For a strongly pro-Cuba view see
http://www.granma.cu/ingles/2004/jul...violacion.html

(No comment from me but its useful to read both sides of the arguments I
guess - Mike)

Mike Terry wrote:

For a strongly pro-Cuba view see
http://www.granma.cu/ingles/2004/jul...violacion.html

(No comment from me but its useful to read both sides of the arguments I
guess - Mike)

From the article:

"Effecting transmissions against Cuba from a military plane is one of the
most dangerous actions recommended to President Bush by the so-called
Commission of Assistance for a Free Cuba,"

Yep, giving the Cuban people information their government doesn't approve of is very dangerous - for the Cuban government.

The news on RHC is always a favorite for me.

"Mark S. Holden" wrote in message
...
Mike Terry wrote:

For a strongly pro-Cuba view see
http://www.granma.cu/ingles/2004/jul...violacion.html

(No comment from me but its useful to read both sides of the arguments I
guess - Mike)

From the article:

"Effecting transmissions against Cuba from a military plane is one of the
most dangerous actions recommended to President Bush by the so-called
Commission of Assistance for a Free Cuba,"

Yep, giving the Cuban people information their government doesn't approve
of is very dangerous - for the Cuban government.

The news on RHC is always a favorite for me.

Gee, what would happen if the American people got information their
government didn't approve of?

In article . net,
"LewBob" wrote:

"Mark S. Holden" wrote in message
...
Mike Terry wrote:

For a strongly pro-Cuba view see
http://www.granma.cu/ingles/2004/jul...violacion.html

(No comment from me but its useful to read both sides of the arguments I
guess - Mike)

From the article:

"Effecting transmissions against Cuba from a military plane is one of the
most dangerous actions recommended to President Bush by the so-called
Commission of Assistance for a Free Cuba,"

Yep, giving the Cuban people information their government doesn't approve
of is very dangerous - for the Cuban government.

The news on RHC is always a favorite for me.

Gee, what would happen if the American people got information their
government didn't approve of?

Why all hell would break loose. We better get that UN in here to monitor
the next election don't you think.

Well it sure is a good thing I can't hear stations from other countries
on short wave or read newspapers from around the world either on the
Internet.

But that is the situation for a pimple faced clueless "LewBob."

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

LewBob wrote:
"Mark S. Holden" wrote in message
...

Mike Terry wrote:

For a strongly pro-Cuba view see
http://www.granma.cu/ingles/2004/jul...violacion.html

(No comment from me but its useful to read both sides of the arguments I
guess - Mike)

From the article:

"Effecting transmissions against Cuba from a military plane is one of the
most dangerous actions recommended to President Bush by the so-called
Commission of Assistance for a Free Cuba,"

Yep, giving the Cuban people information their government doesn't approve

of is very dangerous - for the Cuban government.

The news on RHC is always a favorite for me.


Gee, what would happen if the American people got information their
government didn't approve of?



It would be a normal day.

The US media is routinely critical of the government.

Telamon wrote:

In article . net,
"LewBob" wrote:

"Mark S. Holden" wrote in message
...
Mike Terry wrote:

For a strongly pro-Cuba view see
http://www.granma.cu/ingles/2004/jul...violacion.html

(No comment from me but its useful to read both sides of the
arguments I guess - Mike)

From the article:

"Effecting transmissions against Cuba from a military plane is
one of the most dangerous actions recommended to President Bush
by the so-called Commission of Assistance for a Free Cuba,"

Yep, giving the Cuban people information their government doesn't
approve
of is very dangerous - for the Cuban government.

The news on RHC is always a favorite for me.

Gee, what would happen if the American people got information their
government didn't approve of?

Why all hell would break loose. We better get that UN in here to
monitor the next election don't you think.

Well it sure is a good thing I can't hear stations from other
countries on short wave or read newspapers from around the world
either on the Internet.

But that is the situation for a pimple faced clueless "LewBob."

thats why our radio stations always say "thats all the news you need to
hear"

Like the American people aren't fed a steady diet of fake news...


On Thu, 22 Jul 2004 03:28:28 GMT, "LewBob"
wrote:


The news on RHC is always a favorite for me.

Gee, what would happen if the American people got information their
government didn't approve of?

David wrote:

Like the American people aren't fed a steady diet of fake news...

Yes we are... from BS'ers such as yourself...

dxAce