Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old August 25th 04, 11:17 PM
Truth
 
Posts: n/a
Default

There is still no commercially-available equipment for the 902 MHz amateur
band that I am aware of.


Using commercially-available equipment is cheating anyway. What does it
take to modify PCS cellular phone firmware for digital communication on
902? Is it just a matter of firmware or isn't the RF section able to tune
that far out of band?


Think of it this way. When you have an FM broadcast antenna and transmitter, it
makes quite a difference when switching within the same band from 88 Mhz to 100
Mhz. (only 12 Mhz)

Now you want to take something from around 850 Mhz to 902 Mhz (52 Mhz
difference)

Plus the higher up you go, the more critical the circuitry. Even in the 440
band you are already dealing with microsurgery when using the miniature surface
mount components.

Besides, working with microwaves is never a good idea. Might as well just take
up smoking cigarettes instead.

I would play with mercury and use lead paint in my home no problem, but I would
not ever build a transmitter and use microwave frequencies.


  #2   Report Post  
Old August 27th 04, 02:44 AM
TranSurgeon
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Truth" wrote in message ...
There is still no commercially-available equipment for the 902 MHz

amateur
band that I am aware of.


Using commercially-available equipment is cheating anyway. What does it
take to modify PCS cellular phone firmware for digital communication on
902? Is it just a matter of firmware or isn't the RF section able to

tune
that far out of band?


Think of it this way. When you have an FM broadcast antenna and

transmitter, it
makes quite a difference when switching within the same band from 88 Mhz

to 100
Mhz. (only 12 Mhz)

Now you want to take something from around 850 Mhz to 902 Mhz (52 Mhz
difference)


yes but 88 to 100 = 12 percent of final freq

850 to 902 is only 5.765 per cent



Plus the higher up you go, the more critical the circuitry. Even in

the 440
band you are already dealing with microsurgery when using the miniature

surface
mount components.

Besides, working with microwaves is never a good idea. Might as well

just take
up smoking cigarettes instead.

I would play with mercury and use lead paint in my home no problem, but I

would
not ever build a transmitter and use microwave frequencies.




  #3   Report Post  
Old August 27th 04, 02:44 AM
Tim Perry
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Truth" wrote in message ...
There is still no commercially-available equipment for the 902 MHz

amateur
band that I am aware of.


Using commercially-available equipment is cheating anyway. What does it
take to modify PCS cellular phone firmware for digital communication on
902? Is it just a matter of firmware or isn't the RF section able to

tune
that far out of band?


Think of it this way. When you have an FM broadcast antenna and

transmitter, it
makes quite a difference when switching within the same band from 88 Mhz

to 100
Mhz. (only 12 Mhz)

Now you want to take something from around 850 Mhz to 902 Mhz (52 Mhz
difference)

Plus the higher up you go, the more critical the circuitry. Even in

the 440
band you are already dealing with microsurgery when using the miniature

surface
mount components.


pretty might the same for all hand held electronics these days


Besides, working with microwaves is never a good idea.


everyone has to have a hobby... 900 MHz are NOT microwaves (we call it
microwave in brroadcast, but it is a slang term for high UHF)

Might as well just take
up smoking cigarettes instead.

I would play with mercury and use lead paint in my home no problem, but I

would
not ever build a transmitter and use microwave frequencies.


gunplexers are friendly... bi-directional line-of-sight audio




  #4   Report Post  
Old September 2nd 04, 10:29 PM
Truth
 
Posts: n/a
Default

900 MHz are NOT microwaves

Interesting. Especially since the older microwave ovens operated on 800 and
900 Mhz.

Why are people who are uneducated in certain subjects always the first to jump
in on a conversation and tell everyone else how they think things really are?



  #5   Report Post  
Old September 4th 04, 04:31 AM
Sir Circumference
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Truth wrote:

900 MHz are NOT microwaves



Interesting. Especially since the older microwave ovens operated on 800 and
900 Mhz.

Why are people who are uneducated in certain subjects always the first to jump
in on a conversation and tell everyone else how they think things really are?



Because they want to appear educated.




  #6   Report Post  
Old September 4th 04, 04:31 AM
Tim Perry
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Truth" wrote in message ...
900 MHz are NOT microwaves


Interesting. Especially since the older microwave ovens operated on 800

and
900 Mhz.

Why are people who are uneducated in certain subjects always the first to

jump
in on a conversation and tell everyone else how they think things really

are?


ref http://www.naval.com/radio-bands.htm


ref
http://chemindustry.intota.com/multi...ve%20frequency

ref http://www.k5rmg.org/A-soup.html

in most definitions microwaves start at 1GHz or 30CM

what frequencies "microwave ovens" use is irrelevant as marketers can pretty
much name anything what they want.




  #7   Report Post  
Old September 5th 04, 10:14 PM
Sir Circumference
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Is AM Radio Harmful? Only if you listen to it.


  #8   Report Post  
Old September 8th 04, 08:01 PM
clifto
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Sir Circumference wrote:
Is AM Radio Harmful? Only if you listen to it.


Oh, yeah? Try dropping a Satellite 800 on your foot.

--
"The Democrats are all over this. Democratic strategists feel John Kerry's
war record means he can beat Bush. They say when it comes down to it, voters
will always vote for a war hero over someone who tried to get out of the war.
I'll be sure to mention that to Bob Dole when I see him." -- Jay Leno

  #9   Report Post  
Old September 5th 04, 11:15 PM
Stereophile22
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Interesting. Especially since the older microwave ovens operated on 800
and
900 Mhz.


I think the confusion here comes from certain articles.

while 900 mhz was considered microwaves, hence the name "microwave ovens" when
they were invented,

most of the articles I read that mentioned the microwave band starting at
around 1 ghz actually say thst microwaves "start at around 1 ghz",

instead of saying that they do start around 1 ghz.

I consider 900 mhz to be "around" 1 ghz.

I think that a lot of people took the word "around" to mean "does".

and then they might have even printed up websites theirselves that say they do
start at 1 ghz.




  #10   Report Post  
Old September 4th 04, 04:31 AM
Bob Haberkost
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Truth" wrote in message ...
900 MHz are NOT microwaves


Interesting. Especially since the older microwave ovens operated on 800 and
900 Mhz.

Why are people who are uneducated in certain subjects always the first to jump
in on a conversation and tell everyone else how they think things really are?


Yeah, why is that?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microwave

(For the non-curious, the paragraph of interest says:

Microwaves, also known as Super High Frequency (SHF) signals, have wavelengths
approximately in the range of 30 cm (1 GHz) to 1 mm (300 GHz).

)
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
If there's nothing that offends you in your community, then you know you're not
living in a free society.
Kim Campbell - ex-Prime Minister of Canada - 2004
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
For direct replies, take out the contents between the hyphens. -Really!-




Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1415 ­ September 24, 2004 Radionews General 0 September 24th 04 05:53 PM
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1402 ­ June 25, 2004 Radionews Policy 1 June 26th 04 02:07 AM
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1400 ­ June 11, 2004 Radionews Dx 0 June 16th 04 08:34 PM
183 English-language HF Broadcasts audible in NE US (30-MAR-04) Albert P. Belle Isle Shortwave 6 April 2nd 04 04:09 PM
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1379 – January 16, 2004 Radionews General 0 January 18th 04 09:34 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:15 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017