Michael Bryant wrote:

Regarding the charge that the fonts prove the documents are fake:

BZZZZT! Try again. The White House distributed the memos ...

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/5952048/

... and didn't question their authenticity is well taken. As for the font not
being available in the 70s, the claim is that proportional fonts were not
available until the seventies.

http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewPolitics....%5Carchive%5C2
00409%5CPOL20040909d.html

In fact, they've been around since the forties.

http://www-1.ibm.com/ibm/history/history/year_1941.html

A web of unashamed lies is unraveling at a very opportune moment.

Is that like your lies of having a PhD, getting fired from Louisville Technical
Institute, drug bust while at Weber State, etc, etc., etc?

SMELL the
desperation!

Indeed.

dxAce



Michael Bryant, WA4009SWL
Louisville, KY
R75, S800, RX320, SW77, ICF2010K,
DX398, 7600G, 6800W, RF2200, 7600A,
Degen 1102, Degen 1103, GE SRll,
Pro-2006, Pro-2010, Pro-76
(remove "nospam" to reply)

Michael Bryant wrote:

Regarding the charge that the fonts prove the documents are fake:

BZZZZT! Try again. The White House distributed the memos ...

BZZZZT!! Wrong again mickeyboy, CBS faxed the memos to the White House.
Now go wipe you nose and finish you cookies and milk.

Subject: '60 Minutes' Documents on Bush Might Be Fake
From: Sir Cumference
Date: 9/10/2004 12:15 PM Central Daylight Time
Message-id:

Michael Bryant wrote:

Regarding the charge that the fonts prove the documents are fake:

BZZZZT! Try again. The White House distributed the memos ...

BZZZZT!! Wrong again mickeyboy, CBS faxed the memos to the White House.
Now go wipe you nose and finish you cookies and milk.



LOL!! Why don't you wipe "your" nose and finish "your" cookies and milk.
English and spelling are not your strong point.

Les

Llgpt wrote:

Subject: '60 Minutes' Documents on Bush Might Be Fake
From: Sir Cumference
Date: 9/10/2004 12:15 PM Central Daylight Time
Message-id:

Michael Bryant wrote:

Regarding the charge that the fonts prove the documents are fake:

BZZZZT! Try again. The White House distributed the memos ...

BZZZZT!! Wrong again mickeyboy, CBS faxed the memos to the White House.
Now go wipe you nose and finish you cookies and milk.



LOL!! Why don't you wipe "your" nose and finish "your" cookies and milk.
English and spelling are not your strong point.

But he did get his point across, did he not?

dxAce



Les

Hell his "Honorable Discharge" Might be fake as well?



"Michael Bryant" wrote in message
...
Regarding the charge that the fonts prove the documents are fake:

BZZZZT! Try again. The White House distributed the memos ...

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/5952048/

... and didn't question their authenticity is well taken. As for the font
not
being available in the 70s, the claim is that proportional fonts were not
available until the seventies.

http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewPolitics....%5Carchive%5C2
00409%5CPOL20040909d.html

In fact, they've been around since the forties.

http://www-1.ibm.com/ibm/history/history/year_1941.html

A web of unashamed lies is unraveling at a very opportune moment. SMELL
the
desperation!


Michael Bryant, WA4009SWL
Louisville, KY
R75, S800, RX320, SW77, ICF2010K,
DX398, 7600G, 6800W, RF2200, 7600A,
Degen 1102, Degen 1103, GE SRll,
Pro-2006, Pro-2010, Pro-76
(remove "nospam" to reply)

Just like Steve LIARe's
"Billybob" wrote in message
...
Hell his "Honorable Discharge" Might be fake as well?



"Michael Bryant" wrote in message
...
Regarding the charge that the fonts prove the documents are fake:

BZZZZT! Try again. The White House distributed the memos ...

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/5952048/

... and didn't question their authenticity is well taken. As for the
font
not
being available in the 70s, the claim is that proportional fonts were
not
available until the seventies.

http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewPolitics....%5Carchive%5C2
00409%5CPOL20040909d.html

In fact, they've been around since the forties.

http://www-1.ibm.com/ibm/history/history/year_1941.html

A web of unashamed lies is unraveling at a very opportune moment. SMELL
the
desperation!


Michael Bryant, WA4009SWL
Louisville, KY
R75, S800, RX320, SW77, ICF2010K,
DX398, 7600G, 6800W, RF2200, 7600A,
Degen 1102, Degen 1103, GE SRll,
Pro-2006, Pro-2010, Pro-76
(remove "nospam" to reply)

llortamai wrote:
http://www.drudgereport.com/

32-year-old documents produced Wednesday by CBSNEWS 60 MINS on Bush's
guard service may have been forged using a current word processing
program.

typed using a proportional font, not common at that time, and they
used a superscript font feature found in today's Microsoft Word
program, Internet reports claim... Developing...

Developing? Actually already DEBUNKED!!!

Electric ball typewriters could do that, and the US government
had lots of them.

You guys are desperate and in total denial.

Bush deserted and there is proof of that.

In article ,
"Paolo Pizzi" wrote:

llortamai wrote:
http://www.drudgereport.com/

32-year-old documents produced Wednesday by CBSNEWS 60 MINS on Bush's
guard service may have been forged using a current word processing
program.

typed using a proportional font, not common at that time, and they
used a superscript font feature found in today's Microsoft Word
program, Internet reports claim... Developing...

Developing? Actually already DEBUNKED!!!

Electric ball typewriters could do that, and the US government
had lots of them.

You guys are desperate and in total denial.

You sound pretty desperate.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

Paolo Pizzi wrote:

llortamai wrote:

http://www.drudgereport.com/

32-year-old documents produced Wednesday by CBSNEWS 60 MINS on Bush's
guard service may have been forged using a current word processing
program.

typed using a proportional font, not common at that time, and they
used a superscript font feature found in today's Microsoft Word
program, Internet reports claim... Developing...


Developing? Actually already DEBUNKED!!!

Electric ball typewriters could do that, and the US government
had lots of them.

BZZZZTTT!!! Wrong! The Selectric could not do proportional spacing. I
worked for IBM and worked on the Selectric units that were use as the
output device for the System 360 mainframe console. You haven't a clue
about which you speak.

Sir Cumference wrote:

Electric ball typewriters could do that, and the US government
had lots of them.


BZZZZTTT!!! Wrong! The Selectric could not do proportional spacing. I
worked for IBM and worked on the Selectric units that were use as the
output device for the System 360 mainframe console. You haven't a clue
about which you speak.



===================================
Composing typewriters


Derogatorily called "Strike-on" composition, the composing typewriter
was used for camera-ready copy in the quick-print business, in academic
publishing, and small weeklies, where cost and turn-around were the
driving factors. The best were capable of proportional spacing,
justification, and handling multiple fonts. The familiar IBM Executive
and Selectric can be considered to be in the low-end of this family; the
IBM Composing Selectric was a computer-driven, auto-justifying, high-end
system.

* Friden Justowriters (2)
* Varitypers (2) with 60 fonts
* Densmore
* Underwood
* L.C.Smith
* NCR
* IBM Composing Selectric (4) (w/o computer or tape units, but w/
multiple type balls)
* other

http://www.museumofprinting.com/inventory/invty.html


==================================================