-=jd=- wrote:

On Sat 11 Sep 2004 07:09:28a, "John" wrote in message
:


Dan wrote:

On 11 Sep 2004 01:42:56 GMT, "-=jd=-"
wrote:



In addition to the questionable typographics, we even have the wife,
son and others who worked with the purported author saying they are
suspicious of the documents for a variety of reasons.

I think *this* is the most important evidence of why these documents
are fake. These documents are purported to come from his "personal"
files, yet neither the son nor the widow are the source. Where did
they come from? How do you obtain "personal" files from someone
other than a family member?

Dan


There is NO reliable evidence the documents are fake. The White House
released Months and years ago other documents withthe same typographical
characteristics. How do these so called document "experts" explain
that ?




I have not heard that reported yet. What I have heard was that the Bush
admin released some documents that had the same typographics - but they
turned out to be documents faxed to them by CBS, who has yet to source the
origin of the other suspect documents.!


Have they even shown or said they have the original documents?