members are a very serious threat to boys everywhere NAMBLA instructs their members on how to sexually abuse boys and get away with it NAMBLA members try and pass themselves off as gay, they are not, they are Pedophiles NAMBLA was incorporated as Zymurgy, a non profit, in Delaware and Massachusetts NAMBLA members will sexually abuse your boys if given the chance NAMBLA members are located in the United States and other parts of the world NAMBLA members work very hard at hiding who they really are NAMBLA thinks that they are protected by the Constitution, their talk is, their actions are not NAMBLA members find boys to sexually abuse at the park, the library, gamerooms and anywhere boys will be ACLU to Defend NAMBLA a marriage made in HELL ! http://www.operationlookout.org/look...end_nambla.htm The Answer to Pedophiles is One Word "CASTRATION" with a Dull Knife ~ RHF .. .. = = = None wrote in message = = = wsfeed.com... Apologies are offered for this off topic post, but it is desirable in this type of research to solicit respondents from widely divergent groups which have no particular interest in the subject being investigated. If you, as a boy, had a willing relationship with a male who was at least three years older, and if that relationship included a sexual component, we invite your participation in this project. This current project only deals with situations that were willing and consensual. Situations which were unwilling or coerced in any way are not dealt with now, but will be considered in future projects. If you wish to contribute to the scientific understanding of the long term effects of willing relationships between boys and older males which included a sexual component, we invite you to go to: http://www.psychrsrch.org/minmogpn.html To those who do not qualify or are not interested in participating, your forbearance is appreciated. .. |
Just More Sick Pedophile Propaganda by the Ultra-Liberal Democrats.
Not to interfere with an otherwise enjoyable troll/fish-hooking of RHF, but I didn't see anywhere in the ramble where any political view (beyond a decidedly twisted concept of social order and acceptability) was espoused, liberal or otherwise. RHF, you can post some really helpful SW-related info in here, and usually do, but you've been knee-jerked by this one. I appreciate your love of all things American and wholesome, but come on... NAMBLA members should be dismissed as wierdos at the least, else shot dead at most, but I don't think I've ever read where sexual and mental illness and abnormal social deviation can be cut along political party lines. Whack-jobs exist on all sides of the fence. Linus |
Curmudgeon - Is That You ?
http://www.planetout.com/popcornq/db/getfilm.html?408 http://movies2.nytimes.com/gst/movie...tml?v_id=82322 Interesting list of new Sock Puppets: |-2 coustanis Jun 28, 2004 |-3 Curmudgeon Jun 28, 2004 |-4 Emmerson Bigguns Jun 28, 2004 |-5 Short Wave Jun 28, 2004 |-6 73 2 U Jun 28, 2004 |-7 Grundig Jun 28, 2004 All with the same message focused on one individual. A regular Three-Ring-circus of 'me-too' clowns. ~ RHF .. .. = = = "Grundig" grundig@longdist@nce wrote in message = = = news:cWV2ZXJ5.ce123672115b39e1228e0e46534544e3@10 88460069.nulluser.com... You should get in contact with Steve Lare in this newsgroup. He is our resident man/boy lover. - - - - - S N I P - - - - - To those who do not qualify or are not interested in participating, your forbearance is appreciated. .. |
"GrtPmpkin32" wrote in message ... but I don't think I've ever read where sexual and mental illness and abnormal social deviation can be cut along political party lines. Whack-jobs exist on all sides of the fence. Linus No SWL should be unfamiliar with Tarpey's biography of George HW Bush. The book has been mentioned several times by Alex Jones, and it must be a favorite among the others in the Special Knowledge crowd. Here's one chapter: http://www.tarpley.net/bush21.htm Now I'm concerned. Could the Illinois Republican party be dominated by perverts? Some of our Republicans have been in the news lately. Prosecutor Jim Ryan worked hard to keep an man on death row, despite the confession of a far more credible suspect. Former Governor George Ryan is now under Federal indictment for racketeering. Senate candidate Jack Ryan's ex-wife, actress Jeri Ryan, says her former husband tried to get her to perform public sexual encounters in sex clubs. So, an informal survey of Illinois Republicans named Ryan indicates that blood-thirsty prosecutors and old-fashioned boodlers outnumber weirdos by a 2 to 1 margin. Whew! That's a relief!! Frank Dresser |
|
Did Bill Clinton renounced NAMBLA in 1992 & 1996 - NO !
Geoge "W" Bush Has Renounced NAMBLA For The Evia=l That It Is I'm not arguing with the fact that the political Right is far more vocal in its denouncing of socially/morally unacceptable behaviour, whether I agree with what they consider immoral or not. And I haven't even suggested anywhere that I lean to the Right or the Left in my political doings. I certainly DID write that I find the entire NAMBLA concept to be worthy of a firing squad. Some people are sick *******s who need to be taken out with the trash. All I said was that the immediate labeling of a (probably trolling) post such as this as 'propaganda from the Ultra-Left Democrats' is a knee-jerk, naive thing to do. There are creeps and criminals in every walk of life, regardless of political persuasion. Please - Don't let NAMBLA in the White House ;-{ Hahaha! Come on! A little melodramatic, don't you think? Relax. I'm not 'for' NAMBLA, I'm just against blind dogma that has to pidgeohole all evil (or evia=l) acts as being the sole property of the opposing party. It's irresponsible and foolish, and damages the real search for the real criminals. Linus |
|
"RHF" wrote in message om... = = = (GrtPmpkin32) wrote in message = = = ... Did Bill Clinton renounced NAMBLA in 1992 & 1996 - NO ! Geoge "W" Bush Has Renounced NAMBLA For The Evia=l That It Is I'm not arguing with the fact that the political Right is far more vocal in its denouncing of socially/morally unacceptable behaviour, whether I agree with what they consider immoral or not. And I haven't even suggested anywhere that I lean to the Right or the Left in my political doings. I certainly DID write that I find the entire NAMBLA concept to be worthy of a firing squad. Some people are sick *******s who need to be taken out with the trash. All I said was that the immediate labeling of a (probably trolling) post such as this as 'propaganda from the Ultra-Left Democrats' is a knee-jerk, naive thing to do. There are creeps and criminals in every walk of life, regardless of political persuasion. Please - Don't let NAMBLA in the White House ;-{ Hahaha! Come on! A little melodramatic, don't you think? Relax. I'm not 'for' NAMBLA, I'm just against blind dogma that has to pidgeohole all evil (or evia=l) acts as being the sole property of the opposing party. It's irresponsible and foolish, and damages the real search for the real criminals. Linus . GP32, What I was trying to point out by these statements: - Did Bill Clinton renounced NAMBLA in 1992 & 1996 - NO ! - Did Al Gore renounced NAMBLA in 2000 - NO ! - Has John 'ff' Kerry renounced NAMBLA in 2004 - NO ! The Democrat Party and it's Leaders can come out in favor of 'consenting adults' engaging in Homo-Sexual Sex and so called Gay Marriage (Civil Union). But the Democrat Party and it's Leaders do NOT have the Moral Sense of Decency to Publicly {Openly} Renounce Organizations like NAMBLA and Abuse of Minor Children by Pedophiles. They remain Silent and by their Silence, Condone and Endorse NAMBLA and continued Exploitation of Innocent Children by Sexual Predators. The "First-Step" is for the Leaders of the Democrat Party to Publicly: - Just Say NO to NAMBLA ! - Just Say NO to Pedophiles ! - Just Say NO to the Sexual Predators of Children ! ssi ~ RHF You should do some Googling before making a statement like that.. a great number of anti-pedophile laws were passed during the Clinton administration, including the Jacob Wetterling Act and Megan's Law.. really, it was in all the papers. I think that stands as a pretty good statement that groups like NAMBLA are not approved of. I wouldn't call that silence. |
"RHF" wrote in message om... . GP32, What I was trying to point out by these statements: - Did Bill Clinton renounced NAMBLA in 1992 & 1996 - NO ! - Did Al Gore renounced NAMBLA in 2000 - NO ! - Has John 'ff' Kerry renounced NAMBLA in 2004 - NO ! The Democrat Party and it's Leaders can come out in favor of 'consenting adults' engaging in Homo-Sexual Sex and so called Gay Marriage (Civil Union). But the Democrat Party and it's Leaders do NOT have the Moral Sense of Decency to Publicly {Openly} Renounce Organizations like NAMBLA and Abuse of Minor Children by Pedophiles. They remain Silent and by their Silence, Condone and Endorse NAMBLA and continued Exploitation of Innocent Children by Sexual Predators. Neither party has taken a stand on cannibalism. Does their silence mean they condone cannibalism? Or does it mean they don't even bother wasting time trying to define their position on cannibalism? I don't think there's any need for most politicians to take a stand on NAMBLA, any more than they need to tell us they stand foresquare against crime, they can't stand Osama Bin Laden and they stand at attention at the Flag. But I can understand why some Republicans might want to clear up any pontential misunderstandings about NAMBLA, given the White House scandal of fifteen years ago. A left-wing kook site has archived the front page of the June 29, 1989 edition of the Washington Times: http://www.voxfux.com/features/bush_...p/franklin.htm The "First-Step" is for the Leaders of the Democrat Party to Publicly: - Just Say NO to NAMBLA ! - Just Say NO to Pedophiles ! - Just Say NO to the Sexual Predators of Children ! ssi ~ RHF . Well, I'm with you there. The more time politicians spend talking about the obvious, the less time they have to mess up the country. Frank Dresser |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:39 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com