![]() |
There is still no commercially-available equipment for the 902 MHz amateur
band that I am aware of. Using commercially-available equipment is cheating anyway. What does it take to modify PCS cellular phone firmware for digital communication on 902? Is it just a matter of firmware or isn't the RF section able to tune that far out of band? Think of it this way. When you have an FM broadcast antenna and transmitter, it makes quite a difference when switching within the same band from 88 Mhz to 100 Mhz. (only 12 Mhz) Now you want to take something from around 850 Mhz to 902 Mhz (52 Mhz difference) Plus the higher up you go, the more critical the circuitry. Even in the 440 band you are already dealing with microsurgery when using the miniature surface mount components. Besides, working with microwaves is never a good idea. Might as well just take up smoking cigarettes instead. I would play with mercury and use lead paint in my home no problem, but I would not ever build a transmitter and use microwave frequencies. |
Go to http://tx.mb21.co.uk/gallery/ and look at some of their AM/MW sites. Not only do many of them still use those cool T-shaped horizontal wire antennas, but in some shots you can see sheep grazing in the fields very close by. The RF foes in the USA should consult with veterinarians in the UK and see what their research comes up with GTT Truth wrote: Yes, but researchers can also sift through 80 years of public health records. The people who have, or had, leukemia are known. It shouldn't be hard to find out who lived near a radio transmitter and for how long. It might be interesting to ask veterinarians about animal leukemia, since many transmitters are located in rural areas. (snip) |
"Truth" wrote in message ... On the other hand, the FM signal is radiated from an antenna atop the tower. Stand at the base of a 300' FM tower, and you're 300' from the thing that radiates. This is the same theory in which people claim using their cell phones are safe, because the power they put out is so low. They are powerful enough to transmit to cell towers miles away! and that proves? ... nothing Now put that power inches from your head and how more concentrated is that power? why not look it up? you will find that a 5 watt transmitter operating on 450 MHz with a 1/4 wave antenna might produce enough heating to damage the cornea of the eye IF the tip is placed within one CM of the eye. |
"Truth" wrote in message ... On the other hand, the FM signal is radiated from an antenna atop the tower. Stand at the base of a 300' FM tower, and you're 300' from the thing that radiates. This is the same theory in which people claim using their cell phones are safe, because the power they put out is so low. They are powerful enough to transmit to cell towers miles away! Now put that power inches from your head and how more concentrated is that power? |
In rec.radio.shortwave Truth wrote:
I don't doubt that high levels of RF can be dangerous. The first two chief engineers I worked with both died of cancer in their 50s. Wouldn't FM broadcast antennas be an even greater concern? The height of most adults would make them resonant somewhere near, or in, the FM broadcast band. Comparing wavelengths of "people" based on their height is ridiculous. Microwaves are a much shorter wavelength and cause much more damage to the human body, so the wavelength of people based on their height theory needs to be thrown out right away. To oversimplify a bit: Low frequencies (like AM broadcast) pass through the body without being absorbed. Microwave frequencies bounce off the body without being absorbed. It's the frequency range between 30 and 300 MHz where maximum absorption takes place. Art H. |
"Truth" wrote in message ... There is still no commercially-available equipment for the 902 MHz amateur band that I am aware of. Using commercially-available equipment is cheating anyway. What does it take to modify PCS cellular phone firmware for digital communication on 902? Is it just a matter of firmware or isn't the RF section able to tune that far out of band? Think of it this way. When you have an FM broadcast antenna and transmitter, it makes quite a difference when switching within the same band from 88 Mhz to 100 Mhz. (only 12 Mhz) Now you want to take something from around 850 Mhz to 902 Mhz (52 Mhz difference) yes but 88 to 100 = 12 percent of final freq 850 to 902 is only 5.765 per cent Plus the higher up you go, the more critical the circuitry. Even in the 440 band you are already dealing with microsurgery when using the miniature surface mount components. Besides, working with microwaves is never a good idea. Might as well just take up smoking cigarettes instead. I would play with mercury and use lead paint in my home no problem, but I would not ever build a transmitter and use microwave frequencies. |
"Truth" wrote in message ... There is still no commercially-available equipment for the 902 MHz amateur band that I am aware of. Using commercially-available equipment is cheating anyway. What does it take to modify PCS cellular phone firmware for digital communication on 902? Is it just a matter of firmware or isn't the RF section able to tune that far out of band? Think of it this way. When you have an FM broadcast antenna and transmitter, it makes quite a difference when switching within the same band from 88 Mhz to 100 Mhz. (only 12 Mhz) Now you want to take something from around 850 Mhz to 902 Mhz (52 Mhz difference) Plus the higher up you go, the more critical the circuitry. Even in the 440 band you are already dealing with microsurgery when using the miniature surface mount components. pretty might the same for all hand held electronics these days Besides, working with microwaves is never a good idea. everyone has to have a hobby... 900 MHz are NOT microwaves (we call it microwave in brroadcast, but it is a slang term for high UHF) Might as well just take up smoking cigarettes instead. I would play with mercury and use lead paint in my home no problem, but I would not ever build a transmitter and use microwave frequencies. gunplexers are friendly... bi-directional line-of-sight audio |
Using commercially-available equipment is cheating anyway. What does it take to modify PCS cellular phone firmware for digital communication on 902? Is it just a matter of firmware or isn't the RF section able to tune that far out of band? At the time, cell phone equipment was not readily available. |
To oversimplify a bit: Low frequencies (like AM broadcast) pass through
the body without being absorbed. Microwave frequencies bounce off the body without being absorbed. ROTFFL!!! Why not PROVE your ridiculous theory by putting your head into a microwave oven! ........yeah. I didn't think so. |
Within these hallowed halls, Truth of added the
following to the collective conscience: To oversimplify a bit: Low frequencies (like AM broadcast) pass through the body without being absorbed. Microwave frequencies bounce off the body without being absorbed. ROTFFL!!! Why not PROVE your ridiculous theory by putting your head into a microwave oven! .......yeah. I didn't think so. I was actually wondering what this post of yours had to do with broadcasting. Even if it was off topic but informative or entertaining, it would have been better than just being a post about being rude to someone. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:00 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com