Cable Cut
 

Fiber Optic cables cut in high desert at 10am (local) and commutation lost,
cell, tele and internet. Came beck up at 3pm.

The first thought that came to my mind was terrorist. We/I'm sure on
edge about this terror thing.

So the "Swift" boat people are telling it like it is. Almost all of the
medal recommendation were doctored up.

Remember,


Vote "RIGHT"
Vote Republican

Burr

Burr wrote:

Fiber Optic cables cut in high desert at 10am (local) and commutation lost,
cell, tele and internet. Came beck up at 3pm.

The first thought that came to my mind was terrorist. We/I'm sure on
edge about this terror thing.

So the "Swift" boat people are telling it like it is. Almost all of the
medal recommendation were doctored up.

Remember,

Vote "RIGHT"
Vote Republican

Right on Cuzz... It would appear that the 'after action reports' were indeed
written by Kerry and are the basis for the medals in question.

Kerry is a liar, and a fraud.

dxAce

A Navy Veteran who will not be voting for Kerry

On Fri, 20 Aug 2004 19:18:27 -0400, dxAce wrote:



Burr wrote:

Fiber Optic cables cut in high desert at 10am (local) and commutation lost,
cell, tele and internet. Came beck up at 3pm.

The first thought that came to my mind was terrorist. We/I'm sure on
edge about this terror thing.

So the "Swift" boat people are telling it like it is. Almost all of the
medal recommendation were doctored up.

Remember,

Vote "RIGHT"
Vote Republican

Right on Cuzz... It would appear that the 'after action reports' were indeed
written by Kerry and are the basis for the medals in question.

Kerry is a liar, and a fraud.

dxAce

A Navy Veteran who will not be voting for Kerry


Vote for me and there will be an antenna on every roof and a tabletop
shortwave radio* in every living room (or room of your choice - this
is a democracy)!

* Drake R8B - that's how I'll keep jobs from going offshore 8-}

Fiber Optic cables cut in high desert at 10am (local) and commutation lost,
cell, tele and internet. Came beck up at 3pm.


1. What the heck are you talking about?
2. Please use a spell checker.

jw
k9rzz

From: "Burr"

So the "Swift" boat people are telling it like it is. Almost all of the
medal recommendation were doctored up.


Actually, only one of those sift boat people was an eyewitness and it seems
that his own medals were based on the same "doctoring up." Today, other
captains that were there say that Kerry is right.

There's tons more believable evidence that Bush was AWOL....

Comparing the two, Kerry comes out on top, because he had the guts to go to VN!

See those doctors, Burr!


Michael Bryant, WA4009SWL
Louisville, KY
R75, S800, RX320, SW77, ICF2010K,
DX398, 7600G, 6800W, RF2200, 7600A,
Degen 1102, GE SRll, Pro-2006, Pro-2010, Pro-76
(remove "nospam" to reply)

From: (J999w)

Fiber Optic cables cut in high desert at 10am (local) and commutation lost,
cell, tele and internet. Came beck up at 3pm.


1. What the heck are you talking about?
2. Please use a spell checker.


Hey, cut Burr some slack! All those terrorist attacks in California have made
him real paranoid....


Michael Bryant, WA4009SWL
Louisville, KY
R75, S800, RX320, SW77, ICF2010K,
DX398, 7600G, 6800W, RF2200, 7600A,
Degen 1102, GE SRll, Pro-2006, Pro-2010, Pro-76
(remove "nospam" to reply)

Michael Bryant wrote:

From: "Burr"

So the "Swift" boat people are telling it like it is. Almost all of the
medal recommendation were doctored up.


Actually, only one of those sift boat people was an eyewitness and it seems
that his own medals were based on the same "doctoring up." Today, other
captains that were there say that Kerry is right.

Only one? Where the hell do you get your information from, Fat Boy?

There's tons more believable evidence that Bush was AWOL....

Really? How so? You sure don't know much about the National Guard, do you? To fat
to serve? (tons...lol) Yeah, I thought so.

Comparing the two, Kerry comes out on top, because he had the guts to go to VN!

See those doctors, Burr!

See that therapist, Fat Boy, soon!

dxAce
A Navy Veteran who will not be voting for John Fraud Kerry.



Michael Bryant, WA4009SWL
Louisville, KY
R75, S800, RX320, SW77, ICF2010K,
DX398, 7600G, 6800W, RF2200, 7600A,
Degen 1102, GE SRll, Pro-2006, Pro-2010, Pro-76
(remove "nospam" to reply)

On 21 Aug 2004 20:24:26 GMT, ospam (Michael Bryant)
wrote:

From: (J999w)

Fiber Optic cables cut in high desert at 10am (local) and commutation lost,
cell, tele and internet. Came beck up at 3pm.


1. What the heck are you talking about?
2. Please use a spell checker.


Hey, cut Burr some slack! All those terrorist attacks in California have made
him real paranoid....


Michael Bryant, WA4009SWL
Louisville, KY
R75, S800, RX320, SW77, ICF2010K,
DX398, 7600G, 6800W, RF2200, 7600A,
Degen 1102, GE SRll, Pro-2006, Pro-2010, Pro-76
(remove "nospam" to reply)

Terrorist attacks in California is not a new thing ......... so far,
most have been 'domestic terrorism' though.

Several power outages in 1999 were due to 'intrusion' into the power
grid as the doomsayers were gearing up for the Y2K nightmare that
wasn't and talk to the SUV dealer who fell prey to the ELF. Yup,
terrorism by the classic definition; though not Al Queda. So, while
your comment was made in jest - there is some merit in having concern
about some things.

There are many prime targets in California (as in many locations) due
to heavy clusetering of high-tech/aerospace companies. I work in an
area bounded by LA International Airport, USAF Space Command,
Raytheon, Boeing, Chevron Refinery a flourinated gas processing plant
and Northrop as well as a power generation facility and the major
sewage treatment plant for LA County. Anti-terror posturing is no
laughing matter when you consider the carnage a few dedicated loons
with explosives could do - especially at the refinery or the gas
facility where if the explosion doesn't get you - the toxic releases
will. To me, the type of facilities listed above would be more
concern than the corner ARCO station .... which I'm not even sure if
Burr meant as a real issue or if he was just getting us going as he
often does 8-}

In article ,
ospam (Michael Bryant) wrote:

From: "Burr"

So the "Swift" boat people are telling it like it is. Almost all of the
medal recommendation were doctored up.


Actually, only one of those sift boat people was an eyewitness and it seems
that his own medals were based on the same "doctoring up." Today, other
captains that were there say that Kerry is right.

There's tons more believable evidence that Bush was AWOL....

Comparing the two, Kerry comes out on top, because he had the guts to go to
VN!

You come out on the bottom due to your inability to "sift" through the
facts.

I guess we will just leave out the apparent embellishment of the Kerry
version of war atrocities to get those medals. Yeah that's coming out on
top all right.

Why yes, apparently, Kerry had the "guts" to commit war atrocities and
that is what whack-job Mikey looks for in a "leader."

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

Telamon wrote:
Why yes, apparently, Kerry had the "guts" to commit war atrocities and
that is what whack-job Mikey looks for in a "leader."

But only a Democrat. If a Republican pours cold water on someone, it's
torture and he should be put to death. But a Democrat who shoots a teenager
in the back and commits war atrocities would make a really good President.

--
"Kerry arrived [in Viet Nam] with a strong anti-Vietnam War bias and a self-
serving determination to build a foundation for his political future."
-- Rear Admiral Roy Hoffmann, USN (Ret.), May 4, 2004

On Sat, 21 Aug 2004 23:11:25 GMT, Telamon
wrote:

I guess we will just leave out the apparent embellishment of the Kerry
version of war atrocities to get those medals. Yeah that's coming out on
top all right.

I don't think Kerry gave the medals to himself. Blame his damn
officers or the system.

In article ,
clifto wrote:

Telamon wrote:
Why yes, apparently, Kerry had the "guts" to commit war atrocities and
that is what whack-job Mikey looks for in a "leader."

But only a Democrat. If a Republican pours cold water on someone, it's
torture and he should be put to death. But a Democrat who shoots a teenager
in the back and commits war atrocities would make a really good President.

The problem I have with this Presidential campaign is that when the
media, Michael Moor or some harebrained celebrity slams Bush you do not
hear a peep out of Kerry, but now that a group of disgruntled Veterans,
that served with him, go after Kerry's Nam record he calls for Bush to
stop it. Typical elitist thinking whereby Kerry wants all the pluses
that go with something but none of the negatives is suppose to touch
him. The negatives are for other people to deal with.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

"William H. Everhart III" wrote:

On Sat, 21 Aug 2004 23:11:25 GMT, Telamon
wrote:

I guess we will just leave out the apparent embellishment of the Kerry
version of war atrocities to get those medals. Yeah that's coming out on
top all right.

I don't think Kerry gave the medals to himself. Blame his damn
officers or the system.

Sure he did, if he wrote up fictitious action reports. Officers are supposed
to be 'honest'.

But if one is John Forbes Kerry, well heck, he 'deserved' to get those
medals.

One wouldn't want to get in the way, of a future JFK!

dxAce
A Navy Veteran who will not be voting for John Fraud Kerry.

On Sun, 22 Aug 2004 04:52:25 GMT, Telamon
wrote:

In article ,
clifto wrote:

Telamon wrote:
Why yes, apparently, Kerry had the "guts" to commit war atrocities and
that is what whack-job Mikey looks for in a "leader."

But only a Democrat. If a Republican pours cold water on someone, it's
torture and he should be put to death. But a Democrat who shoots a teenager
in the back and commits war atrocities would make a really good President.

The problem I have with this Presidential campaign is that when the
media, Michael Moor or some harebrained celebrity slams Bush you do not
hear a peep out of Kerry, but now that a group of disgruntled Veterans,
that served with him, go after Kerry's Nam record he calls for Bush to
stop it. Typical elitist thinking whereby Kerry wants all the pluses
that go with something but none of the negatives is suppose to touch
him. The negatives are for other people to deal with.

You have a good point.

"William H. Everhart III" wrote in message
...
| On Sat, 21 Aug 2004 23:11:25 GMT, Telamon
| wrote:
|
| I guess we will just leave out the apparent embellishment of the Kerry
| version of war atrocities to get those medals. Yeah that's coming out on
| top all right.
|
| I don't think Kerry gave the medals to himself. Blame his damn
| officers or the system.

Fair enough, consider them blamed.

Now, one question. Okay, two:

1. Where was John Effing Kerrnedy on Christmas Eve and Christmas
Day of 1968? Keep in mind the fact that he says the memory was
"seared" into his mind.

2. Why would anyone vote for a confessed war criminal?

Oh, no, wait, there are three, actually.

3. Are you still choking on your own vomit?

73,

Steve Lawrence
KAØPMD
Burnsville, Minnesota

(NOTE: My email address has only one "dot."
You'll have to edit out the one between the "7"
and the "3" in my email address if you wish to
reply via email)


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.740 / Virus Database: 494 - Release Date: 8/16/04

Burr wrote:
Fiber Optic cables cut in high desert at 10am (local) and commutation lost,
cell, tele and internet. Came beck up at 3pm.

The first thought that came to my mind was terrorist. We/I'm sure on
edge about this terror thing.

So the "Swift" boat people are telling it like it is. Almost all of the
medal recommendation were doctored up.

That's what SOME of the swift boat people are saying. And they have little
or no evidence to back up those claims.

You seem very concerned with terrorists. On whose watch did the terror
attacks occur? Remember that Bush took a 4-week vacation on his ranch the
month before the attacks. He sure didn't seem concerned.

What do "swift boat people" have to do with your fiber optic cables? Or
shortwave?

Art H.

Harris wrote:

Burr wrote:
Fiber Optic cables cut in high desert at 10am (local) and commutation lost,
cell, tele and internet. Came beck up at 3pm.

The first thought that came to my mind was terrorist. We/I'm sure on
edge about this terror thing.

So the "Swift" boat people are telling it like it is. Almost all of the
medal recommendation were doctored up.

That's what SOME of the swift boat people are saying. And they have little
or no evidence to back up those claims.

Better check those facts, Art.

dxAce
A Navy and National Guard Veteran who will not be voting for John Fraud Kerry.

"dxAce" wrote:
Harris wrote:
That's what SOME of the swift boat people are saying. And they have
little
or no evidence to back up those claims.

Better check those facts, Art.

Well clearly, only SOME of the "swift boat people" are criticizing Kerry, so
you must be questioning the part about "little or no evidence." What hard
evidence do you have to support the swift boat people criticizing Kerry? And
why did Bush himself today say that "I think Senator Kerry served admirably
and he ought to be proud of his record."

Art H.

"dxAce" wrote:
Harris wrote:
That's what SOME of the swift boat people are saying. And they have
little
or no evidence to back up those claims.

Better check those facts, Art.

Well clearly, only SOME of the "swift boat people" are criticizing Kerry, so
you must be questioning the part about "little or no evidence." What hard
evidence do you have to support the swift boat people criticizing Kerry? And
why did Bush himself today say that "I think Senator Kerry served admirably
and he ought to be proud of his record."

Art H.

Arthur Harris wrote:

"dxAce" wrote:
Harris wrote:
That's what SOME of the swift boat people are saying. And they have
little
or no evidence to back up those claims.

Better check those facts, Art.

Well clearly, only SOME of the "swift boat people" are criticizing Kerry, so
you must be questioning the part about "little or no evidence." What hard
evidence do you have to support the swift boat people criticizing Kerry? And
why did Bush himself today say that "I think Senator Kerry served admirably
and he ought to be proud of his record."

Because George W. Bush is not a stupid politician, that's why.

dxAce
A Navy and National Guard Veteran who will not be voting for John Fraud Kerry. I
know better.

Send it again, Art!

Arthur Harris wrote:

"dxAce" wrote:
Harris wrote:
That's what SOME of the swift boat people are saying. And they have
little
or no evidence to back up those claims.

Better check those facts, Art.

Well clearly, only SOME of the "swift boat people" are criticizing Kerry, so
you must be questioning the part about "little or no evidence." What hard
evidence do you have to support the swift boat people criticizing Kerry? And
why did Bush himself today say that "I think Senator Kerry served admirably
and he ought to be proud of his record."

Art H.

"dxAce" wrote:
Arthur Harris wrote:

why did Bush himself today say that "I think Senator Kerry served
admirably
and he ought to be proud of his record."

Because George W. Bush is not a stupid politician, that's why.

So either:

1) Bush sincerely believes Kerry served admirably, or
2) Bush is a liar.

Which is it?

Art H.

Arthur Harris wrote:

"dxAce" wrote:
Arthur Harris wrote:

why did Bush himself today say that "I think Senator Kerry served
admirably
and he ought to be proud of his record."

Because George W. Bush is not a stupid politician, that's why.

So either:

1) Bush sincerely believes Kerry served admirably, or
2) Bush is a liar.

Which is it?

LOL... go look at what Kerry said about Edwards during the primaries...

so either...

1. Kerry doesn't think Edwards is very good, or
2. Kerry is a liar.

You're not very bright, are you?

dxAce

dxAce wrote:

Arthur Harris wrote:

So either:

1) Bush sincerely believes Kerry served admirably, or
2) Bush is a liar.

Which is it?

LOL... go look at what Kerry said about Edwards during the primaries...

They were competing for the nomination, and had some differences on some
issues. There were no character attacks.

Art H.

Harris wrote:

dxAce wrote:

Arthur Harris wrote:

So either:

1) Bush sincerely believes Kerry served admirably, or
2) Bush is a liar.

Which is it?

LOL... go look at what Kerry said about Edwards during the primaries...

They were competing for the nomination, and had some differences on some
issues. There were no character attacks.

I guess that depends upon what one would consider a 'character' attack.

Or what the definition of 'is' is.

You Liberal's really crack me up!

dxAce

dxAce wrote:


Harris wrote:

LOL... go look at what Kerry said about Edwards during the primaries...

They were competing for the nomination, and had some differences on some
issues. There were no character attacks.

I guess that depends upon what one would consider a 'character' attack.

Or what the definition of 'is' is.

You Liberal's really crack me up!

Again, you give no specifics. What character attacks did Kerry make
against Edwards? You're the one who raised this issue.

Art H.

Harris wrote:

dxAce wrote:

Harris wrote:

LOL... go look at what Kerry said about Edwards during the primaries...

They were competing for the nomination, and had some differences on some
issues. There were no character attacks.

I guess that depends upon what one would consider a 'character' attack.

Or what the definition of 'is' is.

You Liberal's really crack me up!

Again, you give no specifics. What character attacks did Kerry make
against Edwards? You're the one who raised this issue.

Come on Artie, play along with me..

Did you not state: "No, Bush seems to have an aversion to war when it involves
him being in harms way".

Did I not ask: "What wars you been in Artie? You ever volunteer for any? You ever
serve in the Armed Forces?".

Do you yourself have an aversion to war if it might involve you in harms way?

On the other point, I guess you must have been sleeping during the primaries. You
certainly missed the character attacks by Kerry against Edwards and Edwards
against Kerry.

I'm not surprised that you missed it.

One other thing, Artie, you ever consider changing your callsign? I understand
that those are your initials and all, but don't you feel just a wee bit
uncomfortable when you have say November 2 Ass Hole?

dxAce

dxAce wrote:

Harris wrote:


Again, you give no specifics. What character attacks did Kerry make
against Edwards? You're the one who raised this issue.

I guess you must have been sleeping during the primaries. You
certainly missed the character attacks by Kerry against Edwards and Edwards
against Kerry.

OK, refresh my memory. Cite one or two of those character attacks.

Art H.

Harris wrote:

dxAce wrote:

Harris wrote:


Again, you give no specifics. What character attacks did Kerry make
against Edwards? You're the one who raised this issue.

I guess you must have been sleeping during the primaries. You
certainly missed the character attacks by Kerry against Edwards and Edwards
against Kerry.

OK, refresh my memory. Cite one or two of those character attacks.

Whoa.. you can't go look it up yourself?

It's out there Artie... go look it up. I realise you damn Lib's are pretty lazy,
always wanting someone else to do the work when you're in a hard spot, right?

dxAce



Art H.

"Telamon" wrote:
Harris wrote:

Again, you give no specifics. What character attacks did Kerry make
against Edwards? You're the one who raised this issue.

OK, refresh my memory. Cite one or two of those character attacks.

I seem to recall Kerry calling himself the most liberal Senator and that
Edwards was only #4. Pretty nasty if you ask me.

Nice try. At least you came up with something semi humorous. But your pal
Lare, who made the charge that Kerry and Edwards had traded numerous
character attacks, couldn't produce a single example to back up his claim. I
guess you can't either.

Have a nice day.

Art H.

Arthur Harris wrote:

"Telamon" wrote:
Harris wrote:

Again, you give no specifics. What character attacks did Kerry make
against Edwards? You're the one who raised this issue.

OK, refresh my memory. Cite one or two of those character attacks.

I seem to recall Kerry calling himself the most liberal Senator and that
Edwards was only #4. Pretty nasty if you ask me.

Nice try. At least you came up with something semi humorous. But your pal
Lare, who made the charge that Kerry and Edwards had traded numerous
character attacks, couldn't produce a single example to back up his claim. I
guess you can't either.

Why don't you go look 'em up? It's pretty obvious to me that you were sleeping
during the primaries...

dxAce

"dxAce" wrote:
Arthur Harris wrote:
Nice try. At least you came up with something semi humorous. But your
pal
Lare, who made the charge that Kerry and Edwards had traded numerous
character attacks, couldn't produce a single example to back up his
claim. I
guess you can't either.

Why don't you go look 'em up? It's pretty obvious to me that you were
sleeping
during the primaries...

You're a riot! You're the one who made the charge. Can't you back it up? I'm
saying there were no character attacks between Kerry and Edwards. Come on;
prove me wrong.

Art H.

Arthur Harris wrote:

"dxAce" wrote:
Arthur Harris wrote:
Nice try. At least you came up with something semi humorous. But your
pal
Lare, who made the charge that Kerry and Edwards had traded numerous
character attacks, couldn't produce a single example to back up his
claim. I
guess you can't either.

Why don't you go look 'em up? It's pretty obvious to me that you were
sleeping
during the primaries...

You're a riot! You're the one who made the charge. Can't you back it up? I'm
saying there were no character attacks between Kerry and Edwards.

And yet again, you'd be wrong.

Keep trying, Artie.

dxAce

"dxAce"
Arthur Harris wrote:

You're a riot! You're the one who made the charge. Can't you back it up?
I'm
saying there were no character attacks between Kerry and Edwards.

Nice editing. You left out the part about "come on, prove me wrong."

And yet again, you'd be wrong.

So back up your charge, and prove me wrong. It's pretty obvious by now that
you can't.

Art H.

Arthur Harris wrote:

"dxAce"
Arthur Harris wrote:

You're a riot! You're the one who made the charge. Can't you back it up?
I'm
saying there were no character attacks between Kerry and Edwards.

Nice editing. You left out the part about "come on, prove me wrong."

And yet again, you'd be wrong.

So back up your charge, and prove me wrong. It's pretty obvious by now that
you can't.

It's pretty obvious by now that you're a 'tard, Artie.

dxAce

Harris wrote:
Again, you give no specifics. What character attacks did Kerry make
against Edwards? You're the one who raised this issue.

Kerry said Edwards was in diapers while he was in Viet Nam.

Kerry said Edwards was trying to align himself with a "protectionist
point of view," accusing him of exploiting the trade issue on the
campaign trail. Edwards "has talked more in the last five weeks about
trade than he has in the last five years," Kerry said.

Kerry made it a point to emphasize that Edwards had "far less experience"
in the Senate.

--
If Kerry can't cope with the "Republican Attack Machine",
how can he hope to deal with Al Qaeda?

In article ,
"Arthur Harris" wrote:

"Telamon" wrote:
Harris wrote:

Again, you give no specifics. What character attacks did Kerry make
against Edwards? You're the one who raised this issue.

OK, refresh my memory. Cite one or two of those character attacks.

I seem to recall Kerry calling himself the most liberal Senator and that
Edwards was only #4. Pretty nasty if you ask me.

Nice try. At least you came up with something semi humorous. But your pal
Lare, who made the charge that Kerry and Edwards had traded numerous
character attacks, couldn't produce a single example to back up his claim. I
guess you can't either.

Have a nice day.

Have a nice day yourself. If you want me to educate you then you are
going to have pay in advance.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California