Sir Circumference wrote:
Stereophile22 wrote:
someone else wrote:
Remember "Radar Ranges"?

I don't remember the ""radar ranges". although I'm sure thre was such stufff.

I remeber very well the "Amana Radar Range" being advertised on TV.

No, you remember the Amana Radarange being advertised.

--
"The Democrats are all over this. Democratic strategists feel John Kerry's
war record means he can beat Bush. They say when it comes down to it, voters
will always vote for a war hero over someone who tried to get out of the war.
I'll be sure to mention that to Bob Dole when I see him." -- Jay Leno

Tim Perry wrote:
since the dawn if time he earth has been drenched in radio waves and
radiation. since the advent of electromagnetic telecommunications and power
grid distribution mans lifespan has dramatically increased. therefore radio
waves are good for you.

By that reasoning, so are carbon dioxide and feces.

--
"The Democrats are all over this. Democratic strategists feel John Kerry's
war record means he can beat Bush. They say when it comes down to it, voters
will always vote for a war hero over someone who tried to get out of the war.
I'll be sure to mention that to Bob Dole when I see him." -- Jay Leno

Truth wrote:

To oversimplify a bit: Low frequencies (like AM broadcast) pass through
the body without being absorbed. Microwave frequencies bounce off the body
without being absorbed.


ROTFFL!!!

Why not PROVE your ridiculous theory by putting your head into a microwave oven!

.......yeah. I didn't think so.


.....or by leaning against a 50,000 watt AM antenna while standing on the
ground.

Tim Perry wrote:

"Truth" wrote in message ...

There is still no commercially-available equipment for the 902 MHz

amateur

band that I am aware of.

Using commercially-available equipment is cheating anyway. What does it
take to modify PCS cellular phone firmware for digital communication on
902? Is it just a matter of firmware or isn't the RF section able to

tune

that far out of band?

Think of it this way. When you have an FM broadcast antenna and

transmitter, it

makes quite a difference when switching within the same band from 88 Mhz

to 100

Mhz. (only 12 Mhz)

Now you want to take something from around 850 Mhz to 902 Mhz (52 Mhz
difference)

Plus the higher up you go, the more critical the circuitry. Even in

the 440

band you are already dealing with microsurgery when using the miniature

surface

mount components.


pretty might the same for all hand held electronics these days


Besides, working with microwaves is never a good idea.


everyone has to have a hobby... 900 MHz are NOT microwaves (we call it
microwave in brroadcast, but it is a slang term for high UHF)

Might as well just take

up smoking cigarettes instead.

I would play with mercury and use lead paint in my home no problem, but I

would

not ever build a transmitter and use microwave frequencies.



gunplexers are friendly... bi-directional line-of-sight audio




How did a disussion about AM radio (later microwave RF) change to audio?

Sir Circumference wrote:
Is AM Radio Harmful? Only if you listen to it.

Oh, yeah? Try dropping a Satellite 800 on your foot.

--
"The Democrats are all over this. Democratic strategists feel John Kerry's
war record means he can beat Bush. They say when it comes down to it, voters
will always vote for a war hero over someone who tried to get out of the war.
I'll be sure to mention that to Bob Dole when I see him." -- Jay Leno

clifto wrote:

Sir Circumference wrote:

Stereophile22 wrote:

someone else wrote:

Remember "Radar Ranges"?

I don't remember the ""radar ranges". although I'm sure thre was such stufff.

I remeber very well the "Amana Radar Range" being advertised on TV.


No, you remember the Amana Radarange being advertised.

Correction duly noted.

On 8 Sep 2004 19:00:59 GMT, clifto wrote:

Tim Perry wrote:
since the dawn if time he earth has been drenched in radio waves and
radiation. since the advent of electromagnetic telecommunications and power
grid distribution mans lifespan has dramatically increased. therefore radio
waves are good for you.

By that reasoning, so are carbon dioxide and feces.

No carbon dioxide, no plants, little oxygen.

No feces, little agriculture. Well, some places anyway. :-)

OTOH, no feces, very few politicians.

"clifto" wrote in message
...
Tim Perry wrote:
since the dawn if time he earth has been drenched in radio waves and
radiation. since the advent of electromagnetic telecommunications and
power
grid distribution mans lifespan has dramatically increased. therefore
radio
waves are good for you.

By that reasoning, so are carbon dioxide and feces.


by George i think hes got it!


consider: CO2 is necessary for tree/plant life. human/animal waste products
enrich the soil, which aids plant growth. which provides healthy food, which
gives us humans more time to build and operate radio stations for the
enjoyment of the multitudes. the more people the more the cume and TSL
therefore the more cash flow and life is wonderful.

searching back trying to find who added all these freaking cross posts...
this thread just started out in
alt.radio,alt.radio.broadcasting

"clifto" wrote in message
...
Tim Perry wrote:
since the dawn if time he earth has been drenched in radio waves and
radiation. since the advent of electromagnetic telecommunications and
power
grid distribution mans lifespan has dramatically increased. therefore
radio
waves are good for you.

By that reasoning, so are carbon dioxide and feces.


Read what he was replying to. That's his point. The reasoning doesn't hold
water.

--
McWebber
"Richter points to the lack of legal action against his company as proof
that he's operating appropriately."
Information Week, November 10, 2003