RadioBanter

RadioBanter (https://www.radiobanter.com/)
-   Shortwave (https://www.radiobanter.com/shortwave/)
-   -   OT Dishonest Smear Tactics (https://www.radiobanter.com/shortwave/44105-ot-dishonest-smear-tactics.html)

Michael Bryant August 22nd 04 06:30 PM

OT Dishonest Smear Tactics
 
http://courierjournal.com/cjextra/ed...0822-3637.html





Michael Bryant, WA4009SWL
Louisville, KY
R75, S800, RX320, SW77, ICF2010K,
DX398, 7600G, 6800W, RF2200, 7600A,
Degen 1102, GE SRll, Pro-2006, Pro-2010, Pro-76
(remove "nospam" to reply)

dxAce August 22nd 04 06:44 PM



Michael Bryant wrote:

http://courierjournal.com/cjextra/ed...0822-3637.html


What is really dishonest is the fact that you lied about having a PhD. You also
lied about being fired from Louisville Technical Institute.

You are irrelevant. Your best bet is to hit the road before you get your fat ass
kicked again.

dxAce



Michael Bryant, WA4009SWL
Louisville, KY
R75, S800, RX320, SW77, ICF2010K,
DX398, 7600G, 6800W, RF2200, 7600A,
Degen 1102, GE SRll, Pro-2006, Pro-2010, Pro-76
(remove "nospam" to reply)



T. Early August 22nd 04 06:52 PM


"Michael Bryant" wrote in message
...

http://courierjournal.com/cjextra/ed...0822-3637.html


Speaking of "dishonest smear tactics," I must've missed all of the
editiorials condemning Joseph Wilson and Michael Moore. Happen to
have any links, or is that one of the many inconvenient questions that
never draws a response from you?

Liberal media? What liberal media?






Stephen M.H. Lawrence August 22nd 04 06:53 PM


"Michael Bryant" wrote in message
...
|
http://courierjournal.com/cjextra/ed...0822-3637.html

Cut 'n paste, Brybaby, keep cutting and pasting your hypocrazy;
you are as proficient as Lloyd Davies!

Riddle me this, Brybaby: Where was John Effing Kerrnedy on
Christmas Eve, 1968?

Keep in mind, it's bad form to answer a question with another
question, though I'm sure you'll whinge one or two.

73,

--
Steve Lawrence
KAØPMD
Burnsville, Minnesota

(NOTE: My email address has only one "dot."
You'll have to edit out the one between the "7"
and the "3" in my email address if you wish to
reply via email)


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.740 / Virus Database: 494 - Release Date: 8/16/04



John S. Dyson August 22nd 04 07:51 PM

In article ,
"T. Early" writes:

"Michael Bryant" wrote in message
...

http://courierjournal.com/cjextra/ed...0822-3637.html


Speaking of "dishonest smear tactics," I must've missed all of the
editiorials condemning Joseph Wilson and Michael Moore.

For 'dishonest smear tactics', please refer to the ultimate smear
merchant JF Kerry's claims
during the committee hearings (due to some errors in his smear
tactics, we found that either Kerry is a war criminal or liar.)

Kerry had tried to smear practically the entire military, and
any clear thinking person sees that he is the ultimately
inappropriate person for the presidency or any other high level
government executive office. He is CERTAINLY appropriate for
lower level offices or the legislature... Oddballs and kooks
help round out the legislature.

John


Michael Bryant August 22nd 04 07:59 PM

From: (John S. Dyson)

Kerry had tried to smear practically the entire military, and
any clear thinking person sees that he is the ultimately
inappropriate person for the presidency or any other high level
government executive office. He is CERTAINLY appropriate for
lower level offices or the legislature... Oddballs and kooks
help round out the legislature.


Any clear-thinking individual would agree that many American soldiers did
indeed carry out atrocities in VN. The war was a horrible mistake and resulted
in the largest embarrassment that our military ever faced.

The fact the Kerry called it like it was is one of the reasons I respect him so
much. Nixon tried his best to discredit him and couldn't.


Michael Bryant, WA4009SWL
Louisville, KY
R75, S800, RX320, SW77, ICF2010K,
DX398, 7600G, 6800W, RF2200, 7600A,
Degen 1102, GE SRll, Pro-2006, Pro-2010, Pro-76
(remove "nospam" to reply)

dxAce August 22nd 04 08:04 PM



Michael Bryant wrote:

From: (John S. Dyson)


Kerry had tried to smear practically the entire military, and
any clear thinking person sees that he is the ultimately
inappropriate person for the presidency or any other high level
government executive office. He is CERTAINLY appropriate for
lower level offices or the legislature... Oddballs and kooks
help round out the legislature.


Any clear-thinking individual would agree that...


....You lied about having a PhD, and that you also lied about being fired from
Louisville Technical Institute.

dxAce


Telamon August 22nd 04 08:44 PM

In article ,
ospam (Michael Bryant) wrote:

From:
(John S. Dyson)

Kerry had tried to smear practically the entire military, and
any clear thinking person sees that he is the ultimately
inappropriate person for the presidency or any other high level
government executive office. He is CERTAINLY appropriate for
lower level offices or the legislature... Oddballs and kooks
help round out the legislature.


Any clear-thinking individual


Snip

You have no basis in "clear-thinking."

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

T. Early August 22nd 04 09:02 PM


"Michael Bryant" wrote in message
...

The fact the Kerry called it like it was is one of the reasons I

respect him so
much. Nixon tried his best to discredit him and couldn't.


Well, you seem to have "overlooked" the question in my earlier post in
this thread in your rush to reply to John. Funny how that happens.
However, undaunted, I shall try again with another
soon-to-be-unanswered question. Why would you respect" anyone for
doing something that was simply the politically expedient thing to do
at the time? One of Kerry's obvious strengths as a politician is
sensing which way the wind blows and immediately getting out in front
of it. When he returned from Vietnam with a political career in mind,
he certainly realized that a considerable majority of the opinion
makers in the country were anti-war, and joined them, with his
military service as a ready made podium. Since when is going with the
obvious flow deserving of respect, particularly when one's former
colleagues are still taking fire?



Brian Hill August 22nd 04 09:16 PM


"Michael Bryant" wrote in message


Any clear-thinking individual would agree that many American soldiers did
indeed carry out atrocities in VN.


Michael Bryant, WA4009SWL



And how you going to manage that with a head full of smoke? It boggles the
mind? LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!



--
73 and good DXing.
Brian
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
A lot of radios and 100' of rusty wire!
Zumbrota, Southern MN
Brian's Radio Universe
http://webpages.charter.net/brianhill/





KK4TL August 23rd 04 12:08 AM

ospam (Michael Bryant) wrote ...


Any clear-thinking individual would agree that many American soldiers did
indeed carry out atrocities in VN.


Ok professor. You're on. I'm a clear-thinking individual and I will
NOT agree to your proposal here. How many is "many"? Ok there was My
Lai. Rattle off a few others. And demonstrate your meaning of
"many". A hundred? A thousand? Ten thousand? Granted one is too
many. But how many is "many" ?

The war was a horrible mistake and resulted
in the largest embarrassment that our military ever faced.


Amen and amen, professor. Agreed. No doubt about it. Will we ever
know what precipitated it? Oh yeah .. they told us we were there to
stop communism. Right. It didn't do a lot to stop communism, but a
lot of large corporations made a lot of pesos off the war, didn't
they?

I even heard .. that the Johnson family owned a transport company that
was shipping the war supplies. Yep, Lyndon "I'll go to war myself
before I send someone else's son to war" Johnson. Those Johnsons.

And we thought only republicans were involved in big business and war
mongering.

Proving that GREED is a bi-partisan quality. Yes?

Michael Bryant August 23rd 04 02:15 AM

From: (KK4TL)

(Michael Bryant) wrote ...


Any clear-thinking individual would agree that many American soldiers did
indeed carry out atrocities in VN.


Ok professor. You're on. I'm a clear-thinking individual and I will
NOT agree to your proposal here. How many is "many"? Ok there was My
Lai. Rattle off a few others. And demonstrate your meaning of
"many". A hundred? A thousand? Ten thousand? Granted one is too
many. But how many is "many" ?


Hundreds of different accounts exist regarding the atrocities committed by US
soldiers in VN. Including over 100 "fragging" investigations conducted by the
Pentagon. There's a reason why most VN villagers supported the VC over US
troops.

But, let me be clear: the vast majority of US troops were just kids thrown into
an unwinnable situation. They were not evil. Their leaders let them down.



The war was a horrible mistake and resulted
in the largest embarrassment that our military ever faced.


Amen and amen, professor. Agreed. No doubt about it. Will we ever
know what precipitated it? Oh yeah .. they told us we were there to
stop communism. Right. It didn't do a lot to stop communism, but a
lot of large corporations made a lot of pesos off the war, didn't
they?

I even heard .. that the Johnson family owned a transport company that
was shipping the war supplies. Yep, Lyndon "I'll go to war myself
before I send someone else's son to war" Johnson. Those Johnsons.


Well, gee, when have I ever defended LBJ?
Kennedy, LBJ and Nixon were all deluded and misled by defense advisors.
Kissinger and McNamara were serious offenders.


And we thought only republicans were involved in big business and war
mongering.


Nope. Never said that.


Proving that GREED is a bi-partisan quality. Yes?


Agreed.

Now explain how our agreement disproves that both Republicans and Democrats
made bad decisions in VN.

And you always drift. Even if LBJ and the Demos shared responsibility for VN,
how does that refute anything Kerry had to say about VN.

Kerry spoke the truth. I respect that in someone who I intend to vote for.


Michael Bryant, WA4009SWL
Louisville, KY
R75, S800, RX320, SW77, ICF2010K,
DX398, 7600G, 6800W, RF2200, 7600A,
Degen 1102, GE SRll, Pro-2006, Pro-2010, Pro-76
(remove "nospam" to reply)

nojunk@this_address.com (Mike Pearson August 23rd 04 02:20 AM

KK4TL wrote:

ospam (Michael Bryant) wrote ...


Any clear-thinking individual would agree that many American soldiers did
indeed carry out atrocities in VN.


Ok professor. You're on. I'm a clear-thinking individual and I will
NOT agree to your proposal here. How many is "many"? Ok there was My
Lai. Rattle off a few others. And demonstrate your meaning of
"many". A hundred? A thousand? Ten thousand? Granted one is too
many. But how many is "many" ?


You can start with a quick search for "Tiger Force", or 'Vietnam
+"necklace of ears"':

"Sergeant Forrest Miller told Army investigators the killing of
prisoners was "an unwritten law." Other soldiers said they sought
revenge in the villages after unit members were killed and injured
during sniper and grenade attacks.

Soldiers often cited conflicting views of commanders as a reason they
killed unarmed people. Some commanders told investigators that civilians
could be targeted in certain circumstances; others said they could never
be attacked. During the Army's investigation, 27 soldiers said severing
ears from dead Vietnamese became routine.

"There was a period when just about everyone had a necklace of ears,"
former platoon medic Larry Cottingham told investigators.

The atrocities carried out by the unit came just months before the
killing of about 500 Vietnamese civilians by an Army unit in 1968 at My
Lai."



--
Mike
NAR #70953 - Sr/HPR Level-1 ~ BEMRC - NAR Section #627
NO Junk Email, please! Real email to: amphoto [at] blarg [dot] net.
WANTED: Experienced Kamikaze Pilot

dxAce August 23rd 04 02:22 AM



Michael Bryant wrote:

From: (KK4TL)


(Michael Bryant) wrote ...


Any clear-thinking individual would agree that many American soldiers did
indeed carry out atrocities in VN.


Ok professor. You're on. I'm a clear-thinking individual and I will
NOT agree to your proposal here. How many is "many"? Ok there was My
Lai. Rattle off a few others. And demonstrate your meaning of
"many". A hundred? A thousand? Ten thousand? Granted one is too
many. But how many is "many" ?


Hundreds of different accounts exist regarding the atrocities committed by US
soldiers in VN. Including over 100 "fragging" investigations conducted by the
Pentagon. There's a reason why most VN villagers supported the VC over US
troops.

But, let me be clear: the vast majority of US troops were just kids thrown into
an unwinnable situation. They were not evil. Their leaders let them down.


The war was a horrible mistake and resulted
in the largest embarrassment that our military ever faced.


Amen and amen, professor. Agreed. No doubt about it. Will we ever
know what precipitated it? Oh yeah .. they told us we were there to
stop communism. Right. It didn't do a lot to stop communism, but a
lot of large corporations made a lot of pesos off the war, didn't
they?

I even heard .. that the Johnson family owned a transport company that
was shipping the war supplies. Yep, Lyndon "I'll go to war myself
before I send someone else's son to war" Johnson. Those Johnsons.


Well, gee, when have I ever defended LBJ?
Kennedy, LBJ and Nixon were all deluded and misled by defense advisors.
Kissinger and McNamara were serious offenders.


And we thought only republicans were involved in big business and war
mongering.


Nope. Never said that.


Proving that GREED is a bi-partisan quality. Yes?


Agreed.

Now explain how our agreement disproves that both Republicans and Democrats
made bad decisions in VN.

And you always drift. Even if LBJ and the Demos shared responsibility for VN,
how does that refute anything Kerry had to say about VN.

Kerry spoke the truth. I respect that in someone who I intend to vote for.


WOW! The truth means something to you? The guy who lied about having a PhD? The guy
who called me on the phone telling me how he'd been fired from Louisville Technical
Institute? ( a proven lie by the way).

You're your own little circus, aren't you?

dxAce



m II August 23rd 04 06:58 PM

Michael Bryant wrote:

Any clear-thinking individual would agree that many American soldiers did
indeed carry out atrocities in VN. The war was a horrible mistake and resulted
in the largest embarrassment that our military ever faced.


It wasn't a war and was never officially declared as such. It was a
'police action'. That made it easier for the taxpayer to swallow until
some sixty thousand body bags came home, showing your tax dollars at work.


http://www.archives.gov/research_roo...ics.html#state

If Bill Gates butchered the above URL, please use:

http://snipurl.com/8lrn





mike


m II August 23rd 04 07:41 PM

KK4TL wrote:

Ok professor. You're on. I'm a clear-thinking individual and I will
NOT agree to your proposal here. How many is "many"? Ok there was My
Lai. Rattle off a few others. And demonstrate your meaning of
"many". A hundred? A thousand? Ten thousand? Granted one is too
many. But how many is "many" ?



================================================== ==
MITCHELL: We have begun hearings today to investigate the military
policy used in Vietnam which appears to us to foster war crimes. We are
concerned with such schemes as free-fire zones, search and destroy
missions, mass resettlement of peasantry and the so-called "bodycount
mania." Since the Dept of Defense [DOD] acknowledges the use of these
tactics, we wish to illustrate graphically what happens when such
tactics are translated into action. Vietnam has been called the ultimate
model war of attrition where civilians die by the score for every combat
soldier killed.
http://members.aol.com/warlibrary/vwch1.htm

================================================== ==
On October 19, 2003, the Ohio-based newspaper the Toledo Blade launched
a four-day series of investigative reports exposing a string of
atrocities by an elite, volunteer, 45-man "Tiger Force" unit of the U.S.
Army's 101st Airborne Division over the course of seven months in 1967.
The Blade goes on to state that in 1971 the Army began a 4.5 year
investigation of the alleged torture of prisoners, rapes of civilian
women, the mutilation of bodies and killing of anywhere from nine to
well over one hundred unarmed civilians, among other acts. The articles
further report that the Army's inquiry concluded that 18 U.S. soldiers
committed war crimes ranging from murder and assault to dereliction of
duty. However, not one of the soldiers, even of those still on active
duty at the time of the investigation, was ever court martialed in
connection with the heinous crimes. Moreover, six suspected war
criminals were allowed to resign from military service during the
criminal investigations specifically to avoid prosecution.


http://vancouver.indymedia.org/news/2003/11/87856.php
================================================== ==

Killing men, women, children and cutting up of bodies:

http://perso.wanadoo.fr/patrick.guen...nnews/stir.htm

================================================== ==


Hundreds more of these sites.





mike

clifto August 23rd 04 10:20 PM

m II wrote:
Michael Bryant wrote:
Any clear-thinking individual would agree that many American soldiers did
indeed carry out atrocities in VN. The war was a horrible mistake and resulted
in the largest embarrassment that our military ever faced.


It wasn't a war and was never officially declared as such. It was a
'police action'. That made it easier for the taxpayer to swallow until
some sixty thousand body bags came home, showing your tax dollars at work.


And in actual fact, the only evidence we have that "many American soldiers
did indeed carry out atrocities in VN" is from the lies told by Vietnam
Veterans Against The War.

--
Both Kerry and Edwards announced their candidacy near the beginning of September,
2003, so let's only count votes before then. From January, 2003, to August, 2003,
Senator Edwards didn't vote 69 out of 320 opportunities (~22%) and Senator Kerry
didn't vote 182 out of 320 opportunities (~57%). http://www.mwilliams.info/archives/001349.php

Michael Bryant August 24th 04 12:52 AM

From: clifto

And in actual fact, the only evidence we have that "many American soldiers
did indeed carry out atrocities in VN" is from the lies told by Vietnam
Veterans Against The War.


You've closed your eyes. The evidence of US atrocities in VN is documented by
far more voices than by Kerry. Are you really suggesting that US soldiers
didn't do a lot of bad things in 'Nam?

Maybe that'll play with some Vet groups, but the general American public is
smarter than to buy that crap!


Michael Bryant, WA4009SWL
Louisville, KY
R75, S800, RX320, SW77, ICF2010K,
DX398, 7600G, 6800W, RF2200, 7600A,
Degen 1102, GE SRll, Pro-2006, Pro-2010, Pro-76
(remove "nospam" to reply)

dxAce August 24th 04 01:01 AM



Michael Bryant wrote:

From: clifto


And in actual fact, the only evidence we have that "many American soldiers
did indeed carry out atrocities in VN" is from the lies told by Vietnam
Veterans Against The War.


You've closed your eyes. The evidence of US atrocities in VN is documented by
far more voices than by Kerry. Are you really suggesting that US soldiers
didn't do a lot of bad things in 'Nam?

Maybe that'll play with some Vet groups, but the general American public is
smarter than to buy that crap!


Are the folks at Louisville Technical Institute smart enough to know that you
lied about being fired by them? Are they smart enough to know that you lied about
having a PhD?

You just insinuated that Vets are stupid.

Think about it, Fat Boy.

dxAce



Burr August 24th 04 01:50 AM


"Michael Bryant" wrote in message
...

Maybe that'll play with some Vet groups, but the general American public

is
smarter than to buy that crap!


Michael Bryant, WA4009SWL


To bad you were not there to see for yourself!!!


Draft Dodging Ass Hole.




Michael Bryant August 24th 04 01:54 AM

Burr:

To bad you were not there to see for yourself!!!


Draft Dodging Ass Hole.


Burr, take your meds, buddy. I was 14 in 1972. A little too young for
draft-dodging.

Calm down. Take deep breaths of that Cali air.


Michael Bryant, WA4009SWL
Louisville, KY
R75, S800, RX320, SW77, ICF2010K,
DX398, 7600G, 6800W, RF2200, 7600A,
Degen 1102, GE SRll, Pro-2006, Pro-2010, Pro-76
(remove "nospam" to reply)

Burr August 24th 04 02:01 AM

You could have lied and gone in early!!!!



--
Burr

Vote "RIGHT"
Vote Republican



"Michael Bryant" wrote in message
...
Burr:

To bad you were not there to see for yourself!!!


Draft Dodging Ass Hole.


Burr, take your meds, buddy. I was 14 in 1972. A little too young for
draft-dodging.

Calm down. Take deep breaths of that Cali air.


Michael Bryant, WA4009SWL
Louisville, KY
R75, S800, RX320, SW77, ICF2010K,
DX398, 7600G, 6800W, RF2200, 7600A,
Degen 1102, GE SRll, Pro-2006, Pro-2010, Pro-76
(remove "nospam" to reply)




dxAce August 24th 04 02:02 AM



Michael Bryant wrote:

Burr:

To bad you were not there to see for yourself!!!


Draft Dodging Ass Hole.


Burr, take your meds, buddy. I was 14 in 1972. A little too young for
draft-dodging.

Calm down. Take deep breaths of that Cali air.


Take some really big hits off that bong, Fat Boy!



Michael Bryant, WA4009SWL
Louisville, KY
R75, S800, RX320, SW77, ICF2010K,
DX398, 7600G, 6800W, RF2200, 7600A,
Degen 1102, GE SRll, Pro-2006, Pro-2010, Pro-76
(remove "nospam" to reply)



dxAce August 24th 04 02:06 AM



Burr wrote:

You could have lied and gone in early!!!!


Excellent!

dxAce



--
Burr

Vote "RIGHT"
Vote Republican

"Michael Bryant" wrote in message
...
Burr:

To bad you were not there to see for yourself!!!


Draft Dodging Ass Hole.


Burr, take your meds, buddy. I was 14 in 1972. A little too young for
draft-dodging.

Calm down. Take deep breaths of that Cali air.


Michael Bryant, WA4009SWL
Louisville, KY
R75, S800, RX320, SW77, ICF2010K,
DX398, 7600G, 6800W, RF2200, 7600A,
Degen 1102, GE SRll, Pro-2006, Pro-2010, Pro-76
(remove "nospam" to reply)



Diverd4777 August 24th 04 02:14 AM

In article IhwWc.611$HY.427@trnddc03, "Burr" writes:


Maybe that'll play with some Vet groups, but the general American public

is
smarter than to buy that crap!


-B.S;

Ads are * Tested* prior to shipping; using a demographic cross section of the
area they're target to.
All the volunteers are paid for participating. They are then often " Wired Up"
with sensors, galvanic skin response receptors, ( Used to be ) Blood pressure /
breath rate apparatii, etc.
- Maybe it's all built into the " Movie Seats" in the special theater where you
watch the ads.

The participants are first shown a standard ad or cartoon to get a " Baseline "

on their unconsious responses
( Used to be a Mr. Magoo Cartoon. )

Then they show several ads. data are recorded, often they are videotaped while
they watch.
Afterwards they are either handed questionnaires to fill out, or the
participate in a
Question and answer session.

Whole things recorded so that people can go over the results later on,
correlating the reponses to the images / words / Music in the ads
Using this info, they can get a " Go" or " No Go" for a specific ad.

& before it's ever aired on T.V. they know
with a high rate of probability how * You *, watching a specific show in a
specific state, at a specific time
will react to the info & the images and the music on T.V...

There is a decay rate to the effects of these ads, meaning they pile up close
to Election day.

& If you don't have anything to sell, you trash the other guy relentlessly....








Doug Adler August 24th 04 03:08 AM

On 24 Aug 2004 00:54:03 GMT, ospam (Michael Bryant)
wrote:

Burr:

To bad you were not there to see for yourself!!!


Draft Dodging Ass Hole.


Burr, take your meds, buddy. I was 14 in 1972. A little too young for
draft-dodging.

Calm down. Take deep breaths of that Cali air.


Michael Bryant, WA4009SWL
Louisville, KY
R75, S800, RX320, SW77, ICF2010K,
DX398, 7600G, 6800W, RF2200, 7600A,
Degen 1102, GE SRll, Pro-2006, Pro-2010, Pro-76
(remove "nospam" to reply)



Just because Cheeto's are relatively cheap doesn't mean you have to
make them your #1 food source!

m II August 24th 04 04:47 AM

clifto wrote:

And in actual fact, the only evidence we have that "many American soldiers
did indeed carry out atrocities in VN" is from the lies told by Vietnam
Veterans Against The War.



It just ain't so.

================================================== ==
MITCHELL: We have begun hearings today to investigate the military
policy used in Vietnam which appears to us to foster war crimes. We are
concerned with such schemes as free-fire zones, search and destroy
missions, mass resettlement of peasantry and the so-called "bodycount
mania." Since the Dept of Defense [DOD] acknowledges the use of these
tactics, we wish to illustrate graphically what happens when such
tactics are translated into action. Vietnam has been called the ultimate
model war of attrition where civilians die by the score for every combat
soldier killed.
http://members.aol.com/warlibrary/vwch1.htm

================================================== ==
On October 19, 2003, the Ohio-based newspaper the Toledo Blade launched
a four-day series of investigative reports exposing a string of
atrocities by an elite, volunteer, 45-man "Tiger Force" unit of the U.S.
Army's 101st Airborne Division over the course of seven months in 1967.
The Blade goes on to state that in 1971 the Army began a 4.5 year
investigation of the alleged torture of prisoners, rapes of civilian
women, the mutilation of bodies and killing of anywhere from nine to
well over one hundred unarmed civilians, among other acts. The articles
further report that the Army's inquiry concluded that 18 U.S. soldiers
committed war crimes ranging from murder and assault to dereliction of
duty. However, not one of the soldiers, even of those still on active
duty at the time of the investigation, was ever court martialed in
connection with the heinous crimes. Moreover, six suspected war
criminals were allowed to resign from military service during the
criminal investigations specifically to avoid prosecution.


http://vancouver.indymedia.org/news/2003/11/87856.php
================================================== ==

Killing men, women, children and cutting up of bodies:

http://perso.wanadoo.fr/patrick.guen...nnews/stir.htm

================================================== ==

MnMikew August 24th 04 07:19 PM


"Michael Bryant" wrote in message
...

http://courierjournal.com/cjextra/ed...0822-3637.html


"The person who can bring this destructive ugliness to a halt is the
President himself. Sen. McCain, R-Ariz., has called on him to renounce the
ads.

Mr. Bush has not done so, however. Instead, his campaign has argued simply
that it had no hand in the ads. That's unlikely, but in any case it's not
the point."

Bush did so. Will Kerry do the same? Doubtful.



"No president should allow the military service of an American veteran to be
impugned recklessly and malevolently. "

The hypocrisy is amazing.





MnMikew August 24th 04 07:22 PM


"Michael Bryant" wrote in message
...
From: (John S. Dyson)


Any clear-thinking individual would agree that many American soldiers did
indeed carry out atrocities in VN.


Any many more did not. Any clear-thinking individual can see that. Answer
this Bryant, do you think that Moveon.org and F911 are not smear campaigns?
I'm sure you won't answer, it's not your style to debate.




m II August 25th 04 01:24 AM

MnMikew wrote:

Any clear-thinking individual would agree that many American soldiers did
indeed carry out atrocities in VN.



Any many more did not. Any clear-thinking individual can see that.



If that is true, why are we still picking on the Nazis? Way under one
percent committed anything resembling an atrocity. Any clear thinking
individual can see that.




mike

T. Early August 25th 04 07:08 AM


"m II" wrote in message
news:A_QWc.52122$X12.50817@edtnps84...
MnMikew wrote:

Any clear-thinking individual would agree that many American

soldiers did
indeed carry out atrocities in VN.



Any many more did not. Any clear-thinking individual can see that.



If that is true, why are we still picking on the Nazis? Way under

one
percent committed anything resembling an atrocity. Any clear

thinking
individual can see that.


And let me say in a clear thinking way that those of us who are
routinely accused of being latter day Nazis appreciate your sentiment.
I hereby designate you an honorary Uber Reichmarshall.



m II August 25th 04 07:31 AM

T. Early wrote:

And let me say in a clear thinking way that those of us who are
routinely accused of being latter day Nazis appreciate your sentiment.
I hereby designate you an honorary Uber Reichmarshall.



You haf a kind hart. Thank you. I vill cherish dis moment forefer.



mike (mit visions of Doktor Strangelove dancing in hiss head) II




MnMikew August 25th 04 06:36 PM


"m II" wrote in message
news:A_QWc.52122$X12.50817@edtnps84...
MnMikew wrote:

Any clear-thinking individual would agree that many American soldiers

did
indeed carry out atrocities in VN.



Any many more did not. Any clear-thinking individual can see that.



If that is true, why are we still picking on the Nazis? Way under one
percent committed anything resembling an atrocity. Any clear thinking
individual can see that.

But you're not really a clear thinking individual now are you? What a
ridiculous statement.



m II August 25th 04 07:25 PM

MnMikew wrote:
"m II" wrote in message
news:A_QWc.52122$X12.50817@edtnps84...

MnMikew wrote:


Any clear-thinking individual would agree that many American soldiers


did

indeed carry out atrocities in VN.


Any many more did not. Any clear-thinking individual can see that.



If that is true, why are we still picking on the Nazis? Way under one
percent committed anything resembling an atrocity. Any clear thinking
individual can see that.


But you're not really a clear thinking individual now are you? What a
ridiculous statement.




Is it? Pretend you have three countries. Each has an army with a one
percent content of lunatic murderers. Three of your non-combatant family
members are killed and mutilated by members of each army.

Will you now say that only ONE of the murderers is an evil *******? Two
of them? All them?

Will you wait until the winners write the history books and THEN decide?


mike



MnMikew August 25th 04 08:43 PM


"m II" wrote in message
news:JQ4Xc.44028$S55.28629@clgrps12...
MnMikew wrote:
"m II" wrote in message
news:A_QWc.52122$X12.50817@edtnps84...

MnMikew wrote:


Any clear-thinking individual would agree that many American soldiers


did

indeed carry out atrocities in VN.


Any many more did not. Any clear-thinking individual can see that.


If that is true, why are we still picking on the Nazis? Way under one
percent committed anything resembling an atrocity. Any clear thinking
individual can see that.


But you're not really a clear thinking individual now are you? What a
ridiculous statement.




Is it? Pretend you have three countries. Each has an army with a one
percent content of lunatic murderers. Three of your non-combatant family
members are killed and mutilated by members of each army.

Will you now say that only ONE of the murderers is an evil *******? Two
of them? All them?

Will you wait until the winners write the history books and THEN decide?


mike

The thing you don't understand is that the Nazi party embraced the
extermination of 6 million people. Did they all have a direct hand in it,
no, but they were fine with it. This was not the case in Nam.



MnMikew August 25th 04 10:45 PM


"m II" wrote in message
news:Jq7Xc.44078$S55.21201@clgrps12...
MnMikew wrote:


The thing you don't understand is that the Nazi party embraced the
extermination of 6 million people. Did they all have a direct hand in

it,
no, but they were fine with it. This was not the case in Nam.



Your present government now has plans to attack another what, sixty five
or seventy countries? The fact that you don't find this troubling shows
just how decadent your politics has become.


What! And your source for this is????



Now, tell me. If *your* family members were killed off by different
governments/parties/ideological camps, would you call just one of them
evil, some of them evil, all of them evil or does it *depend*?

Why is that simple question so hard to answer?

A question that makes no sense.



m II August 26th 04 12:27 AM

MnMikew wrote:

Your present government now has plans to attack another what, sixty five
or seventy countries? The fact that you don't find this troubling shows
just how decadent your politics has become.



What! And your source for this is????


A list of seventy enemies of the State who will be made to disappear.
http://shinbone.home.att.net/enelist.htm

A list of the *countries* was prepared by the neocons (Remember them?
They started this aggression!). It was printed out in many papers at the
time of the 'Perpetual War' declaration. Please do your own homework. If
I provide links, you'll just say they aren't credible. Show ME
Washington has NO plans of more pre emptive strikes. The zionists have
taught them well. It would appear the American intelligence service is
now just a branch office of Likud.



Now, tell me. If *your* family members were killed off by different
governments/parties/ideological camps, would you call just one of them
evil, some of them evil, all of them evil or does it *depend*?

Why is that simple question so hard to answer?


A question that makes no sense.



Evasion noted..


mike


MnMikew August 26th 04 05:13 PM


"m II" wrote in message
news:of9Xc.44110$S55.3452@clgrps12...
MnMikew wrote:

Your present government now has plans to attack another what, sixty five
or seventy countries? The fact that you don't find this troubling shows
just how decadent your politics has become.



What! And your source for this is????


A list of seventy enemies of the State who will be made to disappear.
http://shinbone.home.att.net/enelist.htm

A list of the *countries* was prepared by the neocons (Remember them?
They started this aggression!). It was printed out in many papers at the
time of the 'Perpetual War' declaration. Please do your own homework. If
I provide links, you'll just say they aren't credible. Show ME
Washington has NO plans of more pre emptive strikes. The zionists have
taught them well. It would appear the American intelligence service is
now just a branch office of Likud.

You actually think the above link is a valid source? Your hopeless.




All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:32 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com