Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
dxAce wrote:
dxAce wrote: Llgpt wrote: Subject: '60 Minutes' Documents on Bush Might Be Fake From: Sir Cumference Date: 9/10/2004 12:15 PM Central Daylight Time Message-id: Michael Bryant wrote: Regarding the charge that the fonts prove the documents are fake: BZZZZT! Try again. The White House distributed the memos ... BZZZZT!! Wrong again mickeyboy, CBS faxed the memos to the White House. Now go wipe you nose and finish you cookies and milk. LOL!! Why don't you wipe "your" nose and finish "your" cookies and milk. English and spelling are not your strong point. But he did get his point across, did he not? Here's an example: Les Locklear fax's me fake documents. I release said documents to the public, indicating that they came from Les Locklear. How does/or would that make me responsible in any way for the fact that they were fakes? Depends upon if you are touting the information in those documents as being true are not. If you are touting the contents of the documents as truth, you should be verifying the validy of the documents. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Here is My Resume. Who Am I? | General | |||
Here is My Resume. Who Am I? | Scanner | |||
Here is My Resume. Who Am I? | Shortwave | |||
Why did Bush run away from service in Vietnam? | Shortwave |