RadioBanter

RadioBanter (https://www.radiobanter.com/)
-   Shortwave (https://www.radiobanter.com/shortwave/)
-   -   Actual Shortwave Question (https://www.radiobanter.com/shortwave/44430-actual-shortwave-question.html)

uncle arnie September 9th 04 10:54 PM

On Thu, 09 Sep 2004 02:11 am, RHF posted to
rec.radio.shortwave: %MM


UA,

Stop spreading this lie about DPR of Korea sending 'prisoners'
to help other governments that are friendly to the peoples
democratic republic and its people.. These are "Peoples
Volunteers" and their families are rewarded with an extra
ration of food and water for their patriotic service.

tic ~ RHF


Deeply sorry if this offends all the comrades of the Great Leader. LOL. Of
course they are volunteers!

uncle arnie September 10th 04 06:57 PM

On Thu, 09 Sep 2004 08:41 pm, Telamon
posted to rec.radio.shortwave:
%MM


I think we should all start calling liberals "old-fart-liberals."

Any old-fart-liberal should know better than to call all Russians
communists.


Perhaps we could revert completely to more historical names like Radical and
Reactionary, or Spiders and Bees. (If you know the classic literary
reference for the latter, you get 10 points and a gold star.)

dxAce September 10th 04 09:17 PM



uncle arnie wrote:

On Thu, 09 Sep 2004 08:41 pm, Telamon
posted to rec.radio.shortwave:
%MM


I think we should all start calling liberals "old-fart-liberals."

Any old-fart-liberal should know better than to call all Russians
communists.


Perhaps we could revert completely to more historical names like Radical and
Reactionary, or Spiders and Bees. (If you know the classic literary
reference for the latter, you get 10 points and a gold star.)


It apparently has to do with St. Ignatius. Easy enough to look up.

You can keep your gold star, I have a feeling it's fool's gold.

dxAce



clifto September 11th 04 11:52 PM

Noel wrote:
On Thu, 09 Sep 2004 08:56:46 -0500, clifto wrote:


Perhaps you mean Communist lovers instead of Russian lovers.
Usually you can tell them by their liberal fantasies.


Only a fool would mistake liberal for communist. Communism was
anything but liberal.


No. But most Communist LOVERS are liberals.

--
"The Democrats are all over this. Democratic strategists feel John Kerry's
war record means he can beat Bush. They say when it comes down to it, voters
will always vote for a war hero over someone who tried to get out of the war.
I'll be sure to mention that to Bob Dole when I see him." -- Jay Leno

clifto September 12th 04 06:17 AM

Telamon wrote:
Maybe it's because liberals these days advocate the Communist agenda
such as the redistribution of wealth and a progressive tax system. It's
pretty simple to see that the liberals and communists want the same
thing.


We already had a progressive tax system, *really* progressive like the
liberals want. I remember looking at the tax tables in my dad's income
tax booklet and looking up the tax rate on a million dollars... 98%.
Yes, ninety-eight percent. But a DEMOCRAT (mirabile dictu!) came along
and fixed that with massive tax cuts which enormously raised the amount
of money the government actually collected and which made the economy
enormously better.

--
"The Democrats are all over this. Democratic strategists feel John Kerry's
war record means he can beat Bush. They say when it comes down to it, voters
will always vote for a war hero over someone who tried to get out of the war.
I'll be sure to mention that to Bob Dole when I see him." -- Jay Leno

Juan Gonzalez September 14th 04 04:00 AM

m II wrote in
news:CFN%c.79608$jZ5.22469@clgrps13:

The Russians began deporting Chechens to Siberia and what became the
gulag in the Czarist days, and continued under Stalin with renewed
vigor. The policy was to "Russianify" minorities. A policy started
in the 18th century with Peter the Great. Approx 1.3 million
Chechens were deported in the 20th century, with 10% dying in
transport.



Throughout history there are many examples of people who have been treated
like garbage but haven't felt the need to kill children as revenge.

m II September 14th 04 04:12 AM

Juan Gonzalez wrote:

Throughout history there are many examples of people who have been treated
like garbage but haven't felt the need to kill children as revenge.



Like in the Old Testament when God Himself told some followers to bump
off their first born sons?




mike

Juan Gonzalez September 14th 04 11:06 PM

m II wrote in
news:Tkt1d.11499$XP3.7240@edtnps84:

Juan Gonzalez wrote:

Throughout history there are many examples of people who have been
treated like garbage but haven't felt the need to kill children as
revenge.



Like in the Old Testament when God Himself told some followers to bump
off their first born sons?


That would be a poor example.

bpnjensen September 15th 04 04:02 PM

Juan Gonzalez wrote in message ...
m II wrote in
news:Tkt1d.11499$XP3.7240@edtnps84:

Juan Gonzalez wrote:

Throughout history there are many examples of people who have been
treated like garbage but haven't felt the need to kill children as
revenge.



Like in the Old Testament when God Himself told some followers to bump
off their first born sons?


That would be a poor example.


True - on the other hand, there have been plenty of genocidal regimes
who have had no compunction about murdering children even when the
regime's members were not being mistreated by the group to be
murdered.

The mere fact that a person is a child does not mean that he or she
will deserve any special treatment by an opposing group. Any opposing
group. And frankly, if it will get to the heart and soul of an enemy
more quickly, there is no reason to doubt that children will *not* be
used as pawns or sacrifices. We here in the civilized, compassionate
world may cringe at the thought, but barbaric conditions result in
barbaric actions. Humanity does not equal sainthood, now or ever.

Bruce Jensen

Juan Gonzalez September 15th 04 11:24 PM

(bpnjensen) wrote in
m:

True - on the other hand, there have been plenty of genocidal regimes
who have had no compunction about murdering children even when the
regime's members were not being mistreated by the group to be
murdered.


The mere fact that a person is a child does not mean that he or she
will deserve any special treatment by an opposing group. Any opposing
group. And frankly, if it will get to the heart and soul of an enemy
more quickly, there is no reason to doubt that children will *not* be
used as pawns or sacrifices. We here in the civilized, compassionate
world may cringe at the thought, but barbaric conditions result in
barbaric actions. Humanity does not equal sainthood, now or ever.

Bruce Jensen


I agree that injustice leads to things like this, but I can't recall any
other terrorist group going into a school and directly targeting children
to get their message across. If you have children like I do this is a
horror. There are no barbaric conditions great enough to justify actions
like this or make them somehow understandable.

Not only genocidal regimes result in children losing their lives. Other
"normal" countries have done plenty of that including the USA in
Hiroshima, Nagasaki, Dresden, Vietnam etc.), but colateral damage is one
thing and directly targeting children is another..


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:34 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com