Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old June 30th 04, 03:21 AM
Brian Denley
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Peter Maus wrote:
SoooOOOOOOoooo, before I make the investment in something like
a Wellbrook active loop, I've been experimenting in magnetic
transfer after MLB and MTA by RF Systems.

At first blush, with first draft of a homemade MTA, I"ve noted
dramatic noise attenuation 9db, with a signal loss of around 3db on
most signals, which my receivers can more than compensate for.



Interesting stuff Peter. Hope you are well!

--
Brian Denley
http://home.comcast.net/~b.denley/index.html


  #2   Report Post  
Old June 30th 04, 04:37 AM
Peter Maus
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Brian Denley wrote:
Peter Maus wrote:
SoooOOOOOOoooo, before I make the investment in something like

a Wellbrook active loop, I've been experimenting in magnetic
transfer after MLB and MTA by RF Systems.

At first blush, with first draft of a homemade MTA, I"ve noted
dramatic noise attenuation 9db, with a signal loss of around 3db on
most signals, which my receivers can more than compensate for.




Interesting stuff Peter. Hope you are well!



Could be a lot worse. Could be in Milwaukee.



As I get things in place, and work through the revisions, I'll
put some audio comparisons together demonstrating the improvements.




  #3   Report Post  
Old June 30th 04, 02:04 PM
Paul Bauer
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Whats wrong with Milwaukee??????????


"Peter Maus" wrote in message
...
Brian Denley wrote:
Peter Maus wrote:
SoooOOOOOOoooo, before I make the investment in something like

a Wellbrook active loop, I've been experimenting in magnetic
transfer after MLB and MTA by RF Systems.

At first blush, with first draft of a homemade MTA, I"ve noted
dramatic noise attenuation 9db, with a signal loss of around 3db on
most signals, which my receivers can more than compensate for.




Interesting stuff Peter. Hope you are well!



Could be a lot worse. Could be in Milwaukee.



As I get things in place, and work through the revisions, I'll
put some audio comparisons together demonstrating the improvements.






  #4   Report Post  
Old June 30th 04, 01:18 PM
Ken Maltz
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I've noticed that the MLB balun does an excellent job at reducing/eliminating
man-made noise. Whatever losses are present are more than compensated for by
the increase in S/N level.

73s
Ken Maltz
Jericho, NY
NRD-535D, NRD-220 Collins R-388, Racal RA6790/GM,
ICOM R71A, ICOM R-7100(x2), AOR AR-8000
Panasonic RF-2200, Sony ICF-7600GR,
Hoka Code3 Gold-Pro, 60' long wire, MLB balun
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Discone antenna plans [email protected] Antenna 13 January 14th 05 11:51 PM
Short STACKED Vertical {Tri-Band} BroomStick Antenna [Was: Wire ant question] RHF Shortwave 0 February 23rd 04 12:59 PM
Understanding Shortwave Radio Listening and Antenna Design and Construction RHF Shortwave 3 February 13th 04 07:16 AM
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? lbbs Shortwave 16 December 13th 03 03:01 PM
Outdoor Antenna and lack of intermod Soliloquy Scanner 11 October 11th 03 01:36 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:32 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017