Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old September 10th 04, 02:19 AM
Mr. Schnell
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Granger" wrote in message
news:WF10d.136482$4o.10407@fed1read01...
Ya right!

It doesn't mean the original documents were fakes. The original documents
after 32 years probably were faded, discolored and not legible. They were
almost certainly reproduced using a Microsoft spread sheet in order to make
them more legible. I see no problem with this. I would however like to see
the originals. I have searched the CBS website and their archives, but I
haven't been able to locate anything on this. Maybe, someone has an address.
I have a $100.00 bet that they are genuine.

JB

"llortamai" wrote in message
...
http://www.drudgereport.com/

32-year-old documents produced Wednesday by CBSNEWS 60 MINS on Bush's

guard
service may have been forged using a current word processing program.

typed using a proportional font, not common at that time, and they used

a
superscript font feature found in today's Microsoft Word program,

Internet
reports claim... Developing...







  #2   Report Post  
Old September 10th 04, 05:26 AM
Sir Cumference
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Mr. Schnell wrote:

"Granger" wrote in message
news:WF10d.136482$4o.10407@fed1read01...

Ya right!


It doesn't mean the original documents were fakes. The original documents
after 32 years probably were faded, discolored and not legible.


Huh? I have documents much older than that that are perfectly legible.
There is no reason these 32 year old docs should not be legible.

They were
almost certainly reproduced using a Microsoft spread sheet in order to make
them more legible.


So why attempt to reproduce them exactly if all you want is to get the
wording of the documents. Just explain, the documents have been retyped
word for word for legibility.

  #3   Report Post  
Old September 11th 04, 06:48 PM
Dan Wood
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Sir Cumference" wrote in message
...
Mr. Schnell wrote:

"Granger" wrote in message
news:WF10d.136482$4o.10407@fed1read01...

Ya right!


It doesn't mean the original documents were fakes. The original

documents
after 32 years probably were faded, discolored and not legible.


Huh? I have documents much older than that that are perfectly legible.
There is no reason these 32 year old docs should not be legible.

They were
almost certainly reproduced using a Microsoft spread sheet in order to

make
them more legible.


So why attempt to reproduce them exactly if all you want is to get the
wording of the documents. Just explain, the documents have been retyped
word for word for legibility.

I have become disallusioned wuth American politics. Vote for Nader.


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Here is My Resume. Who Am I? Roger Gt General 10 December 17th 03 08:50 PM
Here is My Resume. Who Am I? private Scanner 10 December 17th 03 08:50 PM
Here is My Resume. Who Am I? RHF Shortwave 9 December 17th 03 08:50 PM
Why did Bush run away from service in Vietnam? RHF Shortwave 1 July 21st 03 10:46 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:33 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017