Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old August 20th 04, 01:17 AM
Tim Perry
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"R J Carpenter" wrote in message
...

"David Eduardo" wrote in message
...

The thoroughly undocumented cases (no studies of groundwater

contamination,
etc.) was based on the effects of stations with twice the power allowed

in
the US on AMs.

Low levels of AM as experienced in the US would be very different.


While I think this whole thing is just another pseudo-science scare.... It
is NOT true that US stations have much lower field strength on AM. AFAIK,
very few foreign stations are directional at any power. Some US 50 kW
stations have pretty potent ERP in their beam. Not a megawatt, but quite

a
bit nevertheless.


the field strength of AM radio stations is measured in volts (microvolts)
not watts.

the field strength is inversely proportional to the square of the distance.

any study that relates any form of radiation, electromagnetic or otherwise
that does not refer to quantities measurements AND duration of exposure to
some other effect such as Leukemia is worthless.


I'm a lot more worried about teens and others I see wandering around with

a
cell-phone permanently attached less than an inch from their brain.






  #2   Report Post  
Old August 21st 04, 05:23 AM
Greg and Joan
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"R J Carpenter" wrote in message
...

I'm a lot more worried about teens and others I see wandering around with

a
cell-phone permanently attached less than an inch from their brain.


And their retinas as well..... 900 mhz --- I can recall around 20 years
ago (don't get on my case as to whether it was 16 or 22 or 18 years ago) but
the FCC advised the amateur radio community that if you don't do something
to increase your numbers, we're gonna have to start taking your VHF, UHF,
microwave allocations away. This spectrum is too valuable for you to hold
when your numbers are declining and you're not using them anyway.

They (FCC) discussed a codeless "communicator" license. The ARRL countered
with a "Novice Enhancement" program, which satisfied the Morse Code fetish
requirement, and, as it turned out, did not bring the 50,000 new hams
per year into the service as they claimed it would. But anyway, IIRC,
somebody's idea was to allow novices voice privileges on 902 Mhz, and it
was not considered seriously , and one of the reasons cited was safety.


  #3   Report Post  
Old August 19th 04, 03:29 PM
David
 
Posts: n/a
Default

It's not the radiation. It's the hatred.

On 18 Aug 2004 14:15:19 GMT, "lsmyer" wrote:

This is a link to an article investigating leukemia rates in areas near AM
transmitters.

http://www.wired.com/news/medtech/0,1286,64579,00.html

I don't doubt that high levels of RF can be dangerous. The first two chief
engineers I worked with both died of cancer in their 50s.

Maybe they got cancer from some other cause (both smoked), but I still feel
like I'm inside a microwave oven anytime I'm around an AM transmitter site.



  #4   Report Post  
Old August 19th 04, 03:29 PM
Scott Dorsey
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article , lsmyer wrote:

I don't doubt that high levels of RF can be dangerous. The first two chief
engineers I worked with both died of cancer in their 50s.

Maybe they got cancer from some other cause (both smoked), but I still feel
like I'm inside a microwave oven anytime I'm around an AM transmitter site.


These were folks who engaged in common engineering practices like soaking
a rag in carbon tetrachloride to clean PCB oil from failed capacitors out
of transmitter chassis, right? God knows we all did that sort of thing...
--scott
--
"C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."

  #5   Report Post  
Old August 22nd 04, 05:55 PM
For example: John Smith
 
Posts: n/a
Default

The answer to your questions are right here in the FCC's OET56


http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineeri...56/oet56e4.pdf



"lsmyer" wrote in message
...
This is a link to an article investigating leukemia rates in areas near AM
transmitters.

http://www.wired.com/news/medtech/0,1286,64579,00.html

I don't doubt that high levels of RF can be dangerous. The first two chief
engineers I worked with both died of cancer in their 50s.

Maybe they got cancer from some other cause (both smoked), but I still

feel
like I'm inside a microwave oven anytime I'm around an AM transmitter

site.








  #6   Report Post  
Old August 22nd 04, 05:55 PM
Sir Cumference
 
Posts: n/a
Default

lsmyer wrote:

This is a link to an article investigating leukemia rates in areas near AM
transmitters.

http://www.wired.com/news/medtech/0,1286,64579,00.html

I don't doubt that high levels of RF can be dangerous. The first two chief
engineers I worked with both died of cancer in their 50s.

Maybe they got cancer from some other cause (both smoked), but I still feel
like I'm inside a microwave oven anytime I'm around an AM transmitter site.




AM Radio is harmful only if you listen to it.


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1415 ­ September 24, 2004 Radionews General 0 September 24th 04 05:53 PM
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1402 ­ June 25, 2004 Radionews Policy 1 June 26th 04 02:07 AM
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1400 ­ June 11, 2004 Radionews Dx 0 June 16th 04 08:34 PM
183 English-language HF Broadcasts audible in NE US (30-MAR-04) Albert P. Belle Isle Shortwave 6 April 2nd 04 04:09 PM
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1379 – January 16, 2004 Radionews General 0 January 18th 04 09:34 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:30 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017